Power Automate vs Make.com

Detailed side-by-side comparison to help you choose the right tool

Power Automate

Automation & Workflows

Microsoft's workflow automation platform that integrates AI Builder capabilities for intelligent automation including form processing, text analysis, and prediction models.

Was this helpful?

Starting Price

Custom

Make.com

🟒No Code

Automation & Workflows

Make.com: Visual automation platform with AI integration and workflow orchestration

Was this helpful?

Starting Price

Free

Feature Comparison

Scroll horizontally to compare details.

FeaturePower AutomateMake.com
CategoryAutomation & WorkflowsAutomation & Workflows
Pricing Plans8 tiers4 tiers
Starting PriceFree
Key Features
  • β€’ AI Builder prebuilt and custom models
  • β€’ 1,000+ connectors to cloud and on-premises systems
  • β€’ Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with Power Automate Desktop
  • β€’ Workflow Runtime
  • β€’ Tool and API Connectivity
  • β€’ State and Context Handling

πŸ’‘ Our Take

Choose Power Automate for enterprise-scale automation with RPA, on-premises connectivity, and native AI Builder capabilities. Choose Make (formerly Integromat) if you want a visually richer scenario builder, lower per-operation pricing, and more flexibility for data transformations in SaaS-heavy stacks without Microsoft dependencies.

Power Automate - Pros & Cons

Pros

  • βœ“Native integration with Microsoft 365, Dynamics 365, Azure, and Teams makes it the default choice for Microsoft-shop enterprises
  • βœ“AI Builder ships prebuilt models (invoice, receipt, business card, ID reader) that work without ML expertise and deploy in minutes
  • βœ“Power Automate Desktop is included free with Windows 11 Pro, lowering the barrier to RPA adoption
  • βœ“Over 1,000 prebuilt connectors reduce custom-integration work compared to most competitors in our directory
  • βœ“Copilot lets users describe a flow in plain English and generates the working automation, cutting build time significantly
  • βœ“Enterprise-grade governance including environments, DLP policies, audit trails, and role-based access control

Cons

  • βœ—AI Builder consumes credits separately (starting at $500/month for 1M credits) on top of base licensing, which can escalate costs quickly at scale
  • βœ—Premium connectors (SQL, Salesforce, HTTP) require a $15/user/month planβ€”free tier is limited to standard Microsoft connectors
  • βœ—Steeper learning curve than lightweight tools like Zapier; terms like environments, Dataverse, and solutions take time to master
  • βœ—Performance can be sluggish compared to code-based alternatives, especially for flows with many loops or large datasets
  • βœ—Licensing model (per-user vs per-flow, with AI Builder add-ons) is notoriously confusing for procurement teams

Make.com - Pros & Cons

Pros

  • βœ“Visual scenario builder supports routers, filters, scheduled runs, subscenarios, real-time execution monitoring, and reusable scenario templates.
  • βœ“Large connector ecosystem with 3,000+ standard apps, 350+ AI apps, and 300+ Make API endpoints for custom automation work.
  • βœ“Free plan includes 1,000 credits/month, 2 active scenarios, 3,000+ apps, routers and filters, and customer support with no time limit.
  • βœ“Paid plans support unlimited active scenarios, 1-minute scheduling, higher data transfer limits, and access to the Make API starting at $12/month for 10,000 credits.
  • βœ“Enterprise options include SSO, domain claim, on-prem agents for local systems such as SAP, advanced security features, 24/7 Enterprise support, and overage protection.
  • βœ“Make is used by 400,000+ customers across 200+ countries and territories, backed by a team of 350+ employees and parent company Celonis.

Cons

  • βœ—Credit-based billing can become hard to forecast because each module action in a scenario consumes credits.
  • βœ—The Free plan is limited to 1,000 credits/month, 2 active scenarios, 15-minute minimum scheduling, 5-minute maximum execution time, and 5 MB file processing.
  • βœ—Native AI features are useful for orchestration, but Make is not a full model development, vector database, or dedicated RAG platform.
  • βœ—Advanced governance and security features such as SSO, domain claim, audit logs, 24/7 support, and on-prem agents are Enterprise-oriented.
  • βœ—Complex scenarios still require careful technical design, especially when handling retries, data transformation, API limits, and high-volume AI calls.

Not sure which to pick?

🎯 Take our quiz β†’

πŸ”’ Security & Compliance Comparison

Scroll horizontally to compare details.

Security FeaturePower AutomateMake.com
SOC2β€”βœ… Yes
GDPRβ€”βœ… Yes
HIPAAβ€”βŒ No
SSOβ€”βœ… Yes
Self-Hostedβ€”βŒ No
On-Premβ€”βœ… Yes
RBACβ€”βœ… Yes
Audit Logβ€”βœ… Yes
Open Sourceβ€”βŒ No
API Key Authβ€”βœ… Yes
Encryption at Restβ€”βœ… Yes
Encryption in Transitβ€”βœ… Yes
Data Residencyβ€”US, EU
Data Retentionβ€”plan-dependent
🦞

New to AI tools?

Read practical guides for choosing and using AI tools

πŸ””

Price Drop Alerts

Get notified when AI tools lower their prices

Tracking 2 tools

We only email when prices actually change. No spam, ever.

Get weekly AI agent tool insights

Comparisons, new tool launches, and expert recommendations delivered to your inbox.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Ready to Choose?

Read the full reviews to make an informed decision