Make.com vs Activepieces
Detailed side-by-side comparison to help you choose the right tool
Make.com
🟢No CodeAutomation & Workflows
Make.com: Visual automation platform with AI integration and workflow orchestration
Was this helpful?
Starting Price
FreeActivepieces
Automation & Workflows
Open-source workflow automation platform for app integrations, AI steps, and MCP-ready agents.
Was this helpful?
Starting Price
CustomFeature Comparison
Scroll horizontally to compare details.
💡 Our Take
Choose Activepieces if you want Make-level logic complexity but with predictable flat-rate pricing and built-in enterprise governance (SSO, SCIM, RBAC). Choose Make if you're already invested in its scenario model and prefer a visual canvas optimized for deeply branched data transformations over AI agent workflows.
Make.com - Pros & Cons
Pros
- ✓Visual workflow builder
- ✓3,000+ app integrations
- ✓Make AI integration
- ✓Make Grid orchestration
Cons
- ✗Learning curve
- ✗Pricing consideration
- ✗Technical requirements
Activepieces - Pros & Cons
Pros
- ✓Open-source option is a real differentiator versus closed automation platforms.
- ✓Unlimited-user pricing is attractive for cross-functional teams.
- ✓Combines classic automation, AI steps, and MCP support in one platform.
- ✓Self-hosting helps with compliance and internal control.
Cons
- ✗Connector depth and UX are less mature than Zapier in some areas.
- ✗Advanced workflows may require JavaScript or debugging effort.
- ✗Task-based pricing can get expensive at scale.
- ✗Smaller ecosystem than longer-established automation rivals.
Not sure which to pick?
🎯 Take our quiz →🔒 Security & Compliance Comparison
Scroll horizontally to compare details.
Price Drop Alerts
Get notified when AI tools lower their prices
Get weekly AI agent tool insights
Comparisons, new tool launches, and expert recommendations delivered to your inbox.
Ready to Choose?
Read the full reviews to make an informed decision