Stay free if you only need 1 bot included and 500 incoming messages/month. Upgrade if you need everything in plus and multi-seat collaboration and roles. Most solo builders can start free.
Why it matters: Usage-based pricing adds up: messages, table rows, bots, and always-alive each cost extra beyond plan limits
Available from: Plus
Why it matters: Advanced integrations and custom logic require JavaScript, so non-technical teams will hit walls
Available from: Plus
Why it matters: Self-hosted deployments need you to manage infrastructure, updates, and scaling yourself
Available from: Plus
Why it matters: Free tier limits you to 1 bot and 500 messages/month, which runs out fast in production
Available from: Plus
Why it matters: Chat quality depends on which LLM you connect, and Botpress doesn't fine-tune or optimize model output
Available from: Plus
The free tier gives you 1 bot, 500 messages/month, and $5 in AI credits. Plus starts at $89/month with higher message limits, analytics, and human handoff, while Team is $495/month for collaboration features. Real costs scale with usage: extra messages, extra bots, table rows, and AI spend (billed at provider rates) stack on top. Based on our analysis of 870+ AI tools, a mid-volume support bot on Botpress typically lands at $30-100/month total, which is still well below Intercom Fin's per-resolution pricing.
Yes. The open-source version runs on your own servers via Docker, and you handle infrastructure, updates, and scaling yourself. You still pay for LLM API calls to providers like OpenAI or Anthropic, since those are external. Cloud-exclusive features like the hosted control plane and managed integrations aren't available on self-hosted, and after the 2025 $25M Series B raise, most new features land on cloud first. If you're picking Botpress specifically for self-hosting, verify the features you need exist in the open-source build before committing.
Botpress offers more developer flexibility, self-hosting, and transparent pass-through AI pricing. Voiceflow has a more polished no-code experience and stronger prototyping tools for product designers. If your team includes a developer and wants infrastructure control, Botpress wins. If your team is purely no-code or focused on conversational design rather than integration, Voiceflow is easier. Compared to the four other chatbot platforms in our directory's alternatives list, Botpress sits at the most technical end of the spectrum.
You can build basic FAQ bots and simple flows using only the visual Agent Studio. Anything involving API calls to your own systems, custom data processing, or complex conditional logic requires JavaScript inside Botpress code blocks. Knowledge base setup, channel deployment, and human handoff configuration are all no-code. Plan on having a developer available for any production bot that touches internal systems — most teams report needing JS for at least 20-30% of a real deployment.
Not natively. Botpress focuses on text-based channels: web chat, WhatsApp, Instagram, Messenger, Slack, Microsoft Teams, and Discord. You can integrate with voice platforms like Twilio or Vapi via APIs, but there's no built-in voice or telephony layer. For voice-first use cases, dedicated platforms like Vapi or Retell are a better starting point, with Botpress potentially handling the conversational logic via webhooks.
Start with the free plan — upgrade when you need more.
Get Started Free →Still not sure? Read our full verdict →
Last verified March 2026