bolt.diy vs Lovable

Detailed side-by-side comparison to help you choose the right tool

bolt.diy

πŸ”΄Developer

AI App Builders

bolt.diy is the open-source, community-driven fork of Bolt.new from StackBlitz Labs β€” letting developers prompt, run, edit, and deploy full-stack web applications using any LLM they choose (OpenAI, Anthropic, Gemini, DeepSeek, Ollama, Groq, and more) on infrastructure they control.

Was this helpful?

Starting Price

Custom

Lovable

🟒No Code

AI App Builders

AI app builder that turns prompts, screenshots, and product ideas into editable web applications.

Was this helpful?

Starting Price

Custom

Feature Comparison

Scroll horizontally to compare details.

Featurebolt.diyLovable
CategoryAI App BuildersAI App Builders
Pricing Plans225 tiers107 tiers
Starting Price
Key Features
  • β€’ Prompt-based full-stack web application generation
  • β€’ Run, edit, and deploy workflow for web apps
  • β€’ Works with user-selected LLMs
  • β€’ Prompt-based web app generation
  • β€’ Unlimited lovable.app publishing on supported plans
  • β€’ Team workspace, user roles, and security features on higher tiers

bolt.diy - Pros & Cons

Pros

  • βœ“Public GitHub template with strong community signal: 19.5k stars and 10.4k forks were visible on the repository page in the 2026-06-15 capture.
  • βœ“Forked from stackblitz/bolt.new, so it targets the same prompt-run-edit-deploy workflow rather than a generic chatbot coding interface.
  • βœ“Designed around user-selected LLMs, which gives technical teams more flexibility than app builders tied to a single model provider.
  • βœ“The repository is public, so developers can inspect the code, fork it, and adapt the implementation to their own infrastructure.
  • βœ“The project shows active development signals with 77 issues and 39 pull requests visible on the GitHub page in the 2026-06-15 capture.
  • βœ“Best suited for developers who want more control over their AI app builder stack than hosted-only products usually allow.

Cons

  • βœ—No hosted product or managed onboarding is visible in the provided website content, so users should expect a developer-led setup process.
  • βœ—The GitHub page shows 77 issues and 39 pull requests, which can mean users may encounter unresolved bugs or fast-moving changes.
  • βœ—Pricing for model usage, hosting, and deployment is not published on the repository page, so total cost depends on the user’s own setup.
  • βœ—Non-technical users may find it harder to use than hosted AI app builders because the primary website is a GitHub repository.
  • βœ—Commercial support, enterprise SLAs, and managed security documentation are not visible in the provided website content.

Lovable - Pros & Cons

Pros

  • βœ“Fast prompt-to-app workflow for early product ideas
  • βœ“Supports screenshots and visual references
  • βœ“Template gallery covers common app and site patterns
  • βœ“Paid pricing is publicly listed for Pro and Business plans
  • βœ“Business plan includes team and security-oriented features
  • βœ“Generated apps can be previewed and iterated quickly

Cons

  • βœ—Credit-based usage can be harder to forecast than flat pricing
  • βœ—Advanced production apps still need engineering review
  • βœ—The strongest workflows depend on how well prompts and references describe the desired result
  • βœ—Business-critical apps require validation for security, data handling, and maintainability
  • βœ—Some vendor claims should be verified against current plan documentation before purchase

Not sure which to pick?

🎯 Take our quiz β†’
🦞

New to AI tools?

Read practical guides for choosing and using AI tools

πŸ””

Price Drop Alerts

Get notified when AI tools lower their prices

Tracking 2 tools

We only email when prices actually change. No spam, ever.

Get weekly AI agent tool insights

Comparisons, new tool launches, and expert recommendations delivered to your inbox.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Ready to Choose?

Read the full reviews to make an informed decision