Loading tool details…
Compare listed plans and check current offer terms with AgentEval
The catalog lists this free option; confirm its current limits and eligibility with AgentEval
💡 Pro tip: Start with the free tier to test if AgentEval fits your workflow before upgrading to a paid plan.
per month
This guide does not establish that AgentEval has an active coupon, education discount, or seasonal promotion. Confirm current offers on the vendor's website before paying.
If AgentEval's pricing doesn't fit your budget, consider these voice agents alternatives:
DeepEval is the open-source, Pytest-style LLM evaluation framework from Confident AI. Ship it in your test suite the same way you ship pytest — it runs 50+ research-backed metrics (hallucination, tool-use correctness, contextual precision/recall, conversational quality) offline in dev and inline in CI/CD, then optionally streams the results to Confident AI's paid cloud for team dashboards and prompt versioning.
Free tier available
✓ Free plan available
LangSmith helps developers trace, evaluate, test, and monitor applications built with language models and agent workflows.
Free tier available
Open-source CLI and library for testing, evaluating, and red-teaming LLM prompts, models, and RAG pipelines — runs locally on your machine or in CI.
Free tier available
No. AgentEval is built exclusively for .NET and ships on NuGet (nuget.org/packages/AgentEval). Python teams should use DeepEval, PromptFoo, or LangSmith for equivalent AI agent evaluation capabilities. Based on our analysis of 870+ AI tools, AgentEval is one of the only mature agent evaluation frameworks targeting the Microsoft/.NET ecosystem specifically, which is precisely its positioning.
Yes. Any .NET agent that implements IChatClient can be tested via the IChatClient.AsEvaluableAgent() one-liner extension method. A Semantic Kernel bridge is also included for SK-based agents. This cross-framework design means you are not locked into MAF, though MAF is where the deepest integration exists with automatic tool call tracking and token/cost telemetry.
DeepEval and RAGAS are Python frameworks with larger communities and broader metric catalogs. AgentEval is their .NET counterpart, offering equivalent coverage for RAG metrics (Faithfulness, Relevance, Context Precision/Recall), plus unique additions like the 192-probe Red Team module and fluent tool-chain assertions. Choose based on language ecosystem — AgentEval for C#/.NET shops, DeepEval/RAGAS for Python. All three are open source.
It scales with repetition count: 100 tests × 50 repetitions equals 5,000 LLM calls, roughly $15–$30 per test suite at GPT-4 pricing. AgentEval's recommended pattern is to use live stochastic evaluation only for new scenarios and switch to trace record/replay for regression testing in CI, which eliminates API costs entirely. The comparer's RunsPerModel option (typically 5) gives statistical stability without runaway cost.
The Red Team module runs 192 attack probes across 9 attack types: Prompt Injection, Jailbreaks, PII Leakage, System Prompt Extraction, Indirect Injection, Excessive Agency, Insecure Output Handling, API Abuse, and Encoding Evasion. This covers 6 of the OWASP LLM Top 10 2025 vulnerabilities (60% coverage) with MITRE ATLAS technique mapping, and results can be exported directly to PDF for compliance reporting via result.ExportAsync("security-report.pdf", ExportFormat.Pdf).
Start with the free tier and upgrade when you need more features
Get Started with AgentEval →Listed prices may change. Confirm current prices and offer terms with the vendor.