Experiment tracking and model evaluation used in agent development.
Tracks all your AI experiments automatically — compare different approaches and share results with your team.
Weights & Biases (W&B) is an MLOps platform that has expanded from experiment tracking for traditional ML into LLM evaluation, prompt engineering, and agent observability. Its core strength remains experiment tracking — W&B's ability to log, compare, and visualize thousands of experiments is unmatched — and the LLM-specific features build on this foundation.
W&B Weave is the LLM-focused product layer. It provides tracing for LLM applications with automatic capture of inputs, outputs, token counts, and latency. Unlike LLM-native tools, Weave inherits W&B's experiment tracking DNA: you can version prompts, log evaluation metrics, and compare different model configurations using the same dashboarding system that ML engineers already know for training runs.
The evaluation framework in Weave is particularly strong. You define evaluation datasets, create scorer functions (including LLM-as-judge), and run structured evaluations that automatically log results as W&B experiments. This means you get parallel coordinate plots, metric distributions, and comparison tables across evaluation runs — capabilities that LLM-specific tools are still catching up to.
W&B Tables enable collaborative data exploration. Teams can log structured data (including LLM outputs, evaluation scores, metadata) and explore it interactively with filtering, sorting, and custom visualizations. This is powerful for reviewing evaluation results or analyzing production traces as a team.
The integration story is broad but sometimes shallow. W&B has integrations for LangChain, LlamaIndex, OpenAI, Hugging Face, and dozens more, but the depth varies. The Hugging Face and PyTorch integrations are excellent (reflecting W&B's ML heritage). The LLM framework integrations are newer and sometimes lag behind purpose-built tools.
The honest tradeoff: W&B is the best choice if your team already uses it for ML experiment tracking and wants a unified platform for both traditional ML and LLM work. The LLM features benefit enormously from the existing experiment management infrastructure. However, if you're purely building LLM applications without traditional ML workflows, dedicated LLM observability tools like Langfuse or Braintrust offer more focused, streamlined experiences. W&B's breadth means the LLM-specific features can feel like they're bolted onto an ML platform rather than being the primary focus.
Was this helpful?
Weights & Biases brings its proven ML experiment tracking experience to LLM observability with W&B Weave. The platform excels at experiment comparison, artifact versioning, and collaborative workflows for ML teams. LLM-specific features like prompt tracing and evaluation are newer and less mature than dedicated LLM tools. Best for teams already invested in the W&B ecosystem who want to extend it to LLM development rather than adopt a separate tool.
Automatic tracing for LLM applications that captures function calls, LLM invocations, tool usage, and custom spans. Built on W&B's experiment tracking infrastructure, so traces are versioned, searchable, and comparable across runs.
Use Case:
Tracing an agent workflow and comparing the execution patterns across different prompt versions using W&B's run comparison interface.
Define evaluation datasets, scorer functions, and run evaluations that automatically log as W&B experiments. Supports LLM-as-judge scorers, programmatic validators, and human evaluation workflows with results visualized in W&B dashboards.
Use Case:
Running weekly regression evaluations of your RAG pipeline and tracking precision/recall/hallucination metrics over time using W&B's experiment charts.
Interactive tables for exploring logged data with filtering, grouping, and custom column rendering. Supports rich media (images, audio, text) and enables team-based review of LLM outputs, evaluation results, and production samples.
Use Case:
Reviewing 1,000 customer support agent responses with the team, filtering by quality score, and annotating problematic outputs directly in the table.
Version-controlled prompt templates stored in W&B with lineage tracking. Prompts are linked to evaluation runs, so you can see exactly which prompt version produced which results across your experiment history.
Use Case:
Tracking how 15 iterations of a system prompt affected hallucination rates, with each iteration linked to its evaluation scores.
Rich reporting system that combines charts, tables, markdown, and embedded visualizations into shareable documents. Team members can collaboratively annotate runs, add insights, and create reproducible analyses.
Use Case:
Creating a weekly model performance report that automatically pulls the latest evaluation metrics and distributes it to stakeholders.
Track datasets, models, prompts, and evaluation results as versioned artifacts with dependency graphs. See the full lineage from training data to model to evaluation to production deployment.
Use Case:
Auditing which training dataset version and fine-tuning run produced the model currently serving production traffic.
Free
month
Check website for pricing
Ready to get started with Weights & Biases?
View Pricing Options →ML teams that do both traditional model training and LLM application development and want a single platform for experiment tracking across both
Teams running structured LLM evaluation pipelines who need sophisticated experiment comparison and visualization capabilities
Organizations that want collaborative data exploration with W&B Tables for reviewing and annotating LLM outputs as a team
Research teams iterating on prompts and model configurations who benefit from W&B's deep experiment versioning and lineage tracking
Weights & Biases works with these platforms and services:
We believe in transparent reviews. Here's what Weights & Biases doesn't handle well:
Weave is a product layer within W&B focused on LLM application development. It uses the same W&B account, workspace, and infrastructure. Think of it as the LLM-specific interface built on top of W&B's core experiment tracking capabilities.
W&B is broader (covering traditional ML + LLM) while Langfuse and Braintrust are deeper on LLM-specific features. W&B excels at experiment comparison and team reporting. If you only do LLM work, dedicated tools are more streamlined. If you do both ML and LLM, W&B unifies everything.
Yes, through Weave's tracing and W&B's monitoring features. However, W&B's roots are in offline experiment tracking, so real-time production alerting is less mature than dedicated monitoring tools. Many teams use W&B for evaluation and a separate tool for production monitoring.
The free tier supports small teams with limited storage and compute. The Team plan starts around $50/user/month. For 10 engineers, expect $500-1,000/month depending on usage. Enterprise pricing is custom and includes SSO, audit logs, and dedicated support.
Weekly insights on the latest AI tools, features, and trends delivered to your inbox.
People who use this tool also find these helpful
Open-source LLM observability and evaluation platform built on OpenTelemetry. Self-host it free with no feature gates, or use Arize's managed cloud.
AI observability platform with Loop agent that automatically generates better prompts, scorers, and datasets to optimize LLM applications in production.
Enterprise-grade monitoring for AI agents and LLM applications built on Datadog's infrastructure platform. Provides end-to-end tracing, cost tracking, quality evaluations, and security detection across multi-agent workflows.
API gateway and observability layer for LLM usage analytics. This analytics & monitoring provides comprehensive solutions for businesses looking to optimize their operations.
LLMOps platform for prompt engineering, evaluation, and optimization with collaborative workflows for AI product development teams.
Open-source LLM engineering platform for traces, prompts, and metrics.
See how Weights & Biases compares to CrewAI and other alternatives
View Full Comparison →AI Agent Builders
CrewAI is an open-source Python framework for orchestrating autonomous AI agents that collaborate as a team to accomplish complex tasks. You define agents with specific roles, goals, and tools, then organize them into crews with defined workflows. Agents can delegate work to each other, share context, and execute multi-step processes like market research, content creation, or data analysis. CrewAI supports sequential and parallel task execution, integrates with popular LLMs, and provides memory systems for agent learning. It's one of the most popular multi-agent frameworks with a large community and extensive documentation.
Agent Frameworks
Open-source multi-agent framework from Microsoft Research with asynchronous architecture, AutoGen Studio GUI, and OpenTelemetry observability. Now part of the unified Microsoft Agent Framework alongside Semantic Kernel.
AI Agent Builders
Graph-based stateful orchestration runtime for agent loops.
AI Agent Builders
SDK for building AI agents with planners, memory, and connectors. - Enhanced AI-powered platform providing advanced capabilities for modern development and business workflows. Features comprehensive tooling, integrations, and scalable architecture designed for professional teams and enterprise environments.
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your experience!
Get started with Weights & Biases and see if it's the right fit for your needs.
Get Started →Take our 60-second quiz to get personalized tool recommendations
Find Your Perfect AI Stack →Explore 20 ready-to-deploy AI agent templates for sales, support, dev, research, and operations.
Browse Agent Templates →