Sourcegraph Cody vs Augment Code

Detailed side-by-side comparison to help you choose the right tool

Sourcegraph Cody

🔴Developer

Developer Tools

Sourcegraph Cody is an enterprise AI coding assistant that uses Sourcegraph code context to help developers search, understand, write, and fix code.

Was this helpful?

Starting Price

Custom

🔴Developer

Developer Tools

Augment Code is an AI coding assistant and agentic development platform built for large-codebase context, engineering workflows, and teams.

Was this helpful?

Starting Price

Custom

Scroll horizontally to compare details.

Feature	Sourcegraph Cody	Augment Code
Category	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Pricing Plans	206 tiers	4 tiers
Starting Price
Key Features	• AI coding assistant for understanding, writing, and fixing code • Available in VS Code, JetBrains, Visual Studio, Sourcegraph web app, and CLI • Developer chat, code completions, code edits, and customizable prompts	• Context Engine for large-codebase understanding across organizational repositories • Cosmos platform coordinating agents across triage, authoring, review, and verification • MCP and native tools listed in pricing, plus SOC 2 Type II and no-AI-training language

✓Codebase-wide context is useful for large repositories, monorepos, and cross-service discovery
✓Supports multiple developer surfaces: VS Code, JetBrains, Visual Studio, web app, and CLI
✓Enterprise plan includes Sourcegraph platform capabilities such as Full MCP Server, API, CLI, security/admin controls, and 24x5 support
✓Strong fit for onboarding, code explanation, test generation, and finding existing implementation patterns

✗Enterprise starting price of $16K can be too high for solo developers and small teams
✗Final cost depends on seats, AI feature credits, deployment model, and support terms that must be confirmed with sales
✗Quality depends on Sourcegraph indexing, repository permissions, codebase hygiene, and human code review
✗Teams that only need lightweight autocomplete may find Cody more platform-heavy than necessary

✓Pricing is specific: Indie $20/month, Standard $60/developer/month, Max $200/developer/month, Enterprise custom
✓Vendor claims operational metrics such as 4x ship-cycle improvement, 70%+ pages resolved early, and 30% fewer engineering hours
✓Designed for organizations and large codebases, not only solo autocomplete use

✗Credit allowances require operational tracking, especially for teams running agents heavily
✗The strongest organizational features are likely most valuable on higher tiers or Enterprise
✗Teams with small repos may not need its large-context and cross-agent coordination layer

Not sure which to pick?

🦞

Read practical guides for choosing and using AI tools

🔔

Get notified when AI tools lower their prices

Comparisons, new tool launches, and expert recommendations delivered to your inbox.

Read the full reviews to make an informed decision