Shilo vs Adept

Detailed side-by-side comparison to help you choose the right tool

Shilo

Business AI Solutions

AI assistant built for real estate teams that listens, coaches, and guides agents in real time to help them close deals with confidence.

Was this helpful?

Starting Price

Custom

Adept

πŸ”΄Developer

Business AI Solutions

Adept AI licenses its ACT-1 Action Transformer technology to enterprise partners, enabling them to build AI agents that visually control any computer software using natural language commands. Through its partnership model, Adept provides screen-reading AI models, proprietary training datasets, and technical consultation for building custom agentic automation solutionsβ€”offering an alternative to traditional RPA platforms for organizations with complex, multi-application workflows.

Was this helpful?

Starting Price

Contact Sales

Feature Comparison

Scroll horizontally to compare details.

FeatureShiloAdept
CategoryBusiness AI SolutionsBusiness AI Solutions
Pricing Plans4 tiers6 tiers
Starting PriceContact Sales
Key Features
  • β€’ Real-time speech-to-text transcription optimized for real estate terminology
  • β€’ Live coaching cards with objection-handling suggestions during calls
  • β€’ AI-powered deal-stage tracking tied to coaching moments
  • β€’ Visual screen understanding and automation
  • β€’ Natural language workflow execution
  • β€’ Cross-application automation capabilities

Shilo - Pros & Cons

Pros

  • βœ“Specialized focus on live real estate sales conversations rather than trying to be an all-in-one platform, filling a gap that general CRMs leave open
  • βœ“Real-time AI coaching during calls provides agents with contextual suggestions and objection-handling prompts without leaving the conversation
  • βœ“Manager dashboard provides granular visibility into team performance, coaching adherence metrics, and training opportunity identification
  • βœ“Integrates with real estate CRMs and existing telephony stacks rather than requiring agents to switch platforms
  • βœ“AI suggestions improve over time by learning from a team's own successful calls, tailoring to specific markets and property types
  • βœ“Objection library covers over 200 common real estate objections with AI-generated rebuttals tuned to property-specific vocabulary

Cons

  • βœ—Pricing is not publicly listed and requires contacting sales, making quick budget comparisons difficultβ€”refer to comparable platforms like Gong ($100–$150/user/month) for general market context
  • βœ—Relatively new entrant in the market with limited long-term performance data across diverse economic conditions
  • βœ—Vendor-published performance claims have not been independently verified by third-party audits as of early 2026
  • βœ—Focused narrowly on call coaching, so teams still need separate tools for lead generation, marketing automation, and transaction management
  • βœ—Effectiveness may vary significantly across different real estate markets, property types, and buyer demographics, requiring a pilot period to validate

Adept - Pros & Cons

Pros

  • βœ“Works with any desktop or web application without requiring API integrations - ideal for legacy systems and custom enterprise software
  • βœ“Natural language interface makes automation accessible to non-technical business users without requiring Python, JavaScript, or RPA scripting knowledge
  • βœ“Advanced reinforcement learning adaptation handles interface changes and unexpected scenarios, reducing the 30-40% maintenance overhead typical of traditional RPA deployments
  • βœ“Backed by $415M in funding with founding team including Ashish Vaswani (transformer architecture co-inventor) and former Google/OpenAI research leads
  • βœ“ACT-1 model can execute multi-step workflows spanning 10+ applications in a single natural language command, eliminating manual context switching
  • βœ“Enterprise-grade partnership model provides deep customization and dedicated technical consultation unavailable from off-the-shelf RPA vendors

Cons

  • βœ—Partnership-only access model with no self-service signup or public availabilityβ€”requires direct enterprise sales engagement and significant upfront investment
  • βœ—No transparent pricing published; licensing fees, professional services, and ongoing consultation costs are negotiated per partnership
  • βœ—Requires extensive screen access permissions that may conflict with zero-trust security policies and SOC 2/HIPAA compliance frameworks
  • βœ—Following 2024 strategic shift, key talent moved to Amazonβ€”raising questions about long-term product roadmap continuity for partners
  • βœ—Visual-only automation cannot handle command-line interfaces, headless servers, or API-only backend systems common in modern DevOps workflows

Not sure which to pick?

🎯 Take our quiz β†’

πŸ”’ Security & Compliance Comparison

Scroll horizontally to compare details.

Security FeatureShiloAdept
SOC2β€”β€”
GDPRβ€”βœ… Yes
HIPAAβ€”β€”
SSOβ€”β€”
Self-Hostedβ€”βŒ No
On-Premβ€”βŒ No
RBACβ€”βœ… Yes
Audit Logβ€”βœ… Yes
Open Sourceβ€”βŒ No
API Key Authβ€”βœ… Yes
Encryption at Restβ€”βœ… Yes
Encryption in Transitβ€”βœ… Yes
Data Residencyβ€”Configurable
Data Retentionβ€”Configurable
🦞

New to AI tools?

Read practical guides for choosing and using AI tools

πŸ””

Price Drop Alerts

Get notified when AI tools lower their prices

Tracking 2 tools

We only email when prices actually change. No spam, ever.

Get weekly AI agent tool insights

Comparisons, new tool launches, and expert recommendations delivered to your inbox.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Ready to Choose?

Read the full reviews to make an informed decision