Skip to main content
aitoolsatlas.ai
BlogAbout

Explore

  • All Tools
  • Comparisons
  • Best For Guides
  • Blog

Company

  • About
  • Contact
  • Editorial Policy

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Affiliate Disclosure
Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceAffiliate DisclosureEditorial PolicyContact

© 2026 aitoolsatlas.ai. All rights reserved.

Find the right AI tool in 2 minutes. Independent reviews and honest comparisons of 890+ AI tools.

  1. Home
  2. Tools
  3. Amp
OverviewPricingReviewWorth It?Free vs PaidDiscountAlternativesComparePros & ConsIntegrationsTutorialChangelogSecurityAPI
AI coding assistant
A

Amp

Amp is Sourcegraph’s frontier coding agent for professional developers who want CLI-first automation, long-running agent workflows, MCP-connected tooling, plugins, and pay-as-you-go individual pricing. It is better suited to serious engineering teams than casual coding help because its value depends on terminal workflows, workspace policy, and agent supervision.

Starting at$0 subscription; paid credits required after free/interactive allowance
Visit Amp →
💡

In Plain English

Amp is Sourcegraph’s frontier coding agent for professional developers who want CLI-first automation, long-running agent workflows, MCP-connected tooling, plugins, and pay-as-you-go individual pricing. It is better suited to serious engineering teams than casual coding help because its value depends on terminal workflows, workspace policy, and agent supervision.

OverviewFeaturesPricingUse CasesLimitationsFAQ

Overview

Amp is Sourcegraph’s frontier coding agent for professional developers and engineering teams that want CLI-first automation, long-running agent workflows, MCP-connected tooling, workspace plugins, cross-surface supervision, and pay-as-you-go pricing instead of relying only on a simple autocomplete assistant or a predictable fixed-seat coding subscription.

The website positions Amp as a "frontier coding agent" built for leading models and for whatever comes next in model capability. Its core workflow starts with the Amp CLI, which can be installed on Mac, Linux, WSL, Windows, or through Homebrew, then used to start agents in the terminal and continue from other surfaces. The June 4, 2026 "Agents, Everywhere" update says Amp agents can be watched and driven from web, CLI, and mobile, and the homepage specifically notes that teams can enforce passkey-authenticated "sudo" sessions for remote control. Source: https://ampcode.com/news/agents-everywhere and https://ampcode.com

Amp's differentiator is not just model access, but the way it wraps those models in an opinionated workflow. The site says Amp is tuned to stay responsive on the largest threads teams are working with today, and its June 5, 2026 performance note says first token arrival is 87% faster and entire responses are 32% faster at p50 in deep and rush modes, with up to a 40% end-to-end speedup on long-horizon tasks. Those are vendor claims rather than independent benchmark results, but they are specific enough to explain what Amp is optimizing for: longer coding tasks where latency, responsiveness, and continuity matter. Source: https://ampcode.com/news/faster-deep-rush

The extensibility story is also important. Amp plugins can hook into events, add tools, standardize policy, and be deployed to a workspace. The May 28, 2026 update says plugins can show UI elements on the web, including notifications, confirmation dialogs, input fields, and select elements. Combined with documented MCP support for local or remote MCP servers, Amp is positioned for teams that want the coding agent to connect with internal systems instead of operating as an isolated chat box. Source: https://ampcode.com/news/plugins-everywhere and https://ampcode.com/manual#mcp

Pricing is clear in mechanics but not a fixed subscription. Amp says individuals and non-enterprise workspaces pay pass-through provider API costs with zero markup, no subscription, no commitment, and a $5 minimum credit purchase. Enterprise usage is 50% more expensive than individual and team plans, and Enterprise setup requires a one-time $1,000 USD purchase that grants $1,000 USD of Enterprise usage. That makes Amp easier to try as an individual, but budgeting for larger teams depends on expected model and tool usage rather than a fixed per-seat list price. Source: https://ampcode.com/manual#pricing

🎨

Vibe Coding Friendly?

▼
Difficulty:intermediate

Suitability for vibe coding depends on your experience level and the specific use case.

Learn about Vibe Coding →

Was this helpful?

Key Features

CLI-first coding agents+

Amp can be installed as a CLI and used to start agents directly from the terminal. The website lists support for Mac, Linux, WSL, Windows, and Homebrew, making it practical for developers who work across common local development environments. Source: https://ampcode.com/manual#get-started

Agents across web, CLI, and mobile+

The June 4, 2026 "Agents, Everywhere" update says users can watch and drive Amp agents from web, CLI, and mobile. This is useful for long-running coding tasks because the developer does not have to stay in one terminal session to supervise the agent. Source: https://ampcode.com/news/agents-everywhere

Responsive long-running sessions+

Amp says modern agent runs get long and that the product is tuned to stay responsive on the largest threads teams are using today. Its June 5, 2026 update reports 87% faster first-token arrival and 32% faster full responses at p50 in deep and rush modes, with up to a 40% end-to-end improvement on long-horizon work. Source: https://ampcode.com/news/faster-deep-rush

Workspace plugins+

Amp plugins can hook into events, add tools, standardize policy, and be deployed to a workspace. The May 28, 2026 update says plugins can show UI elements on the web, including notifications, confirmation dialogs, input fields, and select elements. Source: https://ampcode.com/news/plugins-everywhere

Team control with passkey sudo sessions+

The homepage says teams can enforce passkey-authenticated sudo sessions for web and mobile remote control. The manual also says workspace admins can require Use Sudo for all workspace members. That matters for organizations that want developers to use remote agent control without leaving privileged actions completely unconstrained. Source: https://ampcode.com and https://ampcode.com/manual#remote-control

Pricing Plans

Free start

$0 subscription; paid credits required after free/interactive allowance

    Individual pay as you go

    Provider API cost pass-through with 0% markup; $5 minimum credit purchase

      Team / non-enterprise workspace

      Provider API cost pass-through with 0% markup; $5 minimum credit purchase

        Enterprise

        150% of individual/team usage cost; $1,000 one-time purchase required to start

          See Full Pricing →Free vs Paid →Is it worth it? →

          Ready to get started with Amp?

          View Pricing Options →

          Best Use Cases

          🎯

          A senior engineer starts an Amp agent from the terminal to investigate a messy feature branch, then continues monitoring the run from web or mobile while away from the workstation.

          ⚡

          A platform team uses Amp plugins to standardize workspace policy, add approved tools, and keep agent behavior consistent across a group of developers instead of relying on personal prompt conventions.

          🔧

          A developer working on long-horizon refactors uses deep or rush modes where Amp claims 87% faster first-token arrival, 32% faster full responses at p50, and up to 40% end-to-end speedups for longer tasks.

          🚀

          A team that allows remote agent control uses passkey-authenticated sudo sessions so web and mobile actions have a stronger approval boundary.

          💡

          An individual developer evaluates frontier coding agents without a fixed subscription by using Amp's free start and pass-through individual pricing with zero markup.

          🔄

          A CLI-heavy engineering organization adopts Amp when terminal-first workflows matter more than a purely editor-native coding assistant experience.

          Limitations & What It Can't Do

          We believe in transparent reviews. Here's what Amp doesn't handle well:

          • ⚠Published pricing is usage-based rather than a flat subscription: individuals and non-enterprise workspaces pay pass-through provider API costs with zero markup and a $5 minimum credit purchase, while Enterprise usage is 50% more expensive and starts with a one-time $1,000 USD purchase that becomes Enterprise usage credit.
          • ⚠Amp's value depends on developers being comfortable with CLI, TUI, plugin, and agent-based workflows rather than simple editor autocomplete.
          • ⚠Usage costs may vary significantly by model choice, task length, and how often developers run deep or rush sessions.
          • ⚠The product appears optimized for active frontier-model workflows, so organizations with strict model approval processes may need extra review before adoption.
          • ⚠Public website claims focus on product capabilities and speed improvements, but the visible content does not include independent benchmarks, customer counts, SOC 2 status, or uptime SLA details.

          Pros & Cons

          ✓ Pros

          • ✓Amp supports CLI-first agent workflows and can be installed on Mac, Linux, WSL, Windows, or through Homebrew, which fits developers who live in terminal-based workflows.
          • ✓The June 4, 2026 "Agents, Everywhere" release adds continuity across web, CLI, and mobile so developers can watch and drive agents from more than one surface.
          • ✓Performance claims are specific: Amp says deep and rush modes now receive the first token 87% faster, entire responses are 32% faster at p50, and long-horizon tasks can reach up to a 40% end-to-end speedup.
          • ✓Plugin extensibility is deeper than simple settings: plugins can hook into events, add tools, standardize policy, and be deployed to a workspace.
          • ✓The public pricing message is unusually direct for this category: individuals and non-enterprise workspaces pay pass-through provider API costs with zero markup, no subscription or commitment, and a $5 minimum credit purchase.
          • ✓Team controls include passkey-authenticated "sudo" sessions for web and mobile remote control, which is useful when organizations need stronger governance around agent actions.

          ✗ Cons

          • ✗Amp does not publish a simple fixed monthly or annual seat price, so teams must estimate usage from provider API costs and Amp credit consumption rather than a flat subscription.
          • ✗Usage-based pricing can be harder to forecast than a flat per-seat subscription, especially for developers running long deep or rush sessions.
          • ✗Amp is aimed at professional developers and software teams; nontechnical users will get little value from its CLI, TUI, plugin, and workspace concepts.
          • ✗The product messaging emphasizes moving quickly with frontier models, which may be uncomfortable for teams that prefer slow-changing, highly standardized tooling.
          • ✗Because Amp is newer and more agent-focused than mainstream editor assistants, teams may need to validate its behavior, permissions, and cost controls before replacing incumbent tools.

          Frequently Asked Questions

          What is Amp used for?+

          Amp is used to run AI coding agents that can work on software tasks from the terminal and continue across web and mobile surfaces. The website describes it as a frontier coding agent rather than a basic autocomplete assistant, so it is best suited for multi-step development work such as editing an existing codebase, managing a long thread, or letting an agent investigate and change code. Its plugin system also makes it relevant for teams that want to standardize policy and tooling across a workspace.

          How much does Amp cost?+

          Amp charges for actual LLM and certain tool usage. Individuals and non-enterprise workspaces pay pass-through provider API costs with zero markup, no subscription, no commitment, and a $5 minimum credit purchase. Amp's pricing page gives an example where $2 in Anthropic API usage plus $0.50 in OpenAI API usage deducts $2.50 from credits. Enterprise usage is 50% more expensive than individual and team plans and requires a one-time $1,000 USD purchase that grants $1,000 USD of Enterprise usage. Source: https://ampcode.com/manual#pricing

          What changed in Amp in 2026?+

          Amp lists several 2026 product updates on its homepage and Chronicle pages. On June 5, 2026, Amp announced that deep and rush modes receive the first token 87% faster and entire responses 32% faster at p50, with up to a 40% end-to-end speedup on long-horizon tasks. On June 4, 2026, it announced "Agents, Everywhere" for web, CLI, and mobile control. On May 28, 2026, Amp said plugins could show web UI elements. Sources: https://ampcode.com/news/faster-deep-rush, https://ampcode.com/news/agents-everywhere, and https://ampcode.com/news/plugins-everywhere

          Is Amp better for individuals or teams?+

          Amp can work for both, but the public site describes different strengths for each audience. Individuals get zero-markup pass-through usage pricing and can install the CLI on common development environments including Mac, Linux, WSL, Windows, and Homebrew. Teams get more value from workspace-level plugins, policy standardization, durable agent execution, pooled workspace credits, and passkey-authenticated sudo sessions for remote control. Compared to the 870+ AI tools in our directory, Amp is more specialized toward serious engineering workflows than general productivity use.

          How does Amp compare with Cursor, Copilot, Claude Code, and Codex?+

          Amp is closer to Claude Code and Codex than to simple code completion tools because its public positioning centers on long-running agents, CLI use, and durable execution. Cursor and GitHub Copilot are stronger fits when a team wants editor-native assistance and familiar IDE integration, while Amp is more compelling when the desired workflow is to start agents in a terminal and monitor or drive them elsewhere. Amp's plugin architecture and 2026 performance updates are specific strengths, but users who need predictable fixed-seat pricing may prefer competitors with published subscription tiers.
          🦞

          New to AI tools?

          Read practical guides for choosing and using AI tools

          Read Guides →

          Get updates on Amp and 370+ other AI tools

          Weekly insights on the latest AI tools, features, and trends delivered to your inbox.

          No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

          User Reviews

          No reviews yet. Be the first to share your experience!

          Quick Info

          Category

          AI coding assistant

          Website

          ampcode.com
          🔄Compare with alternatives →

          Try Amp Today

          Get started with Amp and see if it's the right fit for your needs.

          Get Started →

          Need help choosing the right AI stack?

          Take our 60-second quiz to get personalized tool recommendations

          Find Your Perfect AI Stack →

          Want a faster launch?

          Explore 20 ready-to-deploy AI agent templates for sales, support, dev, research, and operations.

          Browse Agent Templates →

          More about Amp

          PricingReviewAlternativesFree vs PaidPros & ConsWorth It?Tutorial

          📚 Related Articles

          10 AI Automation Workflows Every Small Business Should Build in 2026

          Stop drowning in repetitive tasks. These 10 AI automation workflows help small businesses save time on email, customer support, invoicing, social media, and more — with practical setup guidance using accessible tools.

          2026-03-1412 min read

          LangGraph Tutorial: Build Stateful Agent Workflows with Python

          Learn LangGraph from scratch. Build stateful AI agent workflows with cycles, branching, persistence, human-in-the-loop, and multi-agent coordination — with real Python code examples.

          2026-03-1116 min read

          Cursor vs GitHub Copilot 2026: Which AI Coding Assistant Wins for Productivity?

          Two years ago, picking an AI coding assistant meant choosing between a handful of autocomplete plugins. In 2026, the **cursor vs github copilot** decision affects how your entire team writes, reviews, and ships code. Both tools have added agentic capabilities, background task run

          2026-04-15T03:12:31Z5 min read

          Best AI Coding Assistants 2026: GitHub Copilot vs Cursor vs Claude Compared

          2026-04-08T04:20:58Z5 min read