Eklavvya Pricing & Plans 2026

Name: Eklavvya
Brand: Eklavvya
Price: 1 USD
Availability: InStock

Complete pricing guide for Eklavvya. Compare all plans, analyze costs, and find the perfect tier for your needs.

Not sure if free is enough? See our Free vs Paid comparison →
Still deciding? Read our full verdict on whether Eklavvya is worth it →

💎3 Paid Plans

⚡No Setup Fees

Choose Your Plan

Small-Scale / Pilot

Estimated $1–$3 per candidate per exam

Start Free Trial →

Mid-Scale Enterprise / University

Estimated $5,000–$30,000/year

Start Free Trial →

Large-Scale Government / Institutional

Estimated $30,000–$100,000+/year

Start Free Trial →

Pricing sourced from Eklavvya · Last verified March 2026

Feature Comparison

Detailed feature comparison coming soon. Visit Eklavvya's website for complete plan details.

View Full Features →

Is Eklavvya Worth It?

✅ Why Choose Eklavvya

• Combines AI-driven asynchronous video interviews with full online examination capabilities in a single platform, reducing the need to stitch together separate ATS and assessment tools
• Offers multiple proctoring modes — AI-only, live human, and hybrid — letting organizations match oversight intensity to the stakes of the assessment
• Supports a broad range of question types including coding, descriptive, audio/video response, and image-based questions, suitable for both technical and non-technical roles
• Built to scale for large concurrent test-taker volumes, making it viable for university-wide and government-scale examinations
• Provides multilingual support and bulk candidate management features useful for organizations operating across regions
• Includes secure browser lockdown, randomized question banks, and behavioral monitoring to deter cheating in high-stakes settings

⚠️ Consider This

• Pricing is not published publicly — every deployment requires a sales conversation, which slows evaluation for smaller teams
• Heavy feature set is oriented toward enterprise and institutional buyers; small businesses may find the platform broader than needed
• AI scoring of interview responses, like all video-AI evaluation tools, can carry bias risks and should not be used as a sole hiring decision input
• Documentation and self-serve onboarding are limited compared to product-led SaaS competitors, increasing dependency on the vendor's implementation team
• Proctoring features depend on candidate hardware (camera, microphone, stable internet), which can create friction in low-bandwidth regions

What Users Say About Eklavvya

👍 What Users Love

✓Combines AI-driven asynchronous video interviews with full online examination capabilities in a single platform, reducing the need to stitch together separate ATS and assessment tools
✓Offers multiple proctoring modes — AI-only, live human, and hybrid — letting organizations match oversight intensity to the stakes of the assessment
✓Supports a broad range of question types including coding, descriptive, audio/video response, and image-based questions, suitable for both technical and non-technical roles
✓Built to scale for large concurrent test-taker volumes, making it viable for university-wide and government-scale examinations
✓Provides multilingual support and bulk candidate management features useful for organizations operating across regions
✓Includes secure browser lockdown, randomized question banks, and behavioral monitoring to deter cheating in high-stakes settings

👎 Common Concerns

⚠Pricing is not published publicly — every deployment requires a sales conversation, which slows evaluation for smaller teams
⚠Heavy feature set is oriented toward enterprise and institutional buyers; small businesses may find the platform broader than needed
⚠AI scoring of interview responses, like all video-AI evaluation tools, can carry bias risks and should not be used as a sole hiring decision input
⚠Documentation and self-serve onboarding are limited compared to product-led SaaS competitors, increasing dependency on the vendor's implementation team
⚠Proctoring features depend on candidate hardware (camera, microphone, stable internet), which can create friction in low-bandwidth regions

Pricing FAQ

What is Eklavvya used for?

Eklavvya is used for conducting online examinations, AI-proctored assessments, and AI-driven video interviews. Common use cases include recruitment screening, university entrance and semester exams, certification testing, government recruitment exams, and corporate training evaluations. The platform has been used to deliver over 10 million assessments across more than 200 organizations.

How does Eklavvya's AI proctoring work?

AI proctoring uses the candidate's webcam and microphone to monitor face presence, detect multiple persons in frame, track eye and head movement, identify tab-switching, and flag suspicious ambient audio. Sessions are recorded and flagged events are surfaced in a review dashboard. Live and hybrid proctoring modes are also available.

Does Eklavvya support coding assessments?

Yes. The platform supports coding questions alongside multiple choice, descriptive, audio/video response, and image-based formats, making it suitable for technical hiring and computer science examinations.

How much does Eklavvya cost?

Eklavvya does not publish fixed pricing tiers. Based on industry benchmarks for similar enterprise assessment platforms, indicative costs typically fall in the range of $1–$5 per candidate per exam for AI-proctored assessments and $3–$8 per candidate for live-proctored sessions. Annual platform licensing for mid-size deployments (5,000–50,000 candidates) is commonly quoted in the $5,000–$30,000 range depending on features. By comparison, competitors like Mettl and iMocha publish per-candidate pricing starting around $2–$4 per assessment, and HireVue's enterprise plans start around $35,000/year. Organizations should contact Eklavvya sales for exact quotes and request itemized breakdowns separating exam delivery, AI proctoring, live proctoring, and AI interview modules.

Can Eklavvya replace a traditional recruitment interview?

Eklavvya can automate first-round screening through AI-evaluated asynchronous video interviews, significantly reducing recruiter time on initial filtering. However, it is generally used to shortlist candidates for later human interviews rather than to make final hiring decisions on its own.

Ready to Get Started?

AI builders and operators use Eklavvya to streamline their workflow.

Try Eklavvya Now →

More about Eklavvya

Review Alternatives Free vs Paid Pros & Cons Worth It?Tutorial

Choose Your Plan

Small-Scale / Pilot

Estimated $1–$3 per candidate per exam

Start Free Trial →

Mid-Scale Enterprise / University

Estimated $5,000–$30,000/year

Start Free Trial →

Large-Scale Government / Institutional

Estimated $30,000–$100,000+/year

Start Free Trial →

Pricing sourced from Eklavvya · Last verified March 2026

Is Eklavvya Worth It?

✅ Why Choose Eklavvya

• Combines AI-driven asynchronous video interviews with full online examination capabilities in a single platform, reducing the need to stitch together separate ATS and assessment tools
• Offers multiple proctoring modes — AI-only, live human, and hybrid — letting organizations match oversight intensity to the stakes of the assessment
• Supports a broad range of question types including coding, descriptive, audio/video response, and image-based questions, suitable for both technical and non-technical roles
• Built to scale for large concurrent test-taker volumes, making it viable for university-wide and government-scale examinations
• Provides multilingual support and bulk candidate management features useful for organizations operating across regions
• Includes secure browser lockdown, randomized question banks, and behavioral monitoring to deter cheating in high-stakes settings

⚠️ Consider This

• Pricing is not published publicly — every deployment requires a sales conversation, which slows evaluation for smaller teams
• Heavy feature set is oriented toward enterprise and institutional buyers; small businesses may find the platform broader than needed
• AI scoring of interview responses, like all video-AI evaluation tools, can carry bias risks and should not be used as a sole hiring decision input
• Documentation and self-serve onboarding are limited compared to product-led SaaS competitors, increasing dependency on the vendor's implementation team
• Proctoring features depend on candidate hardware (camera, microphone, stable internet), which can create friction in low-bandwidth regions

What Users Say About Eklavvya

👍 What Users Love

✓Combines AI-driven asynchronous video interviews with full online examination capabilities in a single platform, reducing the need to stitch together separate ATS and assessment tools
✓Offers multiple proctoring modes — AI-only, live human, and hybrid — letting organizations match oversight intensity to the stakes of the assessment
✓Supports a broad range of question types including coding, descriptive, audio/video response, and image-based questions, suitable for both technical and non-technical roles
✓Built to scale for large concurrent test-taker volumes, making it viable for university-wide and government-scale examinations
✓Provides multilingual support and bulk candidate management features useful for organizations operating across regions
✓Includes secure browser lockdown, randomized question banks, and behavioral monitoring to deter cheating in high-stakes settings

👎 Common Concerns

⚠Pricing is not published publicly — every deployment requires a sales conversation, which slows evaluation for smaller teams
⚠Heavy feature set is oriented toward enterprise and institutional buyers; small businesses may find the platform broader than needed
⚠AI scoring of interview responses, like all video-AI evaluation tools, can carry bias risks and should not be used as a sole hiring decision input
⚠Documentation and self-serve onboarding are limited compared to product-led SaaS competitors, increasing dependency on the vendor's implementation team
⚠Proctoring features depend on candidate hardware (camera, microphone, stable internet), which can create friction in low-bandwidth regions