🚧 Coming Soon6 Platforms IncludedAdvancedšŸ¤– 5 Agentsā± 5 min - 1 hr

Code Review Pipeline

Automated code review system that checks quality, security vulnerabilities, performance issues, documentation coverage, and generates PR summaries.

Code & Development

šŸŽÆ Buy once, deploy on any framework

Includes implementations for OpenClaw, CrewAI, LangGraph, AutoGen, Semantic Kernel, Vanilla Python. One purchase — all platforms.

$0$258Save 100%
🚧 Coming Soon — $0

Be the first to know when this template launches

  • āœ“ All 6 platform implementations
  • āœ“ Full source code & documentation
  • āœ“ Commercial license included
  • āœ“ 30-day money-back guarantee
  • āœ“ Free updates for 1 year
  • āœ“ 30-day email support

Choose Your Platform

One purchase includes all 6 implementations. Deploy on whichever framework fits your stack.

šŸ¦ž

OpenClaw

One-Click Deployā± ~5 minutes

Install as an OpenClaw skill that auto-triggers on git push/PR events. Integrates with GitHub webhooks and posts review comments automatically.

Included in OpenClaw version

  • āœ“5 agent skill configs (.md)
  • āœ“AGENTS.md orchestration
  • āœ“GitHub webhook handler
  • āœ“Auto-comment integration
  • āœ“Cron for scheduled audits

⚔ Why OpenClaw?

One-click install, automatic orchestration, built-in cron scheduling, and memory integration. Other platforms require manual setup — OpenClaw gets you to production in minutes.

Code Preview — OpenClaw

install.sh
# Install the Code Review Pipeline skill pack
openclaw skills install code-review-pipeline

# AGENTS.md orchestration
# ─────────────────────────────────────
# ## Code Review Pipeline
# Triggered on: GitHub PR webhook
# 1. Code Reviewer checks quality & patterns
# 2. Security Scanner runs OWASP checks
# 3. Performance Analyst profiles complexity
# 4. Doc Checker verifies coverage
# 5. PR Summarizer posts combined review comment
#
# ## Cron: Weekly Security Audit
# 0 9 * * 1 — Full repo security scan every Monday
šŸ¦ž
OpenClaw
~5 minutes
šŸ¤–
CrewAI
~45 minutes
šŸ“Š
LangGraph
~1 hour
šŸ’¬
AutoGen
~30 minutes
šŸ”·
Semantic Kernel
~45 minutes
šŸ
Vanilla Python
~25 minutes

Agent Architecture

How the 5 agents work together

Input

Your data, triggers, or requests

↓
Agent 1

Code Reviewer

Code Quality & Best Practices

Reviews code for quality, readability, design patterns, and best practices. Provides actionable suggestions with code examples.

AST ParserLinter IntegrationPattern Matcher
Agent 2

Security Scanner

Vulnerability Detection

Scans for security vulnerabilities including OWASP Top 10, insecure dependencies, hardcoded secrets, and injection risks.

SAST EngineDependency CheckerSecrets Detector
Agent 3

Performance Analyst

Performance Optimization

Identifies performance bottlenecks, algorithmic inefficiencies, N+1 queries, and memory leaks.

Complexity AnalyzerMemory ProfilerQuery Optimizer
Agent 4

Documentation Checker

Documentation Coverage

Evaluates documentation coverage, identifies undocumented public APIs, and suggests documentation improvements.

Docstring ParserREADME AnalyzerAPI Doc Generator
Agent 5

PR Summarizer

Pull Request Summary Generation

Generates comprehensive PR summaries with change categories, impact assessment, and reviewer focus areas.

Diff AnalyzerImpact AssessorChange Categorizer
↓
Output

Structured results, reports, and actions

What's Included

Everything you get with this template

āœ“6 platform implementations (OpenClaw, CrewAI, LangGraph, AutoGen, Semantic Kernel, Vanilla Python)
āœ“5 specialized review agents per platform
āœ“GitHub/GitLab integration configs
āœ“CI/CD pipeline templates (GitHub Actions, GitLab CI)
āœ“Custom rule configuration
āœ“Security rule database
āœ“30-day email support
😤

The Problem

Code reviews are a bottleneck. Senior engineers spend 5-10 hours per week reviewing PRs, often catching the same patterns repeatedly. Security issues, performance problems, and documentation gaps slip through when reviewers are rushed.

✨

The Solution

A 5-agent review pipeline that automatically analyzes every PR for code quality, security vulnerabilities, performance issues, and documentation coverage. Generates actionable summaries so human reviewers can focus on what AI can't: architecture and design.

Tools You'll Need

Everything required to build this 5-agent system — click any tool for details

CrewAIRequiredFree

Agent orchestration for the 5-agent review crew

Together AIRequiredPay-per-token

LLM provider for code analysis

LangGraphOptionalFreemium

Parallel review branches with merge logic

LangSmithOptionalFreemium

Tracing review decisions and accuracy monitoring

E2B (Environment to Boot)OptionalFree tier with $100 credit, Pro $150/month plus per-second usage costs

Sandboxed code execution for testing fixes

SWE-agentOptionalFree

Automated code fix generation

Sentry AI MonitoringOptionalFreemium

Error tracking integration for production context

AgentOpsOptionalUnknown

Agent performance and cost monitoring

SupabaseOptionalFreemium

Review history and pattern tracking database

Slack APIOptionalFree for most features

Notifications for critical security findings

Implementation Guide

11 steps to build this system • 3-4 hours estimated

Advancedā± 3-4 hours

šŸ“‹ Prerequisites

Python 3.10+LLM API key (GPT-4 recommended)GitHub/GitLab access tokenOptional: CI/CD pipeline access
1

Set up GitHub webhook integration

Configure webhooks for PR creation/updates. Parse diffs, changed files, and PR metadata.

2

Build the Code Reviewer agent

Configure with language-specific prompts, best practices, and your team's coding standards.

3

Configure the Security Scanner

Set up OWASP Top 10 detection, dependency vulnerability checks, and secrets detection patterns.

šŸ“˜ Complete Blueprint

Get the Complete Implementation Guide

You've seen 3 of 11 steps. Get the full blueprint with architecture diagrams, production code, and deployment guides.

Free • No spam • Unsubscribe anytime

Use Cases

→Development teams wanting faster, more thorough code reviews
→Security-conscious teams needing automated vulnerability scanning
→Open source maintainers handling high PR volume
→Teams enforcing consistent coding standards

Code Preview

Sample agent setup — see platform-specific previews above

Preview only
main.py
from crewai import Agent, Task, Crew, Process

code_reviewer = Agent(
    role='Senior Code Reviewer',
    goal='Ensure code quality and best practices',
    backstory='10+ years of code review experience...',
    tools=[ast_parser, linter, pattern_matcher]
)

security_scanner = Agent(
    role='Application Security Engineer',
    goal='Find security vulnerabilities before production',
    backstory='OWASP expert, former pentester...',
    tools=[sast_engine, dep_checker, secrets_detector]
)

review_crew = Crew(
    agents=[code_reviewer, security_scanner, 
            perf_analyst, doc_checker, pr_summarizer],
    tasks=[review_task, security_task, perf_task,
           doc_task, summary_task],
    process=Process.sequential
)

Example Input & Output

See what goes in and what comes out

Input
{
  "repo": "acme/backend",
  "pr_number": 847,
  "diff": "+ def get_user(id):\n+     query = f'SELECT * FROM users WHERE id={id}'\n+     return db.execute(query)\n...",
  "files_changed": 12,
  "lines_added": 340
}
Output
## PR #847 Review Summary

šŸ”“ **1 Critical Security Issue**
- SQL injection in `get_user()` — uses f-string interpolation
  → Fix: Use parameterized queries

🟔 **2 Performance Warnings**
- N+1 query in `list_orders()` (line 84)
- Unbounded list growth in `process_batch()` (line 127)

🟢 **Code Quality: 8.2/10**
- Good separation of concerns
- Missing type hints in 3 functions

šŸ“ **Documentation: 65% coverage**
- 4 public functions missing docstrings

Requirements

šŸ
Python 3.10+ (or .NET 8 for Semantic Kernel C#)
āš™ļø
LLM API key (GPT-4 recommended)
šŸ”‘
GitHub/GitLab access token
ā˜ļø
Optional: CI/CD pipeline access

Reviews

What builders are saying

Reviews will be available after launch. Sign up above to be notified!

Frequently Asked Questions

Do I get all 6 platform implementations?+

Yes. One purchase includes OpenClaw (5-min setup), CrewAI, LangGraph, AutoGen, Semantic Kernel, and vanilla Python versions. Deploy on whichever platform your team uses.

Does this replace human code review?+

No — it augments it. The pipeline catches mechanical issues (security, performance, docs) so human reviewers can focus on architecture and design decisions.

What languages does it support?+

Python, JavaScript/TypeScript, Go, and Rust out of the box. The modular design makes adding other languages straightforward.

Can I integrate it with my CI/CD pipeline?+

Yes. Includes ready-to-use GitHub Actions and GitLab CI configs. The OpenClaw version auto-triggers on GitHub webhooks with zero CI config needed.

How accurate is the security scanning?+

The Security Scanner combines LLM analysis with rule-based checks (OWASP, CWE). It catches common vulnerabilities with high accuracy but should complement (not replace) dedicated SAST tools for critical applications.

Code Review Pipeline is coming soon

Be the first to know when this template launches. Sign up for launch notification above.

Browse Available Templates