Windsurf vs Augment Code

Detailed side-by-side comparison to help you choose the right tool

Windsurf

🔴Developer

AI Coding

Agentic IDE from the Codeium team (now under Cognition after the OpenAI acquisition drama) built around the Cascade agent — a flow-first editor that keeps you and the AI in sync as it edits, runs, and iterates across a whole codebase.

Was this helpful?

Starting Price

Free
Full ReviewVisit Site

Augment Code

🔴Developer

AI Coding

Enterprise-grade AI coding assistant with a proprietary Context Engine that indexes millions-of-line codebases in real time, plus an Auggie CLI agent — pitched at large engineering orgs where Cursor/Copilot lose the plot at scale.

Was this helpful?

Starting Price

Custom
Full ReviewVisit Site

Feature Comparison

Scroll horizontally to compare details.

FeatureWindsurfAugment Code
CategoryAI CodingAI Coding
Pricing Plans97 tiers4 tiers
Starting PriceFree
Key Features
  • • Cascade agentic coding workflow inside an AI-native IDE
  • • First-class support for major model providers and premium models
  • • SWE-1.6/SWE model positioning, Fast Context, tab completions, and plan-based Cascade allowances
  • • Context Engine for large-codebase understanding across organizational repositories
  • • Cosmos platform coordinating agents across triage, authoring, review, and verification
  • • MCP and native tools listed in pricing, plus SOC 2 Type II and no-AI-training language

Windsurf - Pros & Cons

Pros

  • ✓Cascade is the strongest IDE-native multi-file planner in the category
  • ✓SWE-1.7 is competitive with Claude and GPT-5 on real refactor tasks
  • ✓First-class MCP client works across both Cascade and inline chat
  • ✓Shared umbrella with Devin — one vendor for IDE agent + autonomous runs
  • ✓Enterprise SSO and on-prem options make procurement easy for regulated orgs

Cons

  • ✗Post-acquisition roadmap has caused some model-availability churn
  • ✗Max tier at $200/month is only justified if you burn Cascade quotas daily
  • ✗Smaller extension ecosystem than a vanilla VS Code environment
  • ✗MCP server catalog isn't as curated as Cursor's or Cline's marketplaces

Augment Code - Pros & Cons

Pros

  • ✓Repository-aware Context Engine is designed for monorepos and cross-service changes
  • ✓Works across VS Code, JetBrains, Vim/Neovim, terminal, GitHub, and Slack
  • ✓Agent instructions and enterprise deployment controls suit platform teams
  • ✓Auggie CLI supports repeatable terminal and CI workflows

Cons

  • ✗Published prices and quotas require manual verification because the vendor pages were unreachable
  • ✗A proprietary index is less transparent than open-source retrieval pipelines
  • ✗The strongest governance and deployment controls sit in sales-led tiers
  • ✗Smaller repositories may not benefit enough to justify another coding subscription

Not sure which to pick?

🎯 Take our quiz →

🔒 Security & Compliance Comparison

Scroll horizontally to compare details.

Security FeatureWindsurfAugment Code
SOC2✅ Yes—
GDPR✅ Yes—
HIPAA——
SSO✅ Yes—
Self-Hosted✅ Yes—
On-Prem✅ Yes—
RBAC✅ Yes—
Audit Log✅ Yes—
Open Source❌ No—
API Key Auth✅ Yes—
Encryption at Rest✅ Yes—
Encryption in Transit✅ Yes—
Data ResidencyUS, EU—
Data Retentionconfigurable—
🦞

New to AI tools?

Read practical guides for choosing and using AI tools

Read Guides →
🔔

Price Drop Alerts

Get notified when AI tools lower their prices

Tracking 2 tools

We only email when prices actually change. No spam, ever.

Get weekly AI agent tool insights

Comparisons, new tool launches, and expert recommendations delivered to your inbox.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Ready to Choose?

Read the full reviews to make an informed decision

Review WindsurfReview Augment Code