Stably Orca vs Baton

Detailed side-by-side comparison to help you choose the right tool

Stably Orca

🔴Developer

developer-tools

Desktop AI orchestrator by Stably that runs multiple coding agents side-by-side, each in its own isolated git worktree, tracked in one place.

Was this helpful?

Starting Price

Custom

Baton

🔴Developer

developer-tools

A macOS menu bar app that tracks every Claude Code and Codex session on your machine and tells you which AI coding agent is waiting on you right now.

Was this helpful?

Starting Price

Custom

Feature Comparison

Scroll horizontally to compare details.

FeatureStably OrcaBaton
Categorydeveloper-toolsdeveloper-tools
Pricing Plans6 tiers6 tiers
Starting Price
Key Features

      Stably Orca - Pros & Cons

      Pros

      • Wraps any CLI agent — vendor-neutral so it stays useful as the coding-agent market churns
      • Isolated git worktrees per agent make parallel experimentation genuinely safe
      • Design Mode collapses the screenshot-plus-CSS-plus-prompt loop into a single click
      • SSH remote worktrees let expensive agent runs live on beefier hardware
      • Mobile companion means you can monitor and steer agents without being at the desk

      Cons

      • Desktop-only — no browser or hosted control plane if your primary workstation is locked down
      • No MCP support currently — integration is CLI and Orca-CLI-based
      • Running multiple frontier agents in parallel multiplies your token bill quickly
      • Design Mode requires the Chromium browser inside Orca; it does not observe external browsers
      • Newer entrant — configuration and workflow patterns are still solidifying compared to established IDEs

      Baton - Pros & Cons

      Pros

      • Free, open source (MIT), no telemetry, nothing leaves the machine
      • Sub-second updates via FSEvents; negligible CPU/battery cost
      • Handles both Claude Code and Codex in one unified view
      • Click-to-jump saves the biggest actual cost of multi-agent work: finding the right window
      • One-line install with an isolated venv — clean uninstall too

      Cons

      • macOS only; no Linux or Windows menu bar equivalent
      • Requires Python 3.9+ on the host (3.11+ for Codex automation tracking)
      • Only tracks Claude Code and Codex — other coding agents (Cursor, Cline, Aider) not supported
      • No push notifications to phone / other devices; menu bar only
      • Read-only by design — cannot send input back to sessions

      Not sure which to pick?

      🎯 Take our quiz →
      🦞

      New to AI tools?

      Read practical guides for choosing and using AI tools

      🔔

      Price Drop Alerts

      Get notified when AI tools lower their prices

      Tracking 2 tools

      We only email when prices actually change. No spam, ever.

      Get weekly AI agent tool insights

      Comparisons, new tool launches, and expert recommendations delivered to your inbox.

      No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

      Ready to Choose?

      Read the full reviews to make an informed decision