Sourcegraph Cody vs Augment Code

Detailed side-by-side comparison to help you choose the right tool

Sourcegraph Cody

πŸ”΄Developer

Developer Tools

Sourcegraph Cody is an AI coding assistant for code search, editor chat, completions, and code edits across large repositories.

Was this helpful?

Starting Price

Custom

Augment Code

πŸ”΄Developer

Developer Tools

Augment Code is an AI coding assistant and agentic development platform built for large-codebase context, engineering workflows, and teams.

Was this helpful?

Starting Price

Custom

Feature Comparison

Scroll horizontally to compare details.

FeatureSourcegraph CodyAugment Code
CategoryDeveloper ToolsDeveloper Tools
Pricing Plans92 tiers4 tiers
Starting Price
Key Features
  • β€’ Codebase-aware chat that uses Sourcegraph search context across local and remote repositories
  • β€’ Editor support for VS Code, JetBrains, Visual Studio, and the web app
  • β€’ Developer chat, code completions, code edits, and customizable prompts
  • β€’ Context Engine for large-codebase understanding across organizational repositories
  • β€’ Cosmos platform coordinating agents across triage, authoring, review, and verification
  • β€’ MCP and native tools listed in pricing, plus SOC 2 Type II and no-AI-training language

Sourcegraph Cody - Pros & Cons

Pros

  • βœ“Strong differentiator is Sourcegraph’s code search context, especially across large or remote codebases
  • βœ“Supports major IDEs rather than requiring every developer to move into a new editor
  • βœ“Useful for understanding APIs, symbols, and usage patterns across enterprise repositories

Cons

  • βœ—Pricing route returned 404 during curl research, so current pricing must be manually verified
  • βœ—Best value is tied to Sourcegraph adoption; standalone value may be lower for small teams
  • βœ—No confirmed MCP support was found in the fetched pages

Augment Code - Pros & Cons

Pros

  • βœ“Pricing is specific: Indie $20/month, Standard $60/developer/month, Max $200/developer/month, Enterprise custom
  • βœ“Vendor claims operational metrics such as 4x ship-cycle improvement, 70%+ pages resolved early, and 30% fewer engineering hours
  • βœ“Designed for organizations and large codebases, not only solo autocomplete use

Cons

  • βœ—Credit allowances require operational tracking, especially for teams running agents heavily
  • βœ—The strongest organizational features are likely most valuable on higher tiers or Enterprise
  • βœ—Teams with small repos may not need its large-context and cross-agent coordination layer

Not sure which to pick?

🎯 Take our quiz β†’
🦞

New to AI tools?

Read practical guides for choosing and using AI tools

πŸ””

Price Drop Alerts

Get notified when AI tools lower their prices

Tracking 2 tools

We only email when prices actually change. No spam, ever.

Get weekly AI agent tool insights

Comparisons, new tool launches, and expert recommendations delivered to your inbox.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Ready to Choose?

Read the full reviews to make an informed decision