Sourcegraph Amp vs Devin

Detailed side-by-side comparison to help you choose the right tool

Sourcegraph Amp

🔴Developer

AI Coding

Sourcegraph Amp is Sourcegraph's frontier-model coding agent built for monorepos, with live access to the Sourcegraph code graph and MCP support.

Was this helpful?

Starting Price

Custom
Full ReviewVisit Site

Devin

🔴Developer

AI Coding

Devin is an autonomous AI software engineer by Cognition that plans, executes, and reports on complex engineering tasks without constant human input.

Was this helpful?

Starting Price

$500/mo
Full ReviewVisit Site

Feature Comparison

Scroll horizontally to compare details.

FeatureSourcegraph AmpDevin
CategoryAI CodingAI Coding
Pricing Plans98 tiers122 tiers
Starting Price$500/mo
Key Features
  • • Frontier-model agent grounded in Sourcegraph's code graph
  • • Monorepo-scale code intelligence: references, call sites, dependencies
  • • Shared threads between VS Code and CLI
  • • Cloud AI software engineering agent
  • • Plans, codes, tests, and opens pull requests
  • • Parallel task execution for migrations and refactors

Sourcegraph Amp - Pros & Cons

Pros

  • ✓Monorepo code-graph grounding beats embedding-only competitors on large repos.
  • ✓Pass-through token pricing rewards heavy use instead of capping it.
  • ✓Shared threads across VS Code and CLI match how senior engineers actually work.

Cons

  • ✗No managed model — you bring API keys, which is friction for team buyers.
  • ✗VS Code extension is newer and less polished than the established Cody extension.
  • ✗CLI is powerful but documentation still lags the product roadmap.

Devin - Pros & Cons

Pros

  • ✓Genuinely autonomous — handles multi-step tasks without constant prompting
  • ✓Parallel agents allow multiple tasks to run simultaneously
  • ✓Documented enterprise case studies with real efficiency numbers (12x at Nubank)
  • ✓Core plan entry price dropped from $500 to $20 in 2026, much more accessible
  • ✓Works inside existing GitHub/Slack/CI workflows
  • ✓Can tackle migrations and test generation at scale that would be prohibitively manual

Cons

  • ✗ACU costs add up fast on longer tasks — real monthly spend can reach $300-500
  • ✗Struggles with ambiguous or architecture-level tasks that require deep context
  • ✗Output still needs human review before merging PRs
  • ✗Not an in-editor experience — separate from Cursor, VS Code workflows
  • ✗Requires clear task specifications to produce good output
  • ✗Enterprise features (VPC, SSO) only available at custom pricing tiers

Not sure which to pick?

🎯 Take our quiz →

🔒 Security & Compliance Comparison

Scroll horizontally to compare details.

Security FeatureSourcegraph AmpDevin
SOC2—✅ Yes
GDPR——
HIPAA——
SSO—✅ Yes
Self-Hosted—❌ No
On-Prem—❌ No
RBAC—✅ Yes
Audit Log——
Open Source—❌ No
API Key Auth—✅ Yes
Encryption at Rest—✅ Yes
Encryption in Transit—✅ Yes
Data Residency——
Data Retention——
🦞

New to AI tools?

Read practical guides for choosing and using AI tools

Read Guides →
🔔

Price Drop Alerts

Get notified when AI tools lower their prices

Tracking 2 tools

We only email when prices actually change. No spam, ever.

Get weekly AI agent tool insights

Comparisons, new tool launches, and expert recommendations delivered to your inbox.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Ready to Choose?

Read the full reviews to make an informed decision

Review Sourcegraph AmpReview Devin