Humanloop vs Langfuse

Detailed side-by-side comparison to help you choose the right tool

Humanloop

🔴Developer

LLM evaluation and governance

an LLM development platform for prompt management, evaluations, logging, and trustworthy AI product iteration; the homepage announces the team joining Anthropic.

Was this helpful?

Starting Price

Discontinued

Langfuse

🔴Developer

LLM Observability

Langfuse is an open-source LLM observability and engineering platform providing tracing, prompt management, evaluations, and dataset management for production AI applications.

Was this helpful?

Starting Price

Free

Feature Comparison

Scroll horizontally to compare details.

FeatureHumanloopLangfuse
CategoryLLM evaluation and governanceLLM Observability
Pricing Plans105 tiers38 tiers
Starting PriceDiscontinuedFree
Key Features
  • Prompt management and versioning
  • Evaluation reports and CI/CD integration
  • Datasets with online and offline evaluators
  • Hierarchical Tracing & Agent Debugging
  • Production Prompt Management & Versioning
  • LLM-as-Judge Evaluation Framework

💡 Our Take

Choose Anthropic Console (post-Humanloop) if you're a Fortune 500 Claude customer who values managed infrastructure and direct vendor accountability. Choose Langfuse if you need open-source self-hosting for data residency or air-gapped deployments, prefer a generous free tier for early-stage products, or want a model-agnostic platform that won't lock you into a single LLM provider — capabilities the standalone Humanloop offered but the integrated version no longer does.

Humanloop - Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Pricing page lists a free starting point: 2 members, 50 eval runs, and 10K logs per month.
  • Enterprise features include SSO/SAML, role-based access controls, SLA support, and VPC deployment add-on.
  • Strong fit for teams that need prompt engineering, evaluations, logs, and trustworthy LLM app iteration.

Cons

  • Homepage announces the Humanloop team is joining Anthropic and says the platform is being sunset, so new buyers must verify availability.
  • Enterprise pricing is custom and likely requires sales engagement.
  • No MCP support was visible in fetched pages.

Langfuse - Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Open source with free self-hosting — full feature parity without usage limits
  • Free Hobby tier on cloud with no credit card — lowest barrier to entry in the category
  • Trace graphs for multi-agent systems are genuinely useful for debugging complex failures
  • Prompt management + evals turns prompt engineering into a systematic, measurable process
  • 40,000+ builders using it — extensive community resources and integrations
  • Integrates natively with LangChain, LlamaIndex, OpenAI SDK, and Anthropic

Cons

  • Pro plan units pricing ($8/100k) can add up for high-volume production applications
  • Enterprise SSO requires the $300/month Teams add-on on top of Pro — costly for mid-size teams
  • Self-hosting requires Docker/Kubernetes operational knowledge
  • UI can feel overwhelming for teams who just want simple cost/latency dashboards
  • Real-time alerting features are less developed than commercial-first alternatives like Arize
  • Enterprise tier at $2,499/month is priced for large organizations — no mid-market option

Not sure which to pick?

🎯 Take our quiz →

🔒 Security & Compliance Comparison

Scroll horizontally to compare details.

Security FeatureHumanloopLangfuse
SOC2✅ Yes
GDPR✅ Yes
HIPAA✅ Yes
SSO✅ Yes
Self-Hosted
On-Prem✅ Yes
RBAC✅ Yes
Audit Log✅ Yes
Open Source✅ Yes
API Key Auth✅ Yes
Encryption at Rest✅ Yes
Encryption in Transit✅ Yes
Data ResidencyUS, EU, SELF-HOSTED
Data Retentionconfigurable
🦞

New to AI tools?

Read practical guides for choosing and using AI tools

🔔

Price Drop Alerts

Get notified when AI tools lower their prices

Tracking 2 tools

We only email when prices actually change. No spam, ever.

Get weekly AI agent tool insights

Comparisons, new tool launches, and expert recommendations delivered to your inbox.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Ready to Choose?

Read the full reviews to make an informed decision