Workato ONE vs Make.com

Detailed side-by-side comparison to help you choose the right tool

Workato ONE

Integrations

Workato ONE is an enterprise automation and orchestration platform for agentic AI, integrations, APIs, data workflows, and business process automation. It includes capabilities such as MCP Gateway, AI workflows, Agent Studio, enterprise search, and embedded iPaaS.

Was this helpful?

Starting Price

Custom

Make.com

🟒No Code

Automation & Workflows

Make.com: Visual automation platform with AI integration and workflow orchestration

Was this helpful?

Starting Price

Free

Feature Comparison

Scroll horizontally to compare details.

FeatureWorkato ONEMake.com
CategoryIntegrationsAutomation & Workflows
Pricing Plans10 tiers4 tiers
Starting PriceFree
Key Features
  • β€’ Enterprise MCP and MCP Gateway for governed agent access
  • β€’ Modern iPaaS for app and workflow integrations
  • β€’ Agent Studio and Agent Orchestration for building enterprise AI agents
  • β€’ Workflow Runtime
  • β€’ Tool and API Connectivity
  • β€’ State and Context Handling

πŸ’‘ Our Take

Choose Workato ONE for enterprise automation programs involving IT, HR, finance, sales, support, agentic AI, and governed system access. Choose Make if your team wants a more visual automation builder for lower-complexity workflows and does not need Enterprise MCP, embedded iPaaS, MDM, EDI, or enterprise-grade orchestration.

Workato ONE - Pros & Cons

Pros

  • βœ“Combines integration, automation, API management, data orchestration, MCP, and agentic AI capabilities in one enterprise platform instead of treating AI agents as a separate add-on.
  • βœ“The website specifically lists Enterprise MCP, MCP Gateway, Agent Studio, Agent Orchestration, Enterprise Search, and Otto by Workato, making it more AI-agent focused than many traditional iPaaS products.
  • βœ“Strong departmental breadth: Workato lists solutions for IT, Finance, Support, HR, Marketing, Sales, Revenue Operations, and Product teams, which supports cross-functional automation programs.
  • βœ“Supports both internal enterprise automation and embedded iPaaS for SaaS companies that want to offer integrations inside their own products.
  • βœ“Workato states it is recognized in the 2026 Gartner Magic Quadrant for Integration Platform as a Service and describes itself as β€œ8x a Leader” and β€œ3x Furthest in Vision.”
  • βœ“Founded in December 2013, Workato has a longer operating history than many newer AI-agent orchestration vendors.

Cons

  • βœ—No public monthly or annual pricing is visible in the provided website content, so buyers must contact sales to understand budget fit.
  • βœ—The platform breadth can be more than smaller teams need if they only want simple app-to-app automations or a few personal productivity workflows.
  • βœ—Enterprise MCP, API management, embedded iPaaS, MDM, EDI, RPA, and agent orchestration imply a more involved implementation than lightweight no-code automation tools.
  • βœ—The provided website content does not disclose exact connector counts, usage limits, seat pricing, or plan differences, making direct vendor comparison harder during early evaluation.
  • βœ—Organizations that do not need agentic AI governance or enterprise integration controls may find the platform heavier than simpler tools such as Zapier or Make.

Make.com - Pros & Cons

Pros

  • βœ“Visual scenario builder supports routers, filters, scheduled runs, subscenarios, real-time execution monitoring, and reusable scenario templates.
  • βœ“Large connector ecosystem with 3,000+ standard apps, 350+ AI apps, and 300+ Make API endpoints for custom automation work.
  • βœ“Free plan includes 1,000 credits/month, 2 active scenarios, 3,000+ apps, routers and filters, and customer support with no time limit.
  • βœ“Paid plans support unlimited active scenarios, 1-minute scheduling, higher data transfer limits, and access to the Make API starting at $12/month for 10,000 credits.
  • βœ“Enterprise options include SSO, domain claim, on-prem agents for local systems such as SAP, advanced security features, 24/7 Enterprise support, and overage protection.
  • βœ“Make is used by 400,000+ customers across 200+ countries and territories, backed by a team of 350+ employees and parent company Celonis.

Cons

  • βœ—Credit-based billing can become hard to forecast because each module action in a scenario consumes credits.
  • βœ—The Free plan is limited to 1,000 credits/month, 2 active scenarios, 15-minute minimum scheduling, 5-minute maximum execution time, and 5 MB file processing.
  • βœ—Native AI features are useful for orchestration, but Make is not a full model development, vector database, or dedicated RAG platform.
  • βœ—Advanced governance and security features such as SSO, domain claim, audit logs, 24/7 support, and on-prem agents are Enterprise-oriented.
  • βœ—Complex scenarios still require careful technical design, especially when handling retries, data transformation, API limits, and high-volume AI calls.

Not sure which to pick?

🎯 Take our quiz β†’

πŸ”’ Security & Compliance Comparison

Scroll horizontally to compare details.

Security FeatureWorkato ONEMake.com
SOC2β€”βœ… Yes
GDPRβ€”βœ… Yes
HIPAAβ€”βŒ No
SSOβ€”βœ… Yes
Self-Hostedβ€”βŒ No
On-Premβ€”βœ… Yes
RBACβ€”βœ… Yes
Audit Logβ€”βœ… Yes
Open Sourceβ€”βŒ No
API Key Authβ€”βœ… Yes
Encryption at Restβ€”βœ… Yes
Encryption in Transitβ€”βœ… Yes
Data Residencyβ€”US, EU
Data Retentionβ€”plan-dependent
🦞

New to AI tools?

Read practical guides for choosing and using AI tools

πŸ””

Price Drop Alerts

Get notified when AI tools lower their prices

Tracking 2 tools

We only email when prices actually change. No spam, ever.

Get weekly AI agent tool insights

Comparisons, new tool launches, and expert recommendations delivered to your inbox.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Ready to Choose?

Read the full reviews to make an informed decision