Devin vs Cody by Sourcegraph

Detailed side-by-side comparison to help you choose the right tool

Devin

🟡Low Code

AI Development Assistants

AI software engineer that codes, fixes bugs, and ships features autonomously. Builds full applications end-to-end with minimal supervision.

Was this helpful?

Starting Price

From $20/month
Full ReviewVisit Site

Cody by Sourcegraph

🔴Developer

AI Development Assistants

AI coding assistant powered by Sourcegraph's code intelligence platform, providing full codebase context awareness across repositories for code generation, Q&A, and refactoring.

Was this helpful?

Starting Price

Free
Full ReviewVisit Site

Feature Comparison

Scroll horizontally to compare details.

FeatureDevinCody by Sourcegraph
CategoryAI Development AssistantsAI Development Assistants
Pricing Plans75 tiers8 tiers
Starting PriceFrom $20/monthFree
Key Features
    • • AI-powered code completion with codebase context
    • • Natural language chat for code Q&A and generation
    • • Auto-edit suggestions based on cursor and editing patterns

    Devin - Pros & Cons

    Pros

    • ✓Truly autonomous coding agent (plans and executes independently)
    • ✓Full development environment with browser and shell
    • ✓Can handle complex multi-file changes
    • ✓Integrates with GitHub and Slack workflows
    • ✓Learns from codebase context

    Cons

    • ✗Expensive at $500/month minimum
    • ✗ACU-based pricing can escalate quickly
    • ✗Still requires human review for critical code
    • ✗No native MCP support
    • ✗Output quality varies on complex tasks

    Cody by Sourcegraph - Pros & Cons

    Pros

    • ✓Industry-leading codebase context awareness powered by Sourcegraph's code intelligence — understands cross-repository dependencies, call graphs, and type hierarchies
    • ✓Multi-LLM flexibility lets developers choose the best AI model for each task without workflow changes
    • ✓Strong enterprise adoption with proven scale — trusted by 4/6 top US banks and 7/10 top public tech companies
    • ✓Amp agentic coding extends capabilities with autonomous multi-mode agent (Smart, Rush, Deep) and team thread sharing
    • ✓Comprehensive IDE support covering VS Code, JetBrains, Visual Studio, Neovim, and Zed
    • ✓Code attribution checking provides critical licensing compliance guardrails for enterprise teams
    • ✓Privacy-first architecture — no training on customer code, full data isolation options, detailed audit logs
    • ✓Auto-edit feature proactively suggests changes based on cursor position and editing patterns

    Cons

    • ✗Full enterprise context features require deploying and configuring Sourcegraph's code intelligence platform
    • ✗Free tier usage limits are more restrictive than some competitors like GitHub Copilot's free offering
    • ✗Maximum value requires proper codebase indexing setup — context quality scales with indexing completeness
    • ✗Smaller extension marketplace compared to GitHub Copilot's broader third-party integration ecosystem
    • ✗Amp (the agentic evolution) is a separate product requiring additional onboarding and different workflows
    • ✗Enterprise deployment complexity can be significant for smaller teams without dedicated DevOps resources
    • ✗Learning curve to leverage advanced features like custom prompts, context filters, and @-mentions effectively

    Not sure which to pick?

    🎯 Take our quiz →
    🦞

    New to AI tools?

    Learn how to run your first agent with OpenClaw

    Learn OpenClaw →
    🔔

    Price Drop Alerts

    Get notified when AI tools lower their prices

    Tracking 2 tools

    We only email when prices actually change. No spam, ever.

    Get weekly AI agent tool insights

    Comparisons, new tool launches, and expert recommendations delivered to your inbox.

    No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

    Ready to Choose?

    Read the full reviews to make an informed decision

    Review DevinReview Cody by Sourcegraph