Make.com vs UiPath

Detailed side-by-side comparison to help you choose the right tool

Make.com

🟢No Code

Automation & Workflows

Make.com: Visual automation platform with AI integration and workflow orchestration

Was this helpful?

Starting Price

Free

UiPath

Business AI Solutions

Enterprise automation platform that drives AI transformation with agentic automation, combining UiPath agents, third-party agents, and API workflows.

Was this helpful?

Starting Price

$0 (Free tier); Pro from ~$420/month

Feature Comparison

Scroll horizontally to compare details.

FeatureMake.comUiPath
CategoryAutomation & WorkflowsBusiness AI Solutions
Pricing Plans4 tiers4 tiers
Starting PriceFree$0 (Free tier); Pro from ~$420/month
Key Features
  • Workflow Runtime
  • Tool and API Connectivity
  • State and Context Handling
  • Agentic automation
  • AI agent integration
  • RPA capabilities

Make.com - Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Visual workflow builder
  • 3,000+ app integrations
  • Make AI integration
  • Make Grid orchestration

Cons

  • Learning curve
  • Pricing consideration
  • Technical requirements

UiPath - Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Industry-leading RPA platform with the largest marketplace of pre-built automations and integrations, reducing development time significantly
  • Agentic automation framework enables orchestrating AI agents from UiPath and third parties (OpenAI, Google, etc.) alongside traditional RPA bots in unified workflows
  • Low-code Studio and StudioX designers allow both professional developers and citizen developers to build automations without deep programming expertise
  • Comprehensive process mining and task mining tools that automatically discover and prioritize automation opportunities from system logs and user activity
  • Enterprise-grade governance with centralized Orchestrator providing role-based access control, audit trails, credential vaults, and compliance reporting across robot fleets
  • Extensive document understanding (intelligent document processing) capabilities that use AI models to extract structured data from invoices, contracts, and forms

Cons

  • Enterprise licensing costs are substantial and opaque — pricing is not publicly listed and requires sales engagement, making budget planning difficult for smaller organizations
  • Initial implementation and deployment is complex, often requiring dedicated UiPath consultants or certified partners, adding to total cost of ownership
  • Steep learning curve for advanced features like AI Center, process mining, and custom ML model integration despite the low-code interface for basic automations
  • Heavy reliance on UI-based automation means bots can break when target application interfaces change, requiring ongoing maintenance
  • The full platform can be overwhelming for teams that only need simple task automation — the breadth of products creates significant feature sprawl

Not sure which to pick?

🎯 Take our quiz →

🔒 Security & Compliance Comparison

Scroll horizontally to compare details.

Security FeatureMake.comUiPath
SOC2✅ Yes✅ Yes
GDPR✅ Yes✅ Yes
HIPAA✅ Yes✅ Yes
SSO✅ Yes✅ Yes
Self-Hosted❌ No
On-Prem❌ No
RBAC✅ Yes✅ Yes
Audit Log✅ Yes
Open Source❌ No
API Key Auth✅ Yes
Encryption at Rest✅ Yes
Encryption in Transit✅ Yes
Data ResidencyUS, EU
Data Retentionconfigurable
🦞

New to AI tools?

Read practical guides for choosing and using AI tools

🔔

Price Drop Alerts

Get notified when AI tools lower their prices

Tracking 2 tools

We only email when prices actually change. No spam, ever.

Get weekly AI agent tool insights

Comparisons, new tool launches, and expert recommendations delivered to your inbox.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Ready to Choose?

Read the full reviews to make an informed decision