bolt.diy vs Bolt.new
Detailed side-by-side comparison to help you choose the right tool
bolt.diy
🔴DeveloperAI App Builders
bolt.diy is the open-source, community-driven fork of Bolt.new from StackBlitz Labs — letting developers prompt, run, edit, and deploy full-stack web applications using any LLM they choose (OpenAI, Anthropic, Gemini, DeepSeek, Ollama, Groq, and more) on infrastructure they control.
Was this helpful?
Starting Price
CustomBolt.new
🟡Low CodeAI app builder
Bolt.new is a ai app builder focused on rapid prototypes, teaching web development.
Was this helpful?
Starting Price
Free; Pro from $25/monthFeature Comparison
Scroll horizontally to compare details.
💡 Our Take
Choose bolt.diy if you want a public GitHub template, source-level control, and flexibility around model choice. Choose Bolt.new if you prefer a managed hosted experience with less setup and do not need to run or modify the app-building stack yourself.
bolt.diy - Pros & Cons
Pros
- ✓Public GitHub template with strong community signal: 19.5k stars and 10.4k forks were visible on the repository page in the 2026-06-15 capture.
- ✓Forked from stackblitz/bolt.new, so it targets the same prompt-run-edit-deploy workflow rather than a generic chatbot coding interface.
- ✓Designed around user-selected LLMs, which gives technical teams more flexibility than app builders tied to a single model provider.
- ✓The repository is public, so developers can inspect the code, fork it, and adapt the implementation to their own infrastructure.
- ✓The project shows active development signals with 77 issues and 39 pull requests visible on the GitHub page in the 2026-06-15 capture.
- ✓Best suited for developers who want more control over their AI app builder stack than hosted-only products usually allow.
Cons
- ✗No hosted product or managed onboarding is visible in the provided website content, so users should expect a developer-led setup process.
- ✗The GitHub page shows 77 issues and 39 pull requests, which can mean users may encounter unresolved bugs or fast-moving changes.
- ✗Pricing for model usage, hosting, and deployment is not published on the repository page, so total cost depends on the user’s own setup.
- ✗Non-technical users may find it harder to use than hosted AI app builders because the primary website is a GitHub repository.
- ✗Commercial support, enterprise SLAs, and managed security documentation are not visible in the provided website content.
Bolt.new - Pros & Cons
Pros
- ✓Fastest path from idea to running web prototype when you do not want local setup
- ✓WebContainers make the browser feel closer to a real development environment than a static mockup tool
- ✓Generated code is visible and editable, which is better than opaque no-code builders
- ✓Good fit for demos, hackathons, classroom examples, and early product validation
Cons
- ✗Pricing could not be verified in this run because the vendor pricing page fetch failed; confirm token or plan limits before budgeting
- ✗AI-generated apps still need security review, dependency cleanup, and manual testing before production
- ✗Less suitable for mature codebases that already have CI, architecture rules, and local developer tooling
- ✗Complex backend requirements can outgrow a browser-first workflow quickly
Not sure which to pick?
🎯 Take our quiz →🔒 Security & Compliance Comparison
Scroll horizontally to compare details.
Price Drop Alerts
Get notified when AI tools lower their prices
Get weekly AI agent tool insights
Comparisons, new tool launches, and expert recommendations delivered to your inbox.