n8n vs Make.com
Detailed side-by-side comparison to help you choose the right tool
n8n
🟡Low CodeAI Automation
Source-available workflow automation for technical teams building AI agents, integrations, and self-hosted business processes.
Was this helpful?
Starting Price
FreeMake.com
🟢No CodeAutomation & Workflows
Make.com: Visual automation platform with AI integration and workflow orchestration
Was this helpful?
Starting Price
FreeFeature Comparison
Scroll horizontally to compare details.
n8n - Pros & Cons
Pros
- ✓Supports complex workflow logic rather than only simple trigger-action automations.
- ✓Includes a large template library, which helps teams start from existing automation patterns.
- ✓Designed for moving and transforming data across many business systems.
- ✓Offers native AI workflow capabilities for agents, RAG-style workflows, and model orchestration.
- ✓Provides both hosted cloud plans and self-hosted deployment paths.
- ✓Paid plans include unlimited users and workflows, with pricing based primarily on executions.
Cons
- ✗Cloud pricing is execution-based, so high-volume workflows need usage planning.
- ✗The platform is likely more complex than simple no-code automation tools for nontechnical users.
- ✗Self-hosting can be an advantage, but it shifts operational responsibility to the customer.
- ✗AI Workflow Builder credits vary by plan and may affect AI workflow experimentation.
- ✗Enterprise governance is called out, but buyers should verify exact compliance requirements during procurement.
Make.com - Pros & Cons
Pros
- ✓Visual scenario builder supports routers, filters, scheduled runs, subscenarios, real-time execution monitoring, and reusable scenario templates.
- ✓Large connector ecosystem with 3,000+ standard apps, 350+ AI apps, and 300+ Make API endpoints for custom automation work.
- ✓Free plan includes 1,000 credits/month, 2 active scenarios, 3,000+ apps, routers and filters, and customer support with no time limit.
- ✓Paid plans support unlimited active scenarios, 1-minute scheduling, higher data transfer limits, and access to the Make API starting at $12/month for 10,000 credits.
- ✓Enterprise options include SSO, domain claim, on-prem agents for local systems such as SAP, advanced security features, 24/7 Enterprise support, and overage protection.
- ✓Make is used by 400,000+ customers across 200+ countries and territories, backed by a team of 350+ employees and parent company Celonis.
Cons
- ✗Credit-based billing can become hard to forecast because each module action in a scenario consumes credits.
- ✗The Free plan is limited to 1,000 credits/month, 2 active scenarios, 15-minute minimum scheduling, 5-minute maximum execution time, and 5 MB file processing.
- ✗Native AI features are useful for orchestration, but Make is not a full model development, vector database, or dedicated RAG platform.
- ✗Advanced governance and security features such as SSO, domain claim, audit logs, 24/7 support, and on-prem agents are Enterprise-oriented.
- ✗Complex scenarios still require careful technical design, especially when handling retries, data transformation, API limits, and high-volume AI calls.
Not sure which to pick?
🎯 Take our quiz →🔒 Security & Compliance Comparison
Scroll horizontally to compare details.
🦞
🔔
Price Drop Alerts
Get notified when AI tools lower their prices
Get weekly AI agent tool insights
Comparisons, new tool launches, and expert recommendations delivered to your inbox.