n8n vs Make.com

Detailed side-by-side comparison to help you choose the right tool

n8n

🟡Low Code

Workflow automation

A flexible workflow automation platform for technical teams, including AI agents, integrations, code, and self-hosting.

Was this helpful?

Starting Price

Free
Full ReviewVisit Site

Make.com

🟢No Code

Automation & Workflows

Make.com: Visual automation platform with AI integration and workflow orchestration

Was this helpful?

Starting Price

Free
Full ReviewVisit Site

Feature Comparison

Scroll horizontally to compare details.

Featuren8nMake.com
CategoryWorkflow automationAutomation & Workflows
Pricing Plans200 tiers4 tiers
Starting PriceFreeFree
Key Features
  • • Visual AI-agent canvas with traceable steps
  • • 500+ integrations and 10,000 workflow templates
  • • JavaScript, Python, HTTP, webhook, API, and CLI escape hatches
  • • Workflow Runtime
  • • Tool and API Connectivity
  • • State and Context Handling

n8n - Pros & Cons

Pros

  • ✓Starter is €20/month annually for 2,500 executions
  • ✓Charges by execution instead of each step
  • ✓Self-hosting provides infrastructure and data control
  • ✓Code, Git, and environments suit technical teams

Cons

  • ✗Self-hosting transfers security and availability work to customers
  • ✗Business jumps to €667/month billed annually
  • ✗Retries and frequent triggers consume allowances
  • ✗Flexibility requires testing, idempotency, and monitoring

Make.com - Pros & Cons

Pros

  • ✓Visual scenario builder supports routers, filters, scheduled runs, subscenarios, real-time execution monitoring, and reusable scenario templates.
  • ✓Large connector ecosystem with 3,000+ standard apps, 350+ AI apps, and 300+ Make API endpoints for custom automation work.
  • ✓Free plan includes 1,000 credits/month, 2 active scenarios, 3,000+ apps, routers and filters, and customer support with no time limit.
  • ✓Paid plans support unlimited active scenarios, 1-minute scheduling, higher data transfer limits, and access to the Make API starting at $12/month for 10,000 credits.
  • ✓Enterprise options include SSO, domain claim, on-prem agents for local systems such as SAP, advanced security features, 24/7 Enterprise support, and overage protection.
  • ✓Make is used by 400,000+ customers across 200+ countries and territories, backed by a team of 350+ employees and parent company Celonis.

Cons

  • ✗Credit-based billing can become hard to forecast because each module action in a scenario consumes credits.
  • ✗The Free plan is limited to 1,000 credits/month, 2 active scenarios, 15-minute minimum scheduling, 5-minute maximum execution time, and 5 MB file processing.
  • ✗Native AI features are useful for orchestration, but Make is not a full model development, vector database, or dedicated RAG platform.
  • ✗Advanced governance and security features such as SSO, domain claim, audit logs, 24/7 support, and on-prem agents are Enterprise-oriented.
  • ✗Complex scenarios still require careful technical design, especially when handling retries, data transformation, API limits, and high-volume AI calls.

Not sure which to pick?

🎯 Take our quiz →

🔒 Security & Compliance Comparison

Scroll horizontally to compare details.

Security Featuren8nMake.com
SOC2—✅ Yes
GDPR—✅ Yes
HIPAA—❌ No
SSO✅ Yes✅ Yes
Self-Hosted🔀 Hybrid❌ No
On-Prem✅ Yes✅ Yes
RBAC✅ Yes✅ Yes
Audit Log✅ Yes✅ Yes
Open Source❌ No❌ No
API Key Auth✅ Yes✅ Yes
Encryption at Rest✅ Yes✅ Yes
Encryption in Transit✅ Yes✅ Yes
Data ResidencyEUUS, EU
Data Retentionconfigurableplan-dependent
🦞

New to AI tools?

Read practical guides for choosing and using AI tools

Read Guides →
🔔

Price Drop Alerts

Get notified when AI tools lower their prices

Tracking 2 tools

We only email when prices actually change. No spam, ever.

Get weekly AI agent tool insights

Comparisons, new tool launches, and expert recommendations delivered to your inbox.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Ready to Choose?

Read the full reviews to make an informed decision

Review n8nReview Make.com