AI code review agent that reads your entire codebase, comments on every PR with senior-engineer feedback, and learns your team's conventions.
AI code review agent that reads your entire codebase, comments on every PR with senior-engineer feedback, and learns your team's conventions.
Greptile is the AI code review agent that GitHub PRs have been asking for. Instead of generic, line-by-line suggestions, Greptile indexes your full repository — every commit, every dependency graph, every internal convention — and uses that context to leave the kind of review comments a thoughtful senior engineer would: 'this bypasses the auth middleware we added last month', 'this duplicates logic already in utils/billing.ts', 'this regex won't match the email format you allow in onboarding'. The agent integrates with GitHub, GitLab and Bitbucket; it posts a summary on every PR, flags specific risks, suggests inline patches, and learns from how teams accept or reject feedback. Greptile also ships a chat interface for asking questions about the codebase ('where does the trial-end webhook fire?', 'why did we move email to Postmark?') and a query API so other agents can ground their work in your code. Pricing starts free for individuals and open-source projects, with team plans starting around \$30/user/month and enterprise tiers including SOC 2, self-hosted indexing and dedicated support. Greptile has become the go-to choice for teams that want PR review automation that actually understands their codebase rather than producing generic LGTM noise.
Was this helpful?
Feature information is available on the official website.
View Features →$0
From $30/user/month
Contact sales
Ready to get started with Greptile?
View Pricing Options →Weekly insights on the latest AI tools, features, and trends delivered to your inbox.
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your experience!
Get started with Greptile and see if it's the right fit for your needs.
Get Started →Take our 60-second quiz to get personalized tool recommendations
Find Your Perfect AI Stack →Explore 20 ready-to-deploy AI agent templates for sales, support, dev, research, and operations.
Browse Agent Templates →Two years ago, picking an AI coding assistant meant choosing between a handful of autocomplete plugins. In 2026, the **cursor vs github copilot** decision affects how your entire team writes, reviews, and ships code. Both tools have added agentic capabilities, background task run
The average developer now spends between 30% and 55% of their working hours on tasks that AI can accelerate — code completion, test generation, debugging, and documentation. A [2025 GitHub survey](https://github.blog/news-insights/research/survey-ai-wave-grows/) found that 97%
Compare the top AI coding agents in 2026 — Claude Code, Cursor, Copilot, Codex, Windsurf, Aider, and more. Real pricing, honest strengths, and a decision framework for every skill level.