Smithery vs Windsurf

Detailed side-by-side comparison to help you choose the right tool

Smithery

🔴Developer

MCP infrastructure

Smithery helps teams with discovering and operating MCP integrations; live pricing and feature details require manual verification.

Was this helpful?

Starting Price

Custom

Windsurf

🔴Developer

AI coding assistant

An agentic coding environment for editing, understanding, and generating software.

Was this helpful?

Starting Price

Free

Feature Comparison

Scroll horizontally to compare details.

FeatureSmitheryWindsurf
CategoryMCP infrastructureAI coding assistant
Pricing Plans78 tiers48 tiers
Starting PriceFree
Key Features
  • • Searchable registry of thousands of MCP servers with install counts and reviews
  • • One-line install for Claude Desktop, Cursor, Windsurf, Cline, OpenClaw and VS Code
  • • Hosted streamable HTTP runtime for remote MCP servers
  • • Repository-aware code explanation and generation
  • • Agentic multi-file editing inside a developer IDE
  • • Natural-language implementation and refactoring requests

Smithery - Pros & Cons

Pros

  • ✓The registry reduces time spent finding compatible MCP servers and connection instructions.
  • ✓Managed OAuth removes repeated authorization plumbing when agents access user-owned services.
  • ✓A free allowance of 50,000 monthly RPCs makes small proofs of concept practical.
  • ✓Namespaces and a custom tier provide a path from individual experiments to organized production use.

Cons

  • ✗Smithery becomes another availability and latency dependency between the agent and its tools.
  • ✗Registry presence is not a substitute for reviewing server code, ownership, permissions, and update behavior.
  • ✗RPC-based costs can be difficult to predict when one user task fans out into many tool calls and retries.
  • ✗Custom rate limits, an uptime SLA, and Slack support require a sales conversation.

Windsurf - Pros & Cons

Pros

  • ✓Keeps code generation and repository exploration inside the editor
  • ✓Coordinates changes across multiple files instead of returning isolated snippets
  • ✓MCP client support expands the tools an agent can use
  • ✓Strong fit for feature work, refactoring, and unfamiliar repositories

Cons

  • ✗Homepage and pricing page returned HTTP 429, so current prices need manual verification
  • ✗Large generated diffs can increase review burden and hide regressions
  • ✗MCP servers expand the permission and security surface
  • ✗Generated code still requires tests, security review, and human approval

Not sure which to pick?

🎯 Take our quiz →

🔒 Security & Compliance Comparison

Scroll horizontally to compare details.

Security FeatureSmitheryWindsurf
SOC2—✅ Yes
GDPR—✅ Yes
HIPAA——
SSO—✅ Yes
Self-Hosted—✅ Yes
On-Prem—✅ Yes
RBAC—✅ Yes
Audit Log—✅ Yes
Open Source—❌ No
API Key Auth—✅ Yes
Encryption at Rest—✅ Yes
Encryption in Transit—✅ Yes
Data Residency—US, EU
Data Retention—configurable
🦞

New to AI tools?

Read practical guides for choosing and using AI tools

🔔

Price Drop Alerts

Get notified when AI tools lower their prices

Tracking 2 tools

We only email when prices actually change. No spam, ever.

Get weekly AI agent tool insights

Comparisons, new tool launches, and expert recommendations delivered to your inbox.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Ready to Choose?

Read the full reviews to make an informed decision