Gumloop vs Make.com

Detailed side-by-side comparison to help you choose the right tool

Gumloop

🟡Low Code

AI workflow automation

A visual automation platform for building AI agents and workflows with hosted models, connectors, and governance.

Was this helpful?

Starting Price

Free

Make.com

🟢No Code

Automation & Workflows

Make.com: Visual automation platform with AI integration and workflow orchestration

Was this helpful?

Starting Price

Free

Feature Comparison

Scroll horizontally to compare details.

FeatureGumloopMake.com
CategoryAI workflow automationAutomation & Workflows
Pricing Plans8 tiers4 tiers
Starting PriceFreeFree
Key Features
  • • Visual AI automation framework for flows, agents, triggers, and app-connected work
  • • Prebuilt agent examples for data analysis, support triage, CRM work, meeting prep, and call analysis
  • • Free plan with 5k credits/month, one seat, one active trigger, and unlimited agents/flows
  • • Workflow Runtime
  • • Tool and API Connectivity
  • • State and Context Handling

Gumloop - Pros & Cons

Pros

  • ✓Fast visual composition
  • ✓Broad model choice
  • ✓Pay-as-you-go is off by default
  • ✓MCP expands interoperability
  • ✓Teamspaces support shared ownership

Cons

  • ✗Included credits do not roll over
  • ✗Cost has several components
  • ✗8% orchestration fee remains with BYOK
  • ✗Complex agent branches are harder to debug
  • ✗Enterprise pricing requires sales

Make.com - Pros & Cons

Pros

  • ✓Visual scenario builder supports routers, filters, scheduled runs, subscenarios, real-time execution monitoring, and reusable scenario templates.
  • ✓Large connector ecosystem with 3,000+ standard apps, 350+ AI apps, and 300+ Make API endpoints for custom automation work.
  • ✓Free plan includes 1,000 credits/month, 2 active scenarios, 3,000+ apps, routers and filters, and customer support with no time limit.
  • ✓Paid plans support unlimited active scenarios, 1-minute scheduling, higher data transfer limits, and access to the Make API starting at $12/month for 10,000 credits.
  • ✓Enterprise options include SSO, domain claim, on-prem agents for local systems such as SAP, advanced security features, 24/7 Enterprise support, and overage protection.
  • ✓Make is used by 400,000+ customers across 200+ countries and territories, backed by a team of 350+ employees and parent company Celonis.

Cons

  • ✗Credit-based billing can become hard to forecast because each module action in a scenario consumes credits.
  • ✗The Free plan is limited to 1,000 credits/month, 2 active scenarios, 15-minute minimum scheduling, 5-minute maximum execution time, and 5 MB file processing.
  • ✗Native AI features are useful for orchestration, but Make is not a full model development, vector database, or dedicated RAG platform.
  • ✗Advanced governance and security features such as SSO, domain claim, audit logs, 24/7 support, and on-prem agents are Enterprise-oriented.
  • ✗Complex scenarios still require careful technical design, especially when handling retries, data transformation, API limits, and high-volume AI calls.

Not sure which to pick?

🎯 Take our quiz →

🔒 Security & Compliance Comparison

Scroll horizontally to compare details.

Security FeatureGumloopMake.com
SOC2✅ Yes✅ Yes
GDPR✅ Yes✅ Yes
HIPAA❌ No❌ No
SSO—✅ Yes
Self-Hosted✅ Yes❌ No
On-Prem—✅ Yes
RBAC—✅ Yes
Audit Log—✅ Yes
Open Source❌ No❌ No
API Key Auth✅ Yes✅ Yes
Encryption at Rest—✅ Yes
Encryption in Transit—✅ Yes
Data Residency—US, EU
Data Retention—plan-dependent
🦞

New to AI tools?

Read practical guides for choosing and using AI tools

🔔

Price Drop Alerts

Get notified when AI tools lower their prices

Tracking 2 tools

We only email when prices actually change. No spam, ever.

Get weekly AI agent tool insights

Comparisons, new tool launches, and expert recommendations delivered to your inbox.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Ready to Choose?

Read the full reviews to make an informed decision