Skip to main content
aitoolsatlas.ai
BlogAbout

Explore

  • All Tools
  • Comparisons
  • Best For Guides
  • Blog

Company

  • About
  • Contact
  • Editorial Policy

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Affiliate Disclosure
Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceAffiliate DisclosureEditorial PolicyContact

© 2026 aitoolsatlas.ai. All rights reserved.

Find the right AI tool in 2 minutes. Independent reviews and honest comparisons of 890+ AI tools.

  1. Home
  2. Tools
  3. AI observability
  4. Arize Phoenix
  5. Pricing
OverviewPricingReviewWorth It?Free vs PaidDiscountAlternativesComparePros & ConsIntegrationsTutorialChangelogSecurityAPI
← Back to Arize Phoenix Overview

Arize Phoenix Pricing & Plans 2026

Complete pricing guide for Arize Phoenix. Compare all plans, analyze costs, and find the perfect tier for your needs.

Try Arize Phoenix Free →Compare Plans ↓

Not sure if free is enough? See our Free vs Paid comparison →
Still deciding? Read our full verdict on whether Arize Phoenix is worth it →

🆓Free Tier Available
💎4 Paid Plans
⚡No Setup Fees

Choose Your Plan

Phoenix open source

$0 license fee

mo

    Start Free Trial →

    AX Free

    $0

    mo

      Start Free Trial →
      Most Popular

      AX Pro

      $50/month

      mo

        Start Free Trial →

        Enterprise

        Custom

        mo

          Contact Sales →

          Pricing sourced from Arize Phoenix · Last verified March 2026

          Feature Comparison

          Detailed feature comparison coming soon. Visit Arize Phoenix's website for complete plan details.

          View Full Features →

          Is Arize Phoenix Worth It?

          ✅ Why Choose Arize Phoenix

          • • Open-source and self-hostable
          • • Trace timelines expose intermediate failures
          • • AX Free includes 25,000 monthly spans
          • • Datasets support regression testing

          ⚠️ Consider This

          • • Instrumentation and evaluator design require engineering
          • • Pro includes only 50,000 spans and 30-day retention
          • • Self-hosting shifts operations to the user
          • • Unredacted traces can capture sensitive data

          What Users Say About Arize Phoenix

          👍 What Users Love

          • ✓Open-source and self-hostable
          • ✓Trace timelines expose intermediate failures
          • ✓AX Free includes 25,000 monthly spans
          • ✓Datasets support regression testing

          👎 Common Concerns

          • ⚠Instrumentation and evaluator design require engineering
          • ⚠Pro includes only 50,000 spans and 30-day retention
          • ⚠Self-hosting shifts operations to the user
          • ⚠Unredacted traces can capture sensitive data

          Pricing FAQ

          Is Arize Phoenix really free, and what's the catch?

          Yes — Phoenix is fully open source under the Elastic License 2.0 and free to self-host with no feature restrictions, user limits, or trace volume caps. The only restriction is that you cannot offer Phoenix itself as a competing managed observability service. Arize monetizes through its commercial Arize AX enterprise platform, which adds SSO, RBAC, audit logs, SLAs, and dedicated support on top of the Phoenix core. The open-source version receives the same core tracing, evaluation, and experimentation features — there is no intentional feature gating to push users toward paid tiers.

          How is Phoenix different from LangSmith or Langfuse?

          All three provide LLM tracing and evaluation, but Phoenix is built on OpenTelemetry and OpenInference standards, making traces portable across any OTel-compatible backend (Jaeger, Grafana Tempo, Datadog). LangSmith is tightly coupled to the LangChain ecosystem and uses a proprietary tracing format, making it the fastest path for LangChain-only teams but creating vendor lock-in. Langfuse is also open source and shares Phoenix's philosophy of openness, but Phoenix offers stronger evaluation and experiment management features, deeper embedding analysis with UMAP visualizations, and benefits from Arize's sustained engineering investment. Phoenix's auto-instrumentation covers the broadest range of frameworks, while LangSmith offers the most polished UX for LangChain-specific workflows.

          What LLM frameworks and providers does Phoenix support?

          Phoenix auto-instruments LangChain, LlamaIndex, CrewAI, Haystack, DSPy, AutoGen, Semantic Kernel, and LiteLLM, plus direct SDKs for OpenAI, Anthropic, Google Vertex and Gemini, AWS Bedrock, Mistral, Cohere, and Ollama. Because Phoenix is built on OpenTelemetry, any application that emits OTel-compatible spans can send data to Phoenix, even if a dedicated auto-instrumentation library does not yet exist for that specific framework or provider. New framework integrations are added regularly as the ecosystem evolves.

          Can I use Phoenix in production, or is it only for development?

          Phoenix is designed for both development and production use. Many teams run it locally during development for rapid debugging and then deploy it via Docker or Kubernetes with PostgreSQL-backed storage for production observability. For high-volume production workloads, Arize recommends using PostgreSQL persistent storage, configuring appropriate data retention policies, and deploying with Kubernetes Helm charts for reliability and scalability. The managed Phoenix Cloud service is also available for teams that prefer not to manage their own infrastructure. Production deployments should plan for storage growth based on trace volume and configure cleanup policies accordingly.

          Does Phoenix support human annotation and dataset curation?

          Yes. Phoenix includes comprehensive workflows for annotating traces with human feedback, building and versioning datasets from production data, running experiments against those datasets, and comparing results across prompt or model variations. Annotators can label traces directly in the UI, and these annotations feed into golden datasets used for regression testing and evaluator calibration. This creates a complete feedback loop where production issues are captured, annotated, added to evaluation datasets, and then used to validate that future changes don't reintroduce the same problems. Teams can also use the annotation API to integrate human review workflows with external labeling tools.

          Ready to Get Started?

          AI builders and operators use Arize Phoenix to streamline their workflow.

          Try Arize Phoenix Now →

          More about Arize Phoenix

          ReviewAlternativesFree vs PaidPros & ConsWorth It?Tutorial

          Compare Arize Phoenix Pricing with Alternatives

          LangSmith Pricing

          LangSmith is LangChain's commercial observability, evaluation and prompt management platform for LLM apps and agents in production.

          Compare Pricing →

          Langfuse Pricing

          An open-source observability and evaluation platform for language-model applications.

          Compare Pricing →

          Helicone Pricing

          Open-source LLM observability, gateway, and cost analytics platform — proxy your OpenAI, Anthropic, or Bedrock calls through Helicone and get traces, caching, retries, rate limiting, and cost tracking in one line of code.

          Compare Pricing →

          Weights & Biases Pricing

          End-to-end MLOps and AI developer platform — Models (experiment tracking, sweeps, model registry) plus Weave (LLM/agent observability and evals) — used by frontier labs and enterprise ML teams.

          Compare Pricing →