Dify vs Flowise

Detailed side-by-side comparison to help you choose the right tool

Dify

Integrations

Open-source LLMOps platform for building AI agents, RAG pipelines, and chatbots through a visual workflow builder. Supports all major LLM providers, MCP protocol, and self-hosting under Apache 2.0.

Was this helpful?

Starting Price

Free

Flowise

🟡Low Code

AI app platform

Flowise supports visual flow builder, agent orchestration, api deployment for prototyping assistants and low-code agent workflows.

Was this helpful?

Starting Price

Free

Feature Comparison

Scroll horizontally to compare details.

FeatureDifyFlowise
CategoryIntegrationsAI app platform
Pricing Plans8 tiers22 tiers
Starting PriceFreeFree
Key Features
    • • Visual node-based builder for AI agents and chatflows
    • • Agentflow multi-agent orchestration
    • • Chat assistants with RAG and tool calling

    Dify - Pros & Cons

    Pros

    • ✓Open-source with self-hosted option gives full control over data and removes vendor lock-in
    • ✓Visual workflow builder makes agent design accessible to non-engineers while still supporting complex logic
    • ✓MCP protocol support provides standardized tool integration as the ecosystem matures
    • ✓Supports all major LLM providers out of the box with easy model swapping
    • ✓Active community with 50,000+ GitHub stars and regular releases
    • ✓Free self-hosted deployment with no feature restrictions

    Cons

    • ✗Cloud pricing is per-workspace, which gets expensive fast with multiple projects
    • ✗200-credit sandbox barely scratches the surface for real evaluation
    • ✗Visual builder hits a ceiling with very complex custom logic that's easier to express in code
    • ✗Self-hosted deployment requires Docker infrastructure management and ongoing maintenance
    • ✗Knowledge base features are solid but less flexible than dedicated RAG frameworks like LlamaIndex

    Flowise - Pros & Cons

    Pros

    • ✓Apache 2.0 self-hosting offers strong control and flexibility
    • ✓Visual editing speeds up prototypes and stakeholder demos
    • ✓Many connectors cover common model and retrieval stacks
    • ✓Each flow can become an API rather than staying a diagram

    Cons

    • ✗Complex canvases can become hard to maintain
    • ✗Self-hosters own authentication, upgrades, monitoring, and scaling
    • ✗Breaking changes require version pinning and testing
    • ✗Cloud execution limits can affect chatty or high-volume agents

    Not sure which to pick?

    🎯 Take our quiz →

    🔒 Security & Compliance Comparison

    Scroll horizontally to compare details.

    Security FeatureDifyFlowise
    SOC2——
    GDPR——
    HIPAA——
    SSO——
    Self-Hosted—✅ Yes
    On-Prem—✅ Yes
    RBAC—✅ Yes
    Audit Log——
    Open Source—✅ Yes
    API Key Auth—✅ Yes
    Encryption at Rest——
    Encryption in Transit—✅ Yes
    Data Residency—self-hosted deployments allow user-controlled data residency
    Data Retention—configurable
    🦞

    New to AI tools?

    Read practical guides for choosing and using AI tools

    🔔

    Price Drop Alerts

    Get notified when AI tools lower their prices

    Tracking 2 tools

    We only email when prices actually change. No spam, ever.

    Get weekly AI agent tool insights

    Comparisons, new tool launches, and expert recommendations delivered to your inbox.

    No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

    Ready to Choose?

    Read the full reviews to make an informed decision