n8n vs Make.com
Detailed side-by-side comparison to help you choose the right tool
n8n
🟡Low CodeAI Automation
Source-available workflow automation platform with native AI agent and LangChain nodes, popular for self-hosted AI workflows.
Was this helpful?
Starting Price
FreeMake.com
🟢No CodeAutomation & Workflows
Make.com: Visual automation platform with AI integration and workflow orchestration
Was this helpful?
Starting Price
FreeFeature Comparison
Scroll horizontally to compare details.
n8n - Pros & Cons
Pros
- ✓Self-hosted Community edition is free and runs anywhere — no per-task pricing tax
- ✓Native AI Agent node and LangChain blocks let you build real agents on a visual canvas
- ✓MCP Client node integrates n8n into the emerging MCP agent ecosystem
- ✓JavaScript code nodes provide escape hatches for anything the visual editor cannot express
Cons
- ✗Visual editor becomes noisy on workflows with dozens of branches and tool calls
- ✗Debugging long-running agent loops is still painful versus a real code IDE
- ✗Cloud tier execution caps can surprise heavy users — self-hosting is the practical path at scale
- ✗Sustainable Use License is fair-code, not OSI-approved open source, which some procurement teams flag
Make.com - Pros & Cons
Pros
- ✓Visual scenario builder supports routers, filters, scheduled runs, subscenarios, real-time execution monitoring, and reusable scenario templates.
- ✓Large connector ecosystem with 3,000+ standard apps, 350+ AI apps, and 300+ Make API endpoints for custom automation work.
- ✓Free plan includes 1,000 credits/month, 2 active scenarios, 3,000+ apps, routers and filters, and customer support with no time limit.
- ✓Paid plans support unlimited active scenarios, 1-minute scheduling, higher data transfer limits, and access to the Make API starting at $12/month for 10,000 credits.
- ✓Enterprise options include SSO, domain claim, on-prem agents for local systems such as SAP, advanced security features, 24/7 Enterprise support, and overage protection.
- ✓Make is used by 400,000+ customers across 200+ countries and territories, backed by a team of 350+ employees and parent company Celonis.
Cons
- ✗Credit-based billing can become hard to forecast because each module action in a scenario consumes credits.
- ✗The Free plan is limited to 1,000 credits/month, 2 active scenarios, 15-minute minimum scheduling, 5-minute maximum execution time, and 5 MB file processing.
- ✗Native AI features are useful for orchestration, but Make is not a full model development, vector database, or dedicated RAG platform.
- ✗Advanced governance and security features such as SSO, domain claim, audit logs, 24/7 support, and on-prem agents are Enterprise-oriented.
- ✗Complex scenarios still require careful technical design, especially when handling retries, data transformation, API limits, and high-volume AI calls.
Not sure which to pick?
🎯 Take our quiz →🔒 Security & Compliance Comparison
Scroll horizontally to compare details.
🦞
🔔
Price Drop Alerts
Get notified when AI tools lower their prices
Get weekly AI agent tool insights
Comparisons, new tool launches, and expert recommendations delivered to your inbox.