Cogram vs 11x

Detailed side-by-side comparison to help you choose the right tool

Cogram

Voice AI Tools

AI meeting assistant built specifically for professional services firms—consulting, legal, and accounting—that automatically generates meeting summaries, action items, and follow-ups in real time. Cogram uses context-aware AI to understand industry-specific terminology and client relationships, then pushes structured outputs directly into CRMs and project management tools so nothing falls through the cracks between meetings and execution.

Was this helpful?

Starting Price

Custom

11x

🟢No Code

Voice AI Tools

11x provides AI digital workers for sales development, featuring Alice the AI SDR for autonomous outbound email prospecting and Julian the AI Phone Agent for intelligent voice conversations. The platform handles end-to-end sales development workflows including prospect identification, research, personalized outreach, follow-ups, and meeting scheduling — operating 24/7 to generate qualified pipeline at a fraction of the cost of human SDR teams.

Was this helpful?

Starting Price

~$5,000/month

Feature Comparison

Scroll horizontally to compare details.

FeatureCogram11x
CategoryVoice AI ToolsVoice AI Tools
Pricing Plans780 tiers17 tiers
Starting Price~$5,000/month
Key Features
  • Real-time meeting transcription with support for multiple speakers and industry-specific vocabulary
  • Automatic action item extraction that assigns owners and due dates based on conversation context
  • Native CRM integration with Salesforce, HubSpot, and other platforms to sync meeting notes and follow-ups automatically
  • AI SDR (Alice) for autonomous prospecting and outreach
  • AI Phone Agent (Julian) for intelligent voice conversations
  • Multi-channel outreach (email, LinkedIn, phone)

Cogram - Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Purpose-built for professional services workflows rather than general-purpose meeting recording, so outputs map directly to client deliverables—a vertical positioning that remains uncommon among meeting assistants
  • Native CRM sync with Salesforce and HubSpot keeps client records updated without manual data entry after every client call, addressing a persistent adoption problem in professional services where consultants often resist manual CRM logging
  • Action items include assigned owners and due dates extracted from conversation context, potentially reducing the significant post-meeting admin work that typically accompanies client-facing meetings
  • Handles industry-specific terminology in consulting, legal, and accounting better than general transcription tools that train on broader datasets like podcasts and casual conversations
  • Structured summary format separates decisions, risks, and next steps for easy scanning—useful for partners who skip meetings but need the takeaways in under 2 minutes of reading
  • Team-level analytics give managers visibility into follow-through rates and client engagement patterns, which most general-purpose competitors lack entirely

Cons

  • Pricing targets mid-market and enterprise teams—the Team plan reportedly starts at $29/user/month, which adds up quickly for solo practitioners or firms under 5 people compared to tools like Otter.ai (free tier available) or Fireflies (lower entry price)
  • Less suited for casual or internal brainstorming meetings where structured outputs and CRM sync add little value—you're paying for features you won't use
  • CRM integrations are strongest with Salesforce and HubSpot; firms using Pipedrive, Zoho, or industry-specific CRMs like Clio may need Zapier workarounds or API custom work on the Business plan
  • Relies on clear audio quality and speaker identification, which can degrade in large in-person meetings with shared microphones or poor room acoustics
  • Niche industry focus means the AI vocabulary models may not perform as well for firms outside consulting, legal, and accounting—tech startups or creative agencies would likely get more value from a general-purpose tool

11x - Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Deploys true end-to-end autonomous SDR workflow (prospecting, enrichment, personalization, sequencing, and meeting booking) without requiring human operators to manage campaigns or write templates, freeing sales teams to focus on closing deals rather than top-of-funnel activities.
  • Two coordinated digital workers (Alice for written outbound, Julian for voice) cover both email/LinkedIn and phone channels under one platform, eliminating the need to stitch together separate tools for multi-channel prospecting and reducing vendor sprawl.
  • Marketed cost savings of roughly 50% versus a human SDR team make the ROI case clear for enterprise buyers — Alice costs approximately $50,000–$60,000 annually compared to $100,000+ for a fully loaded human SDR including salary, benefits, tools, and management overhead.
  • Built-in access to a large prospect database of over 200 million contacts eliminates the need for separate data providers like ZoomInfo or Lusha, reducing total stack cost and simplifying the workflow from prospect identification to outreach execution.
  • Enterprise-grade positioning with offices in San Francisco and London, CRM integrations with Salesforce and HubSpot, SOC 2 Type II compliance, and GDPR-compliant data processing gives procurement and security teams confidence during vendor evaluation and approval.
  • 24/7 execution with continuous learning loops means campaigns optimize without manual A/B testing — Alice analyzes engagement data across all outreach to improve subject lines, messaging, and send timing automatically, compounding performance gains over time.

Cons

  • Enterprise-only annual pricing with no public self-serve tier shuts out SMBs, startups, and individual sales professionals who cannot commit $50,000+ annually or navigate a multi-week enterprise sales process just to evaluate the product.
  • AI-generated outbound at scale carries real deliverability and brand-reputation risk if email warm-up, domain rotation, and content quality are not carefully managed — some users report initial spam folder placement and inconsistent email quality across prospect segments.
  • Heavy reliance on automated outreach can trigger LinkedIn rate limits, account restrictions, or platform bans if volume thresholds are exceeded, particularly for users whose LinkedIn accounts lack established activity histories or connection networks.
  • The 'replace your SDR team' positioning has drawn public criticism from some early customers on Reddit and review sites who experienced underwhelming results, with complaints including poorly targeted prospects, generic-sounding personalization, and difficulty canceling annual contracts.
  • Limited transparency on pricing, contract minimums, and ramp expectations without going through a full sales process makes comparison shopping difficult and has eroded trust among prospects who feel pressured into commitments before fully understanding total cost of ownership.

Not sure which to pick?

🎯 Take our quiz →

🔒 Security & Compliance Comparison

Scroll horizontally to compare details.

Security FeatureCogram11x
SOC2✅ Yes
GDPR✅ Yes
HIPAA
SSO✅ Yes
Self-Hosted❌ No
On-Prem❌ No
RBAC✅ Yes
Audit Log✅ Yes
Open Source❌ No
API Key Auth
Encryption at Rest✅ Yes
Encryption in Transit✅ Yes
Data Residency
Data RetentionConfigurable data retention policies available for enterprise customers
🦞

New to AI tools?

Read practical guides for choosing and using AI tools

🔔

Price Drop Alerts

Get notified when AI tools lower their prices

Tracking 2 tools

We only email when prices actually change. No spam, ever.

Get weekly AI agent tool insights

Comparisons, new tool launches, and expert recommendations delivered to your inbox.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Ready to Choose?

Read the full reviews to make an informed decision