No free plan. The cheapest way in is paid plan at varies. Consider free alternatives in the legal ai category if budget is tight.
Legora and Harvey both target legal AI workflows for law firms, but this record should not be treated as proof of feature parity. Legora's visible positioning emphasizes document review, contract analysis, drafting, Word integration, and agentic workflows. Buyers should compare exact practice-area support, source coverage, security terms, integrations, implementation process, and pricing directly.
Legora does not publish exact pricing in the provided visible content. The only supported pricing conclusion from this record is enterprise contact-for-pricing. Buyers should request a written quote that specifies per-seat or platform fees, usage limits, implementation costs, minimum seats, trial or pilot terms, contract length, renewal terms, and any discount conditions.
Public sources reference integrations or partnerships involving iManage, SharePoint, NetDocuments, and Datasite, but buyers should verify the exact integration scope, permissions model, indexing behavior, data residency, and supported deployment process during procurement.
Legora is primarily positioned for professional law firm workflows and enterprise sales. Small firms and solo practitioners should confirm pricing minimums and onboarding requirements before investing time in evaluation, because the provided content does not show a self-serve plan.
The visible record identifies Legora as the current product name. Any former company or product name, funding amount, valuation, or rebrand history should be verified from primary sources before being used in procurement materials.
See Legora plans and find the right tier for your needs.
See Pricing Plans →Still not sure? Read our full verdict →
Last verified March 2026