Loading tool details…
Compare listed plans and check current offer terms with LlamaParse
The catalog lists this free option; confirm its current limits and eligibility with LlamaParse
💡 Pro tip: Start with the free tier to test if LlamaParse fits your workflow before upgrading to a paid plan.
per month
per month
per month
This guide does not establish that LlamaParse has an active coupon, education discount, or seasonal promotion. Confirm current offers on the vendor's website before paying.
If LlamaParse's pricing doesn't fit your budget, consider these document ai alternatives:
IBM-originated open-source document processing software for parsing, understanding, serializing, and chunking complex documents for AI pipelines.
Free tier available
LlamaParse is positioned for complex PDFs and visually rich documents, especially cases involving tables, figures, and layout-aware output for AI workflows. Unstructured may be a better fit when teams want broader open-source-style document partitioning, local pipeline control, or high-volume document ETL. Use LlamaParse when managed, LLM-ready parsing quality matters; evaluate Unstructured when control, deployment flexibility, or pipeline customization is the priority.
The verified public pricing page lists the Free plan at $0/month with 10,000 credits, 1 user, 5 concurrent parse jobs, 5 indexes, 50 files per index, and community/basic support. That can be enough for evaluation, prototypes, and small workloads. Applications processing user-uploaded documents at scale should compare Starter at $50/month with 40,000 credits and Pro at $500/month with 400,000 credits, then model costs using the public credit rate of 1,000 credits = $1.25 and the parsing modes they expect to use.
Yes. LlamaIndex's developer documentation describes API and SDK usage for the LlamaParse platform. The LlamaIndex integration adds convenience for users already in that ecosystem, but parsed outputs such as markdown, text, JSON, XLSX, HTML tables, or annotated PDFs can be used in downstream applications and workflows.
Processing time depends on document length, layout complexity, parsing mode, and workload conditions. Simple documents should generally be faster than large files with tables, figures, scans, or handwriting. For production systems, teams should design around asynchronous processing and validate latency against their own document samples.
Azure Document Intelligence is a strong fit for Microsoft cloud customers and established form or document intelligence workflows. LlamaParse is more directly positioned around LLM-ready parsing, RAG, document agents, markdown and JSON outputs, and complex multimodal documents. Teams should compare them using representative documents, security requirements, deployment needs, and current pricing.
Docling is an open-source alternative from IBM that can run locally and may be attractive for cost-sensitive or self-managed document conversion. LlamaParse is more suitable when a managed service, schema extraction, agentic OCR, enterprise controls, and LlamaIndex or LlamaCloud integration are priorities.
Start with the free tier and upgrade when you need more features
Get Started with LlamaParse →Listed prices may change. Confirm current prices and offer terms with the vendor.