Activepieces vs Make.com
Detailed side-by-side comparison to help you choose the right tool
Activepieces
Automation & Workflows
Open-source workflow automation platform for app integrations, AI steps, and MCP-ready agents.
Was this helpful?
Starting Price
CustomMake.com
🟢No CodeAutomation & Workflows
Make.com: Visual automation platform with AI integration and workflow orchestration
Was this helpful?
Starting Price
FreeFeature Comparison
Scroll horizontally to compare details.
💡 Our Take
Choose Activepieces if you want Make-level logic complexity but with predictable flat-rate pricing and built-in enterprise governance (SSO, SCIM, RBAC). Choose Make if you're already invested in its scenario model and prefer a visual canvas optimized for deeply branched data transformations over AI agent workflows.
Activepieces - Pros & Cons
Pros
- ✓Open-source option is a real differentiator versus closed automation platforms.
- ✓Unlimited-user pricing is attractive for cross-functional teams.
- ✓Combines classic automation, AI steps, and MCP support in one platform.
- ✓Self-hosting helps with compliance and internal control.
Cons
- ✗Connector depth and UX are less mature than Zapier in some areas.
- ✗Advanced workflows may require JavaScript or debugging effort.
- ✗Task-based pricing can get expensive at scale.
- ✗Smaller ecosystem than longer-established automation rivals.
Make.com - Pros & Cons
Pros
- ✓Visual scenario builder supports routers, filters, scheduled runs, subscenarios, real-time execution monitoring, and reusable scenario templates.
- ✓Large connector ecosystem with 3,000+ standard apps, 350+ AI apps, and 300+ Make API endpoints for custom automation work.
- ✓Free plan includes 1,000 credits/month, 2 active scenarios, 3,000+ apps, routers and filters, and customer support with no time limit.
- ✓Paid plans support unlimited active scenarios, 1-minute scheduling, higher data transfer limits, and access to the Make API starting at $12/month for 10,000 credits.
- ✓Enterprise options include SSO, domain claim, on-prem agents for local systems such as SAP, advanced security features, 24/7 Enterprise support, and overage protection.
- ✓Make is used by 400,000+ customers across 200+ countries and territories, backed by a team of 350+ employees and parent company Celonis.
Cons
- ✗Credit-based billing can become hard to forecast because each module action in a scenario consumes credits.
- ✗The Free plan is limited to 1,000 credits/month, 2 active scenarios, 15-minute minimum scheduling, 5-minute maximum execution time, and 5 MB file processing.
- ✗Native AI features are useful for orchestration, but Make is not a full model development, vector database, or dedicated RAG platform.
- ✗Advanced governance and security features such as SSO, domain claim, audit logs, 24/7 support, and on-prem agents are Enterprise-oriented.
- ✗Complex scenarios still require careful technical design, especially when handling retries, data transformation, API limits, and high-volume AI calls.
Not sure which to pick?
🎯 Take our quiz →🔒 Security & Compliance Comparison
Scroll horizontally to compare details.
Price Drop Alerts
Get notified when AI tools lower their prices
Get weekly AI agent tool insights
Comparisons, new tool launches, and expert recommendations delivered to your inbox.
Ready to Choose?
Read the full reviews to make an informed decision