Complete pricing guide for OpenCode. Compare all plans, analyze costs, and find the perfect tier for your needs.
Not sure if free is enough? See our Free vs Paid comparison →
Still deciding? Read our full verdict on whether OpenCode is worth it →
mo
mo
Pricing sourced from OpenCode · Last verified March 2026
Yes, OpenCode itself is fully free and open source — there is no subscription fee for the agent, the TUI, or the desktop app. However, you pay the API costs of whichever LLM provider you connect (such as Anthropic, OpenAI, or Google), and those costs are billed directly by the provider. If you run local models via Ollama, your usage is effectively free aside from hardware and electricity. This bring-your-own-key model typically saves money for heavy users compared to fixed-seat subscriptions.
OpenCode is the open source counterpart to closed tools like Claude Code and Cursor — it offers similar terminal-agent capabilities but is provider-agnostic and self-hostable. Claude Code is locked to Anthropic models and Cursor is an IDE fork with proprietary backend services, while OpenCode lets you choose from major providers directly or access many more through aggregators like OpenRouter. The tradeoff is that OpenCode requires more configuration and lacks some of the polished UX features of commercial alternatives.
Yes, OpenCode integrates with Ollama and other local model runners, so you can run agents entirely on your own hardware without sending code to any external API. This is one of the main reasons enterprise and security-conscious teams adopt it. The quality of suggestions will depend on the size and capability of your local model — a 70B parameter model will perform much better than a 7B one, but both will keep your code on-device.
LSP (Language Server Protocol) is the same standard that powers code intelligence in VS Code, Neovim, and JetBrains IDEs — it provides accurate symbol lookup, type information, and refactoring across files. OpenCode's LSP integration means the agent can resolve imports, jump to definitions, and reason about your codebase with the same context an IDE has. This significantly improves accuracy on large or polyglot projects compared to agents that only see raw text.
OpenCode is best suited for experienced developers, platform teams, and organizations with privacy or compliance requirements that prevent them from using closed-source SaaS coding assistants. It particularly shines for terminal-first developers, those already paying for LLM API access who want to avoid double-charging via per-seat subscriptions, and teams who need to audit or customize their tooling. Beginners or developers who want a polished, zero-config experience may prefer Cursor or GitHub Copilot.
AI builders and operators use OpenCode to streamline their workflow.
Try OpenCode Now →Cursor is a ai code editor focused on daily software development, large-codebase navigation.
Compare Pricing →GitHub Copilot is a AI coding assistant for everyday coding assistance, repository-aware code review and explanations.
Compare Pricing →Aider is the open-source command-line AI coding assistant that pioneered 'edit your repo from the terminal' before the GUI agents arrived. You run `aider` inside a project directory, point it at any LLM — Claude 3.7 Sonnet, GPT-4o / o3-mini, DeepSeek R1 or Chat V3, Gemini, or a local model via Ollama or LiteLLM — and chat about what you want changed. Aider builds a treesitter-powered repo map so it only sends the relevant files to the model, applies the diff, and commits the change with a sensib
Compare Pricing →Open-source autonomous coding agent for VS Code — plans, edits, runs commands and uses MCP tools with explicit human-in-the-loop approval.
Compare Pricing →