Skip to main content
aitoolsatlas.ai
BlogAbout

Explore

  • All Tools
  • Comparisons
  • Best For Guides
  • Blog

Company

  • About
  • Contact
  • Editorial Policy

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Affiliate Disclosure
Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceAffiliate DisclosureEditorial PolicyContact

© 2026 aitoolsatlas.ai. All rights reserved.

Find the right AI tool in 2 minutes. Independent reviews and honest comparisons of 890+ AI tools.

  1. Home
  2. Tools
  3. Langtrace
OverviewPricingReviewWorth It?Free vs PaidDiscountAlternativesComparePros & ConsIntegrationsTutorialChangelogSecurityAPI
Analytics & Monitoring🔴Developer
L

Langtrace

Langtrace: Open-source observability platform for LLM applications and AI agents with OpenTelemetry-based tracing, cost tracking, and performance analytics across 8+ model providers and 10+ frameworks.

Starting atFree
Visit Langtrace →
💡

In Plain English

Open-source monitoring for AI apps — see exactly what your AI is doing with detailed tracing and performance metrics.

OverviewFeaturesPricingGetting StartedUse CasesIntegrationsLimitationsFAQAlternatives

Overview

Langtrace is an open-source observability and evaluation platform purpose-built for LLM applications, AI agents, and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) pipelines. It provides detailed distributed tracing, cost analytics, and quality evaluation capabilities that help engineering teams understand exactly what their AI systems are doing in production, how much they cost, and how well they perform.

At its core, Langtrace is built natively on the OpenTelemetry standard, which means every trace and span it generates conforms to OTLP conventions and can be exported to any compatible backend — Grafana, Datadog, Signoz, or your own collector. This vendor-neutral approach sets it apart from observability tools that lock telemetry into proprietary formats. For platform teams already running OpenTelemetry infrastructure for microservices, Langtrace slots into the existing stack rather than creating a parallel silo.

The platform auto-instruments 8 major LLM providers (OpenAI, Anthropic, Google Gemini, Cohere, Groq, Mistral, Perplexity, and Ollama) and over 10 orchestration frameworks and vector databases including LangChain, LlamaIndex, LangGraph, CrewAI, DSPy, AutoGen, Pinecone, Chroma, Weaviate, and Qdrant. Instrumentation requires just two lines of code — import the SDK and call init — after which every LLM call, tool invocation, embedding query, and vector retrieval is captured automatically with full prompt and completion content, token counts, latency, and cost.

Cost tracking is a first-class feature. Dashboards aggregate spend by model, user, project, prompt template, and time window, making it straightforward to identify which features or tenants are driving the largest portion of an AI bill. Teams report using this data to set budget alerts, negotiate model pricing, and justify optimization investments to finance stakeholders.

For evaluation and quality management, Langtrace lets teams promote production traces into curated datasets, annotate them with human feedback, run prompt experiments across model versions, and score outputs using built-in evaluators for accuracy, faithfulness, toxicity, and custom metrics. This closes the loop between observability and iteration — instead of treating monitoring and evaluation as separate workflows, teams can move from a suspicious trace to a scored experiment in a few clicks.

The self-hosted deployment option is a significant differentiator for regulated industries. The server is AGPL-3.0 licensed while the SDKs are Apache-2.0, and a Docker Compose file launches the full stack (server, Postgres, ClickHouse) in minutes. Healthcare, finance, and government teams that cannot send raw prompts to third-party SaaS providers can run Langtrace entirely within their own VPC while maintaining standard OpenTelemetry compatibility.

The managed Cloud offering starts with a free tier (50,000 traces/month, 30-day retention), scales through a Pro plan at $59/month (up to 1 million spans included, ~$0.20 per 1,000 additional spans, 90-day retention), and offers custom Enterprise agreements with single-tenant deployment, SOC2 documentation, and SLAs. This tiered approach makes Langtrace accessible to individual developers prototyping an agent as well as platform teams running production workloads at scale.

🎨

Vibe Coding Friendly?

▼
Difficulty:intermediate

Suitability for vibe coding depends on your experience level and the specific use case.

Learn about Vibe Coding →

Was this helpful?

Key Features

OpenTelemetry-native trace ingestion+

All Langtrace spans conform to the emerging OpenTelemetry GenAI semantic conventions, so prompts, completions, token counts, model parameters, tool calls, and retrieval results are stored in standardized attributes. This means traces can be exported via OTLP to Grafana Tempo, Datadog, Signoz, Jaeger, or any compliant backend without transformation, giving teams full portability over their telemetry data and avoiding vendor lock-in.

Auto-instrumentation SDKs for Python and TypeScript+

Initialization takes two lines: import the SDK and call init with an API key. Every supported LLM, framework, and vector DB call is then traced automatically with full prompt content, completion text, token counts, latency, and cost — no manual span creation required. The Python SDK supports OpenAI, Anthropic, Gemini, Cohere, Groq, Mistral, Perplexity, Ollama, LangChain, LlamaIndex, CrewAI, DSPy, AutoGen, Pinecone, Chroma, Weaviate, and Qdrant. The TypeScript SDK covers a similar set of providers and frameworks.

Cost, token, and latency analytics+

Aggregated dashboards display cost per model, user, project, prompt template, and time range, alongside p50/p95/p99 latency for individual operations and full traces. Cost is calculated automatically using each provider's published token pricing. Teams use these dashboards to set budget alerts, identify cost spikes from specific features or tenants, and present attribution data to finance stakeholders for AI infrastructure spend.

Prompt playground and experiments+

Saved prompts can be versioned, edited, and tested across multiple models in a side-by-side playground. Experiment results are persisted so teams can compare output quality, latency, and cost across model versions and prompt variations before deploying changes to production. This workflow supports systematic prompt engineering rather than ad-hoc testing in notebooks.

Datasets, annotations, and evaluations+

Any production trace can be added to a dataset, labeled by human annotators, and run through built-in or custom evaluators measuring accuracy, faithfulness, toxicity, JSON schema compliance, and other quality metrics. Custom evaluator functions can be defined in Python for domain-specific scoring. This creates a feedback loop where production issues are captured, annotated, evaluated, and used to validate fixes before redeployment.

Self-hosted deployment via Docker+

A single Docker Compose file launches the server, Postgres for metadata, and ClickHouse for high-performance trace storage. Kubernetes Helm charts are available for production deployments that require horizontal scaling. Self-hosted instances receive all features available in the managed Cloud offering, with the only trade-off being that teams manage their own infrastructure, upgrades, and backups.

Team and project management+

Workspaces, projects, role-based access control, and API key scoping let larger organizations separate staging from production traffic and limit which team members can access sensitive trace data. This is essential for enterprise deployments where multiple teams share a single Langtrace instance but need isolation between their observability data and configurations.

Pricing Plans

Free / Open Source

$0

    Cloud Free

    $0

      Cloud Pro

      Starting at $59/month

        Enterprise

        Custom

          See Full Pricing →Free vs Paid →Is it worth it? →

          Ready to get started with Langtrace?

          View Pricing Options →

          Getting Started with Langtrace

          1. 1Sign up for a free Langtrace account at langtrace.ai or choose self-hosted deployment
          2. 2Install the Langtrace SDK for your programming language (pip install langtrace-python-sdk or npm install langtrace)
          3. 3Initialize the SDK in your application with your project API key using Langtrace.init()
          4. 4Run your LLM application — traces will automatically appear in the Langtrace dashboard
          5. 5Explore the waterfall visualizations and cost tracking to optimize your agent performance
          Ready to start? Try Langtrace →

          Best Use Cases

          🎯

          Debugging multi-step AI agents

          Tracing CrewAI, LangGraph, or AutoGen agents where understanding tool calls, retries, and intermediate reasoning across spans is essential to fix loops, hallucinations, or unexpected behavior. The waterfall trace visualization shows the full execution graph with timing, token counts, and cost for each step, making it straightforward to pinpoint where an agent goes off track.

          ⚡

          Cost governance for production LLM features

          Tracking token spend per user, tenant, or feature in B2B SaaS so finance and engineering can attribute OpenAI and Anthropic bills and enforce budget alerts. Per-request cost is calculated automatically using each provider's pricing, and dashboards aggregate spend by model, project, and time window to surface optimization opportunities and prevent cost overruns.

          🔧

          RAG pipeline performance tuning

          Inspecting embedding queries, vector retrieval latency, reranker behavior, and final completion quality in a single trace to optimize chunking and retrieval strategies. The end-to-end trace shows exactly which documents were retrieved, how long each step took, and whether the final response was grounded in the retrieved context, enabling data-driven tuning of the entire RAG pipeline.

          🚀

          Self-hosted observability for regulated industries

          Healthcare, finance, and government teams that cannot send raw prompts to third-party SaaS can run Langtrace inside their own VPC while keeping standard OpenTelemetry compatibility. The Docker Compose deployment includes all components needed for production use, and the AGPL license allows free self-hosting without per-seat or per-trace fees.

          💡

          Continuous evaluation in CI/CD

          Capturing production traces, promoting them into evaluation datasets, and running scored prompt experiments before shipping new model versions or prompt changes. Teams can integrate evaluations into their deployment pipeline to catch quality regressions before they reach users, using both automated evaluators and human annotation workflows.

          🔄

          Unifying GenAI telemetry with existing APM

          Platform teams already using Grafana, Datadog, or Signoz can route Langtrace OTLP data into the same dashboards used for microservices, avoiding a separate observability silo for AI features. This is especially valuable for organizations that have standardized on OpenTelemetry and want AI application telemetry to follow the same conventions and pipelines as the rest of their infrastructure.

          Integration Ecosystem

          28 integrations

          Langtrace works with these platforms and services:

          🧠 LLM Providers
          OpenAIAnthropicGoogle GeminiCohereGroqMistralPerplexityOllama
          📊 Vector Databases
          PineconeChromaWeaviateQdrant
          ☁️ Cloud Platforms
          AWSGCPAzure
          💬 Communication
          Email
          🗄️ Databases
          PostgresClickHouse
          📈 Monitoring
          GrafanaDatadogSignoz
          🔗 Other
          apiLangChainLlamaIndexLangGraphCrewAIDSPyAutoGen
          View full Integration Matrix →

          Limitations & What It Can't Do

          We believe in transparent reviews. Here's what Langtrace doesn't handle well:

          • ⚠Langtrace focuses on observability and lightweight evaluation rather than full ML experiment tracking, so teams doing heavy model training or fine-tuning will still need dedicated MLOps platforms like Weights & Biases or MLflow. The evaluation suite, while functional for common use cases, does not match the depth of specialized evaluation platforms for complex multi-turn agent scoring or large-scale human annotation campaigns. The UI is optimized for developer workflows and lacks pre-built dashboards for non-technical stakeholders. Very high-volume deployments (millions of spans per day) may require tuning ClickHouse resources and implementing sampling strategies to maintain query performance.

          Pros & Cons

          ✓ Pros

          • ✓True OpenTelemetry-native instrumentation: Emits standard OTLP traces and spans, so data can be routed to Grafana, Datadog, Signoz, or any OTel backend without rewriting collectors or losing data fidelity. Teams already invested in OpenTelemetry infrastructure can unify GenAI telemetry with existing microservice observability rather than maintaining a separate system.
          • ✓Broad framework and model coverage: Auto-instruments 8 LLM providers (OpenAI, Anthropic, Gemini, Cohere, Groq, Mistral, Perplexity, Ollama) and over 10 frameworks and vector databases including LangChain, LlamaIndex, LangGraph, CrewAI, DSPy, AutoGen, Pinecone, Chroma, Weaviate, and Qdrant. This breadth covers most production GenAI stacks without requiring custom instrumentation.
          • ✓Self-hostable open-source core: AGPL-licensed server with Docker Compose deploy means regulated teams can run Langtrace inside their own VPC. The SDK itself is Apache-2.0 to ease commercial integration concerns. This dual-license model gives enterprises the flexibility to instrument applications freely while maintaining data sovereignty over the observability backend.
          • ✓Cost and token analytics per model and session: Built-in dashboards break down spend and token usage by model, user, project, and time window, which is concrete enough to drive budget alerts and provide finance teams with attribution data for AI infrastructure costs. Per-request cost is calculated automatically using each provider's pricing, removing the need for manual tracking spreadsheets.
          • ✓Integrated evaluation and dataset workflows: Production traces can be promoted into evaluation datasets, annotated with human feedback, and scored using built-in or custom evaluators, closing the loop between monitoring and prompt or model iteration. This eliminates the friction of exporting data to a separate evaluation tool and keeps the quality feedback cycle within the same platform.
          • ✓Lightweight setup with minimal code changes: Two-line SDK initialization captures full prompt, completion, tool call, and vector DB telemetry without requiring developers to wrap each LLM call manually. This low-friction onboarding means teams can start collecting observability data in minutes rather than spending days instrumenting their codebase.

          ✗ Cons

          • ✗Younger ecosystem than incumbents: Community size, plugin marketplace, and third-party tutorials are smaller than Langfuse or Datadog, so edge-case issues can require digging into source code or waiting for maintainer responses. The ecosystem is growing but teams accustomed to extensive community resources may find fewer readily available guides and integrations.
          • ✗AGPL license on the server: Self-hosting the full Langtrace server under AGPL can raise legal review concerns at enterprises that prohibit copyleft for modified internal forks. Organizations that need to customize the server code should consult legal counsel about AGPL obligations, or use the managed Cloud offering to avoid license concerns entirely.
          • ✗Evaluation tooling is less mature than specialists: Built-in evals cover common cases but lack the depth of dedicated platforms like Braintrust or Arize, particularly for complex agent trajectory scoring, custom rubric pipelines, or large-scale human annotation workflows. Teams with advanced evaluation requirements may still need a complementary specialized tool.
          • ✗UI can lag on very high-volume workloads: Teams instrumenting millions of spans per day report that querying long time ranges in the hosted UI can be slow without tuning retention and sampling strategies. Self-hosted deployments can mitigate this by scaling ClickHouse resources, but the default configuration is optimized for moderate volumes.
          • ✗Limited no-code/business-user surface: Langtrace is engineer-oriented; product managers or non-technical stakeholders will find fewer pre-built reports and visualization options compared with marketing-focused analytics tools. Sharing insights with business teams typically requires exporting data or building custom dashboards outside the platform.

          Frequently Asked Questions

          Is Langtrace really open source, and what license does it use?+

          Yes. The Langtrace server is released under the AGPL-3.0 license, while the client SDKs are licensed under Apache-2.0. This means you can freely self-host the server and use the SDKs in commercial applications. The AGPL license requires that modifications to the server be shared if you distribute the modified version, but using the hosted Cloud offering avoids any license considerations entirely. The Apache-2.0 SDK license places no copyleft obligations on your application code.

          How does Langtrace differ from Langfuse or Helicone?+

          Langtrace is built natively on the OpenTelemetry standard, so traces are portable to any OTel backend such as Grafana, Datadog, or Signoz. Langfuse uses a custom schema with its own ingestion format, which provides a polished experience within its ecosystem but creates more vendor lock-in for telemetry data. Helicone operates primarily as an API proxy logger that is extremely easy to set up but has less visibility into multi-step agent workflows and framework internals. Langtrace's OTel-native approach is best suited for teams that already have observability infrastructure and want GenAI tracing to integrate with it seamlessly.

          Which models, frameworks, and vector databases does Langtrace support?+

          It auto-instruments 8 LLM providers: OpenAI, Anthropic, Google Gemini, Cohere, Groq, Mistral, Perplexity, and Ollama. Orchestration frameworks include LangChain, LlamaIndex, LangGraph, CrewAI, DSPy, and AutoGen. Supported vector databases include Pinecone, Chroma, Weaviate, and Qdrant. The SDK architecture is extensible, so additional providers and frameworks are added regularly as the ecosystem grows. Custom instrumentation is also supported through manual span creation for unsupported libraries.

          Can I deploy Langtrace inside my own infrastructure?+

          Yes. Langtrace ships a Docker Compose setup and Kubernetes Helm charts so the server, Postgres database, ClickHouse analytics store, and UI can run in your own VPC or on-premises environment. This is particularly valuable for healthcare, finance, and government teams that cannot send raw prompts and completions to third-party SaaS providers. Self-hosted deployments receive all core features including tracing, evaluations, cost tracking, and dataset management at no licensing cost.

          Does Langtrace support evaluations and dataset management?+

          Yes. You can curate datasets from real production traces, annotate them with human feedback, run prompt experiments across model versions, and score outputs using built-in evaluators for accuracy, faithfulness, toxicity, and JSON schema compliance. Custom evaluator functions are also supported. This workflow enables teams to go from observing a production issue to running a scored experiment that validates a fix, all within the same platform without exporting data to external tools.
          🦞

          New to AI tools?

          Read practical guides for choosing and using AI tools

          Read Guides →

          Get updates on Langtrace and 370+ other AI tools

          Weekly insights on the latest AI tools, features, and trends delivered to your inbox.

          No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

          What's New in 2026

          Through 2025 and into 2026 Langtrace expanded coverage of agentic frameworks, adding deeper LangGraph, CrewAI, AutoGen, and DSPy instrumentation and aligning trace attributes with the evolving OpenTelemetry GenAI semantic conventions. The evaluation suite gained support for custom Python evaluator functions and side-by-side prompt experiment comparisons across models. Cost analytics dashboards were enhanced with per-tenant and per-feature attribution views. The self-hosted deployment experience improved with Kubernetes Helm charts alongside the existing Docker Compose setup. SDK coverage expanded to include additional vector databases and model providers, and the TypeScript SDK reached feature parity with the Python SDK for most supported integrations.

          Alternatives to Langtrace

          Langfuse

          LLM Observability

          Langfuse is an open-source LLM observability and engineering platform providing tracing, prompt management, evaluations, and dataset management for production AI applications.

          Helicone

          LLM Observability

          Open-source LLM observability and AI gateway — logs every prompt, response, cost, and latency across 20+ providers with a one-line proxy or async SDK, plus caching, retries, and prompt experiments.

          Arize Phoenix

          AI Observability

          Phoenix is Arize's open-source LLM observability project, and it has quietly become the default way tens of thousands of teams see what their agents are actually doing in production. The pitch is simple: `pip install arize-phoenix`, instrument with OpenInference (or any OpenTelemetry-compatible library), and every LLM call, tool invocation, retrieval, and embedding shows up as a spanned timeline you can filter, search, and replay. No vendor account required, no proprietary SDK lock-in. The Open

          AgentOps

          Enterprise Agents

          Developer platform for AI agent observability, debugging, and cost tracking with two-line SDK integration.

          View All Alternatives & Detailed Comparison →

          User Reviews

          No reviews yet. Be the first to share your experience!

          Quick Info

          Category

          Analytics & Monitoring

          Website

          www.langtrace.ai
          🔄Compare with alternatives →

          Try Langtrace Today

          Get started with Langtrace and see if it's the right fit for your needs.

          Get Started →

          Need help choosing the right AI stack?

          Take our 60-second quiz to get personalized tool recommendations

          Find Your Perfect AI Stack →

          Want a faster launch?

          Explore 20 ready-to-deploy AI agent templates for sales, support, dev, research, and operations.

          Browse Agent Templates →

          More about Langtrace

          PricingReviewAlternativesFree vs PaidPros & ConsWorth It?Tutorial