Sourcegraph Amp vs Windsurf
Detailed side-by-side comparison to help you choose the right tool
Sourcegraph Amp
🔴DeveloperAI Coding
Sourcegraph Amp is Sourcegraph's frontier-model coding agent built for monorepos, with live access to the Sourcegraph code graph and MCP support.
Was this helpful?
Starting Price
Pay-as-you-goWindsurf
🔴DeveloperAI coding assistant
An agentic coding environment for editing, understanding, and generating software.
Was this helpful?
Starting Price
FreeFeature Comparison
Scroll horizontally to compare details.
Sourcegraph Amp - Pros & Cons
Pros
- ✓Monorepo code-graph grounding beats embedding-only competitors on large repos.
- ✓Pass-through token pricing rewards heavy use instead of capping it.
- ✓Shared threads across VS Code and CLI match how senior engineers actually work.
Cons
- ✗No managed model — you bring API keys, which is friction for team buyers.
- ✗VS Code extension is newer and less polished than the established Cody extension.
- ✗CLI is powerful but documentation still lags the product roadmap.
Windsurf - Pros & Cons
Pros
- ✓Keeps code generation and repository exploration inside the editor
- ✓Coordinates changes across multiple files instead of returning isolated snippets
- ✓MCP client support expands the tools an agent can use
- ✓Strong fit for feature work, refactoring, and unfamiliar repositories
Cons
- ✗Homepage and pricing page returned HTTP 429, so current prices need manual verification
- ✗Large generated diffs can increase review burden and hide regressions
- ✗MCP servers expand the permission and security surface
- ✗Generated code still requires tests, security review, and human approval
Not sure which to pick?
🎯 Take our quiz →🔒 Security & Compliance Comparison
Scroll horizontally to compare details.
🦞
🔔
Price Drop Alerts
Get notified when AI tools lower their prices
Get weekly AI agent tool insights
Comparisons, new tool launches, and expert recommendations delivered to your inbox.
Ready to Choose?
Read the full reviews to make an informed decision