Open-source AI memory platform that turns unstructured data into a knowledge graph for agents, with a managed cloud and MCP integration.
Open-source AI memory platform that turns unstructured data into a knowledge graph for agents, with a managed cloud and MCP integration.
Cognee is an open-source memory engine that gives AI agents a structured, queryable picture of their world rather than a flat vector store. You feed Cognee text, PDFs, audio, code, or arbitrary documents and it runs a pipeline that extracts entities, relationships, and temporal facts into a knowledge graph backed by your choice of vector and graph databases (Neo4j, Postgres+pgvector, FalkorDB, Qdrant, Pinecone, LanceDB, and more). At query time agents get back a hybrid bundle of graph traversals plus semantic chunks, which produces noticeably more accurate answers than vector-only RAG on the kinds of multi-hop, entity-rich questions that real users actually ask. The platform is built around a Python SDK and a REST API; integrations exist for LangChain, LlamaIndex, Mastra, and Vercel AI SDK. Critically for the MCP wave, Cognee ships an official MCP server so any MCP-aware client (Claude Desktop, Cursor, Goose, OpenAI Agents SDK) can store and recall memories in a shared graph with one config line. Pricing has a generous Free open-source tier you can self-host, then managed cloud plans at roughly $35/month (Starter), $100/month (Pro), and $750/month (Team/Scale), with Enterprise on a custom contract for private deployments and SLAs. Teams use Cognee for research agents, personal AI products, customer support memory, regulated-industry assistants, and any setup where a knowledge graph beats raw embeddings.
Was this helpful?
Cognee brings knowledge graph construction to AI memory, using graph databases (Neo4j) to store relationships between entities rather than just vector similarity. This graph-based approach excels at complex reasoning over interconnected information. The pipeline for extracting and structuring knowledge from documents is well-designed. Still an early-stage project with a small community, limited documentation, and fewer production deployments. Best for teams that need relationship-aware memory and are comfortable with emerging tools.
The core cognee.cognify() function processes raw text through chunking, entity extraction, relationship identification, and graph storage in a single call. Each stage is a composable Python task that can be swapped or extended, letting you customize behavior without rewriting the pipeline. This makes the simplest case (ingest a PDF and query it) trivially easy while keeping advanced customization within reach.
Cognee stores every ingested entity in both a graph database (Neo4j, Kuzu, or NetworkX) and a vector store (Qdrant, LanceDB, pgvector, Weaviate, or Milvus). Retrieval can combine graph traversal for relational queries with vector similarity for semantic search, giving you flexibility to answer different question types from the same knowledge base. This dual representation is the key technical differentiator versus pure-vector RAG frameworks.
You can define domain-specific schemas as Pydantic DataPoint subclasses — for example, a Patient class with fields for diagnoses, medications, and providers. The pipeline uses these schemas to guide structured extraction from documents, producing typed entities rather than generic strings. This is critical for regulated domains where extracted data feeds downstream systems requiring strict typing and validation.
Cognee integrates with 30+ LLM providers through LiteLLM, including OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Azure, AWS Bedrock, Groq, Ollama, and self-hosted models. You can mix providers across the pipeline — for example, using a cheaper model for chunking and a stronger model for entity extraction. This flexibility avoids vendor lock-in and lets teams optimize cost vs quality per pipeline stage.
The hosted cloud tier provides a dashboard for graph exploration, pipeline monitoring, and data source management without requiring teams to operate Neo4j or vector infrastructure themselves. It includes visualization of the knowledge graph, ingestion job tracking, and team collaboration features. This bridges the gap for teams that want Cognee's capabilities without the DevOps burden of self-hosting the full stack.
$0
$35/mo
$100/mo
$750/mo
Custom
Ready to get started with Cognee?
View Pricing Options →Cognee works with these platforms and services:
We believe in transparent reviews. Here's what Cognee doesn't handle well:
Weekly insights on the latest AI tools, features, and trends delivered to your inbox.
Recent releases have expanded backend support to include Kuzu as an embedded graph database, added more vector store integrations (LanceDB, Milvus), and improved ontology-driven extraction with custom Pydantic DataPoint schemas. The managed Cognee Cloud platform has continued to mature with dashboard improvements for graph exploration and pipeline monitoring.
AI agent framework
LlamaIndex is an open-source Python and TypeScript framework for building RAG, document workflows, and AI agents — with LlamaCloud for managed parsing, extraction, and indexing.
AI Agent Builders
The industry-standard framework for building production-ready LLM applications with comprehensive tool integration, agent orchestration, and enterprise observability through LangSmith.
AI agent memory
Memory infrastructure for AI agents and applications, available as an open-source framework and managed platform.
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your experience!
Get started with Cognee and see if it's the right fit for your needs.
Get Started →Take our 60-second quiz to get personalized tool recommendations
Find Your Perfect AI Stack →Explore 20 ready-to-deploy AI agent templates for sales, support, dev, research, and operations.
Browse Agent Templates →