THE COMPARISON / A CLOSER LOOK
Gumloop vs Make.com
Compare the listed plans, useful capabilities, and practical tradeoffs.
Prices and features reflect editorial records. Check vendor terms before you buy; documentary checks do not imply hands-on testing.
Gumloop
🟢No CodeAI Automation
Gumloop is a collaborative visual platform for building and governing AI agents and automations with multiple models, shared credentials, and MCP support.
SOURCE-CHECK COVERAGE
No scoped source-check record shown. Check current pricing and vendor terms before buying.
Starting Price
FreeMake.com
🟢No CodeAutomation & Workflows
Make.com: Visual automation platform with AI integration and workflow…
SOURCE-CHECK COVERAGE
No scoped source-check record shown. Check current pricing and vendor terms before buying.
Starting Price
FreeFeature Comparison
Focus the table and use arrow keys to scroll when columns extend beyond the screen.
Gumloop - Pros & Cons
Pros
- ✓Unlimited seats and agents reduce per-user friction for cross-functional collaboration
- ✓Pricing page clearly explains credits, orchestration fees, overages, and BYOK behavior
- ✓Supports 35+ models and combines visual building with CLI and GitHub-oriented features
- ✓Can host a custom MCP server and proxy MCP servers without separate infrastructure
Cons
- ✗Unused monthly credits do not roll over, reducing value for teams with uneven demand
- ✗Agents stop after included credits are exhausted unless pay-as-you-go is explicitly enabled
- ✗Bringing model-provider API keys increases the orchestration fee from 8% to 16%
- ✗RBAC, SCIM/SAML, audit logs, custom retention, and VPC deployment require custom Enterprise pricing
Make.com - Pros & Cons
Pros
- ✓Visual scenario builder supports routers, filters, scheduled runs, subscenarios, real-time execution monitoring, and reusable scenario templates.
- ✓Large connector ecosystem with 3,000+ standard apps, 350+ AI apps, and 300+ Make API endpoints for custom automation work.
- ✓Free plan includes 1,000 credits/month, 2 active scenarios, 3,000+ apps, routers and filters, and customer support with no time limit.
- ✓Paid plans support unlimited active scenarios, 1-minute scheduling, higher data transfer limits, and access to the Make API starting at $12/month for 10,000 credits.
- ✓Enterprise options include SSO, domain claim, on-prem agents for local systems such as SAP, advanced security features, 24/7 Enterprise support, and overage protection.
- ✓Make is used by 400,000+ customers across 200+ countries and territories, backed by a team of 350+ employees and parent company Celonis.
Cons
- ✗Credit-based billing can become hard to forecast because each module action in a scenario consumes credits.
- ✗The Free plan is limited to 1,000 credits/month, 2 active scenarios, 15-minute minimum scheduling, 5-minute maximum execution time, and 5 MB file processing.
- ✗Native AI features are useful for orchestration, but Make is not a full model development, vector database, or dedicated RAG platform.
- ✗Advanced governance and security features such as SSO, domain claim, audit logs, 24/7 support, and on-prem agents are Enterprise-oriented.
- ✗Complex scenarios still require careful technical design, especially when handling retries, data transformation, API limits, and high-volume AI calls.
Not sure which to pick?
🎯 Take our quiz →🔒 Security & Compliance Comparison
Focus the table and use arrow keys to scroll when columns extend beyond the screen.
Price Alert Interest
Record the tools you want pricing updates for