Windsurf vs JetBrains AI Assistant

Detailed side-by-side comparison to help you choose the right tool

Windsurf

🔴Developer

AI Coding

Agentic IDE from the Codeium team (now under Cognition after the OpenAI acquisition drama) built around the Cascade agent — a flow-first editor that keeps you and the AI in sync as it edits, runs, and iterates across a whole codebase.

Was this helpful?

Starting Price

Free

JetBrains AI Assistant

AI Coding Tools

AI-powered plugin for JetBrains IDEs that enhances development workflow with intelligent code completion, next edit suggestions, AI chat with project context, and coding assistance inside JetBrains IDEs.

Was this helpful?

Starting Price

Custom

Feature Comparison

Scroll horizontally to compare details.

FeatureWindsurfJetBrains AI Assistant
CategoryAI CodingAI Coding Tools
Pricing Plans97 tiers4 tiers
Starting PriceFree
Key Features
  • Cascade agentic coding workflow inside an AI-native IDE
  • First-class support for major model providers and premium models
  • SWE-1.6/SWE model positioning, Fast Context, tab completions, and plan-based Cascade allowances
  • Mellum Local Code Completion
  • Junie Agent Mode
  • Next Edit Suggestions

Windsurf - Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Cascade is the strongest IDE-native multi-file planner in the category
  • SWE-1.7 is competitive with Claude and GPT-5 on real refactor tasks
  • First-class MCP client works across both Cascade and inline chat
  • Shared umbrella with Devin — one vendor for IDE agent + autonomous runs
  • Enterprise SSO and on-prem options make procurement easy for regulated orgs

Cons

  • Post-acquisition roadmap has caused some model-availability churn
  • Max tier at $200/month is only justified if you burn Cascade quotas daily
  • Smaller extension ecosystem than a vanilla VS Code environment
  • MCP server catalog isn't as curated as Cursor's or Cline's marketplaces

JetBrains AI Assistant - Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Deep native integration with JetBrains IDEs lets developers use AI assistance inside IntelliJ IDEA, PyCharm, WebStorm, GoLand, Rider, CLion, PhpStorm, RubyMine, DataGrip, DataSpell, Aqua, and related products instead of switching to a separate AI editor.
  • The 2026.1 IntelliJ IDEA Help page lists concrete workflow features: code completion, next edit suggestions, AI Chat, agent mode, context management, response processing, cloud LLM support, and local model use.
  • AI Chat can use explicit project context such as files, folders, images, symbols, commits, and other items, which is useful for questions tied to a real codebase rather than isolated snippets.
  • Response processing is practical inside the IDE because developers can review AI output and then apply code snippets, modify single or multiple files, or run terminal commands directly from AI Chat.
  • Pricing includes a no-cost AI Free tier with 3 AI Credits per 30 days and paid individual tiers starting at $10 USD per 30 days, which makes evaluation easier for existing JetBrains users before an organization rollout.
  • Supports both cloud-based providers named in the documentation, including Google Gemini, OpenAI, and Anthropic, and custom local third-party models for supported features such as code completion, in-editor code generation, or commit message generation.

Cons

  • JetBrains AI Assistant is not bundled or enabled by default; users must install the plugin, have a JetBrains AI Service license, and explicitly accept JetBrains AI terms before it can access code.
  • It is limited to the JetBrains IDE ecosystem, so teams using VS Code, Neovim, Sublime Text, or browser-based development environments will not get the same native plugin experience.
  • Cloud usage is quota-based: AI Free includes 3 AI Credits per 30 days, AI Pro includes 10 individual or 20 organization credits, and AI Ultimate includes 35 individual or 70 organization credits, so heavy agent or chat usage may require top-ups or a higher tier.
  • Advanced workflows such as agent mode, multi-file edits, terminal command execution, and generated tests still require careful developer review before code is merged.
  • Local model support exists, but setup and capability coverage are narrower than cloud use; the supplied data notes that MCP tool invocation is not currently supported when using local models.

Not sure which to pick?

🎯 Take our quiz →

🔒 Security & Compliance Comparison

Scroll horizontally to compare details.

Security FeatureWindsurfJetBrains AI Assistant
SOC2✅ Yes
GDPR✅ Yes
HIPAA
SSO✅ Yes
Self-Hosted✅ Yes
On-Prem✅ Yes
RBAC✅ Yes
Audit Log✅ Yes
Open Source❌ No
API Key Auth✅ Yes
Encryption at Rest✅ Yes
Encryption in Transit✅ Yes
Data ResidencyUS, EU
Data Retentionconfigurable
🦞

New to AI tools?

Read practical guides for choosing and using AI tools

🔔

Price Drop Alerts

Get notified when AI tools lower their prices

Tracking 2 tools

We only email when prices actually change. No spam, ever.

Get weekly AI agent tool insights

Comparisons, new tool launches, and expert recommendations delivered to your inbox.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Ready to Choose?

Read the full reviews to make an informed decision