Stay free if you only need unlimited users and full open-source feature set. Upgrade if you need sso/saml integration and soc2 compliance and audit logs. Most solo builders can start free.
Why it matters: Self-hosting requires DevOps expertise and ongoing infrastructure management overhead
Available from: Team (Cloud)
Why it matters: Smaller ecosystem compared to established platforms like Retool or Zapier
Available from: Team (Cloud)
Why it matters: Learning curve for teams transitioning from commercial no-code platforms
Available from: Team (Cloud)
Why it matters: Cloud pricing ($8/user/month) can become costly for large teams compared to self-hosting
Available from: Team (Cloud)
Why it matters: Enterprise features and professional services add significant cost premium
Available from: Team (Cloud)
Windmill and Retool both enable teams to build internal tools quickly, but they differ fundamentally in pricing model and flexibility. Retool charges per-seat licensing fees ($10-50/user/month) that scale linearly with team size, while Windmill is open-source and can be self-hosted at zero licensing cost. Windmill is more developer-centric, letting engineers write scripts in Python, TypeScript, Go, or Bash and automatically generating UIs, whereas Retool emphasizes a drag-and-drop visual builder. For teams with strong engineering talent who want full code control and lower costs at scale, Windmill is typically the better fit.
Windmill can serve as a replacement for Airflow in many workflow orchestration scenarios, particularly for teams building internal tools alongside data pipelines. Windmill's vendor benchmarks claim 13x faster execution than Airflow, which could translate to lower compute costs and faster feedback loops. Unlike Airflow's Python-only DAG definitions, Windmill supports multiple languages and provides a visual flow editor. However, Airflow has a much larger ecosystem of pre-built operators and integrations for data engineering specifically, so teams with heavy ETL workloads relying on specialized Airflow providers should evaluate integration coverage before migrating.
Windmill natively supports scripts written in Python, TypeScript/JavaScript, Go, Bash, SQL, and GraphQL. Each script automatically gets a generated UI form, REST API endpoint, and can be composed into larger workflows. Windmill provides built-in integrations with databases (PostgreSQL, MySQL, MongoDB), cloud services (AWS, GCP, Azure), SaaS tools (Slack, GitHub, Google Workspace), and supports custom API connections via HTTP requests. The platform also supports importing existing npm and pip packages, so teams can leverage their current dependency ecosystems without rewriting code.
Windmill is primarily designed for developers and technical teams who are comfortable writing scripts. While it auto-generates UIs from scripts that non-technical users can then interact with as end users, the process of creating and configuring workflows requires coding knowledge. This is a key difference from no-code platforms like Zapier or Retool's visual builder. Organizations typically have developers build the tools and workflows in Windmill, then share the generated apps and dashboards with non-technical stakeholders who use them through a simplified interface.
Windmill can be self-hosted using Docker Compose for smaller deployments or Kubernetes (via Helm charts) for production-scale environments. The minimum infrastructure requirement is a single server with 2 CPU cores and 4GB RAM for small teams, though production deployments typically use dedicated PostgreSQL databases and multiple worker nodes for parallel execution. Self-hosting gives teams full control over data residency, network security, and scaling, but requires ongoing maintenance including updates, backups, and monitoring. Teams without dedicated DevOps capacity may prefer Windmill's managed cloud offering to avoid this operational overhead.
Start with the free plan — upgrade when you need more.
Get Started Free →Still not sure? Read our full verdict →
Last verified March 2026