LiveKit Agents vs Vapi
Detailed side-by-side comparison to help you choose the right tool
LiveKit Agents
🔴DeveloperVoice AI Tools
LiveKit Agents: Real-time media infrastructure platform with an integrated agent framework for building voice and video AI assistants that can participate in live conversations. Enables developers to build programmable AI agents for WebRTC rooms, SIP telephony, and multimodal applications.
Was this helpful?
Starting Price
FreeVapi
🔴DeveloperVoice AI agents
Platform for building, testing and deploying real-time voice agents for phone, SMS and chat workflows.
Was this helpful?
Starting Price
$0.05/minute + provider costsFeature Comparison
Scroll horizontally to compare details.
💡 Our Take
Choose LiveKit Agents over Vapi if your team needs open-source agent infrastructure, WebRTC rooms, video, self-hosting options, or deep control over realtime media and frontend state. Choose Vapi if you want a more packaged hosted voice-agent workflow.
LiveKit Agents - Pros & Cons
Pros
- ✓Free Build plan includes 1,000 agent session minutes monthly, 1 free telephony number, agent deployment, observability, inference credits, session metrics, analytics, and access to the global edge network.
- ✓Open-source framework and LiveKit media server can be run locally or self-hosted, which gives teams more deployment control than fully hosted-only voice agent platforms.
- ✓Supports both STT-to-LLM-to-TTS pipelines and realtime speech-to-speech model integrations through documented provider plugins.
- ✓Built on WebRTC with frontend SDKs in multiple languages, making it suitable for web, mobile, video, screen-sharing, and multi-participant real-time experiences rather than phone calls only.
- ✓Native SIP telephony support covers inbound calls, outbound calls, DTMF, and SIP REFER without requiring a separate voice-agent-specific phone stack.
- ✓Cloud pricing exposes concrete usage units for agent sessions, telephony, and inference, which helps teams estimate production costs.
Cons
- ✗Less turnkey than no-code voice agent platforms; teams need to write and operate Python or Node.js agent code.
- ✗The pricing model combines plan fees, agent session minutes, telephony, and inference, so realistic costs require modeling call volume and model choices rather than reading a single flat monthly price.
- ✗Advanced self-hosting still requires real-time infrastructure expertise, including WebRTC operations, media routing, deployment, monitoring, and scaling.
- ✗The free Build plan is useful for development but has limits, including 1,000 free monthly agent session minutes and documented free-plan quota constraints.
- ✗Some enterprise features, including SSO, support SLA, shared Slack channel, custom volume pricing, and private deployment discussions, require contacting sales.
Vapi - Pros & Cons
Pros
- ✓Clear usage-based hosting price: calls are listed at $0.05/min and SMS/chat at $0.005/message, excluding model-provider costs.
- ✓Strong orchestration layer for voice agents: telephony, custom voices/models, real-time monitoring, integrations, and enterprise configurability.
- ✓Enterprise proof points on the fetched homepage include 1B calls supported, 2.5M+ agents launched, 750K+ developers, <500ms average latency, and 99.9% uptime for enterprise clients.
Cons
- ✗Model costs for STT, LLM, and TTS are passed through separately, so the advertised $0.05/min is not the full all-in call cost.
- ✗Compliance add-ons are expensive for small teams: HIPAA is listed at $2,000/month and Zero Data Retention at $1,000/month.
- ✗Non-developers may find Vapi less turnkey than no-code voice-agent products because building reliable agents requires prompts, tools, telephony, analytics, and testing.
Not sure which to pick?
🎯 Take our quiz →🔒 Security & Compliance Comparison
Scroll horizontally to compare details.
Price Drop Alerts
Get notified when AI tools lower their prices
Get weekly AI agent tool insights
Comparisons, new tool launches, and expert recommendations delivered to your inbox.