Activepieces vs Make.com

Detailed side-by-side comparison to help you choose the right tool

Activepieces

Automation

An AI-first automation platform designed for teams to streamline workflows and processes.

Was this helpful?

Starting Price

Custom

Full Review Visit Site

Make.com

🟢No Code

automation

Make.com: Visual automation platform with AI integration and workflow orchestration

Was this helpful?

Starting Price

Free

Full Review Visit Site

Feature Comparison

Scroll horizontally to compare details.

Feature	Activepieces	Make.com
Category	Automation	automation
Pricing Plans	8 tiers	4 tiers
Starting Price		Free
Key Features	• AI agents with custom instructions and tools • Visual drag-and-drop flow builder • 689+ native integrations	• Workflow Runtime • Tool and API Connectivity • State and Context Handling

💡 Our Take

Choose Activepieces if you want Make-level logic complexity but with predictable flat-rate pricing and built-in enterprise governance (SSO, SCIM, RBAC). Choose Make if you're already invested in its scenario model and prefer a visual canvas optimized for deeply branched data transformations over AI agent workflows.

Activepieces - Pros & Cons

Pros

✓Flat-rate pricing with $0 per execution means millions of runs cost the same as thousands — highly predictable at scale
✓689+ native integrations including Gmail, OpenAI, Slack, Notion, and HubSpot cover most mainstream SaaS needs
✓Open-source and self-hostable via Helm or Docker, so data can stay inside your network with no vendor lock-in
✓Enterprise governance is built in: SAML SSO, SCIM, RBAC, and audit logs come without third-party add-ons
✓Handles multi-step logic and branching more cleanly than Zapier, according to G2 and Trustpilot reviewers migrating from competitors
✓SOC 2 Type II and GDPR compliant managed cloud with EU and US data regions for regulated industries

Cons

✗Smaller integration catalog than Zapier's 7,000+ apps — niche or long-tail SaaS tools may require custom pieces
✗AI agent tooling is newer than the underlying automation engine, so advanced agent patterns may still be maturing
✗Self-hosting requires DevOps capacity to manage Helm charts, workers, and upgrades
✗Documentation and community are smaller than Zapier or Make, so troubleshooting edge cases may take longer
✗Paid tier pricing (Pro, Platform, Enterprise) is not published on the website — all require a sales conversation to get a quote, making it difficult to compare costs before committing to a demo

Make.com - Pros & Cons

Pros

✓Visual workflow builder
✓3,000+ app integrations
✓Make AI integration
✓Make Grid orchestration

Cons

✗Learning curve
✗Pricing consideration
✗Technical requirements

Not sure which to pick?

🎯 Take our quiz →

🔒 Security & Compliance Comparison

Scroll horizontally to compare details.

Security Feature	Activepieces	Make.com
SOC2	—	✅ Yes
GDPR	—	✅ Yes
HIPAA	—	✅ Yes
SSO	—	✅ Yes
Self-Hosted	—	❌ No
On-Prem	—	❌ No
RBAC	—	✅ Yes
Audit Log	—	✅ Yes
Open Source	—	❌ No
API Key Auth	—	✅ Yes
Encryption at Rest	—	✅ Yes
Encryption in Transit	—	✅ Yes
Data Residency	—	US, EU
Data Retention	—	configurable

🦞

New to AI tools?

Learn how to run your first agent with OpenClaw

Learn OpenClaw →

🔔

Price Drop Alerts

Get notified when AI tools lower their prices

Get weekly AI agent tool insights

Comparisons, new tool launches, and expert recommendations delivered to your inbox.

Ready to Choose?

Read the full reviews to make an informed decision

Review Activepieces Review Make.com