No free plan. The cheapest way in is paid plan at Contact Sales (estimated $150–$300/user/month). Consider free alternatives in the research agents category if budget is tight.
GC AI is built specifically for in-house legal teams, general counsel, and corporate legal departments. It targets lawyers who support business operations inside a company rather than law firms serving outside clients, with workflows optimized for contract review, drafting, and legal research at corporate scale.
According to the vendor, the platform holds SOC 2 Type II certification and operates under a zero data retention policy. Customer inputs are stated not to be used to train underlying AI models and are not retained beyond the active session. Prospective buyers should request current certification documentation and review the data processing agreement during evaluation.
Common use cases include drafting and redlining contracts such as NDAs, MSAs, and SaaS agreements; reviewing third-party paper against company playbooks; summarizing long documents; extracting key terms; answering policy questions from employees; and conducting first-pass legal research.
CLM platforms focus on the end-to-end contract process—repository, workflow, approvals, and e-signature. GC AI focuses on the AI-driven analytical and drafting work itself, acting as an intelligent assistant for in-house counsel rather than a system of record for contracts.
GC AI is offered on a subscription basis with pricing not published publicly. Prospective customers contact the sales team for a tailored quote. Based on comparable enterprise legal AI platforms in this category, per-user pricing typically falls in the range of $150–$500 per user per month, though actual pricing will vary based on team size, usage volume, and required enterprise features such as SSO, audit logging, and integrations. Annual contracts with volume discounts are typical for this category. Buyers should confirm current pricing directly with the vendor.
See GC AI plans and find the right tier for your needs.
See Pricing Plans →Still not sure? Read our full verdict →
Last verified March 2026