LangSmith vs Humanloop

Detailed side-by-side comparison to help you choose the right tool

LangSmith

🔴Developer

Business Analytics

LangSmith lets you trace, analyze, and evaluate LLM applications and agents with deep observability into every model call, chain step, and tool invocation.

Was this helpful?

Starting Price

Free

Humanloop

🟡Low Code

Business Analytics

Former LLMOps platform for prompt engineering and evaluation, acquired by Anthropic in August 2025. Technology now integrated into Anthropic Console as the Workbench and Evaluations features.

Was this helpful?

Starting Price

Discontinued

Feature Comparison

Scroll horizontally to compare details.

FeatureLangSmithHumanloop
CategoryBusiness AnalyticsBusiness Analytics
Pricing Plans8 tiers36 tiers
Starting PriceFreeDiscontinued
Key Features
  • Workflow Runtime
  • Tool and API Connectivity
  • State and Context Handling

    LangSmith - Pros & Cons

    Pros

    • Comprehensive observability with detailed trace visualization
    • Native MCP support for universal agent tool deployment
    • Generous free tier for individual developers and small projects
    • No-code Agent Builder reduces technical barriers
    • Managed deployment infrastructure with production-ready scaling
    • Strong integration with entire LangChain ecosystem

    Cons

    • Primarily designed for LangChain applications (limited framework support)
    • Steep pricing jump from Plus to Enterprise tier
    • Pay-as-you-go model can become expensive for high-volume applications
    • Enterprise features require annual contracts
    • 14-day retention on base traces may be insufficient for some use cases

    Humanloop - Pros & Cons

    Pros

    • Core evaluation technology preserved and enhanced within Anthropic's enterprise platform with direct model provider integration
    • Pioneered evaluation-driven development methodology that became an industry standard for LLMOps
    • Prompt-as-code approach with version control, branching, and rollback brought software engineering rigor to prompt management
    • Human-in-the-loop workflows enabled domain experts to contribute to model improvement without engineering knowledge
    • Anthropic integration means evaluation tools now have native access to Claude model internals for deeper testing capabilities

    Cons

    • No longer available as a standalone product — requires commitment to Anthropic's ecosystem for continued access
    • Teams using non-Anthropic models (GPT, Gemini) lose access to Humanloop's model-agnostic evaluation capabilities
    • Migration from standalone Humanloop to Anthropic Console required significant workflow changes for existing customers
    • Some advanced features from the standalone product may not have full parity in the integrated Anthropic Console version

    Not sure which to pick?

    🎯 Take our quiz →

    🔒 Security & Compliance Comparison

    Scroll horizontally to compare details.

    Security FeatureLangSmithHumanloop
    SOC2✅ Yes
    GDPR✅ Yes
    HIPAA
    SSO✅ Yes
    Self-Hosted🔀 Hybrid
    On-Prem✅ Yes
    RBAC✅ Yes
    Audit Log✅ Yes
    Open Source❌ No
    API Key Auth✅ Yes
    Encryption at Rest✅ Yes
    Encryption in Transit✅ Yes
    Data ResidencyUS, EU
    Data Retentionconfigurable
    🦞

    New to AI tools?

    Learn how to run your first agent with OpenClaw

    🔔

    Price Drop Alerts

    Get notified when AI tools lower their prices

    Tracking 2 tools

    We only email when prices actually change. No spam, ever.

    Get weekly AI agent tool insights

    Comparisons, new tool launches, and expert recommendations delivered to your inbox.

    No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

    Ready to Choose?

    Read the full reviews to make an informed decision