Sourcegraph Amp vs Cursor

Detailed side-by-side comparison to help you choose the right tool

Sourcegraph Amp

🔴Developer

AI Coding

Sourcegraph Amp is Sourcegraph's frontier-model coding agent built for monorepos, with live access to the Sourcegraph code graph and MCP support.

Was this helpful?

Starting Price

Custom
Full ReviewVisit Site

Cursor

🔴Developer

AI Development Assistants

AI-first code editor with autonomous coding capabilities. Understands your codebase and writes code collaboratively with you.

Was this helpful?

Starting Price

Free
Full ReviewVisit Site

Feature Comparison

Scroll horizontally to compare details.

FeatureSourcegraph AmpCursor
CategoryAI CodingAI Development Assistants
Pricing Plans98 tiers8 tiers
Starting PriceFree
Key Features
  • • Frontier-model agent grounded in Sourcegraph's code graph
  • • Monorepo-scale code intelligence: references, call sites, dependencies
  • • Shared threads between VS Code and CLI

    Sourcegraph Amp - Pros & Cons

    Pros

    • ✓Monorepo code-graph grounding beats embedding-only competitors on large repos.
    • ✓Pass-through token pricing rewards heavy use instead of capping it.
    • ✓Shared threads across VS Code and CLI match how senior engineers actually work.

    Cons

    • ✗No managed model — you bring API keys, which is friction for team buyers.
    • ✗VS Code extension is newer and less polished than the established Cody extension.
    • ✗CLI is powerful but documentation still lags the product roadmap.

    Cursor - Pros & Cons

    Pros

    • ✓Deep codebase indexing means AI suggestions and agent actions reference real code across the entire repository, not just the open file
    • ✓Tab autocomplete predicts multi-line and multi-file edits with unusually high accuracy, often catching the developer's next intent
    • ✓Agents can run in the editor, cloud, CLI, or mobile, so long tasks don't block local work and can be checked in from anywhere
    • ✓Built on VS Code, so existing extensions, keybindings, themes, and muscle memory transfer with almost no learning curve
    • ✓Cursor Rules let teams encode conventions and architectural constraints that the AI follows consistently across the codebase
    • ✓Access to frontier models from Anthropic, OpenAI, Google, and xAI with per-task model switching and automatic routing

    Cons

    • ✗Heavy AI usage burns through monthly request quotas quickly, pushing many serious users toward higher-tier plans
    • ✗Performance can degrade on very large monorepos during initial indexing or when many parallel agents are running
    • ✗Being a VS Code fork means it lags slightly behind upstream VS Code releases and occasionally breaks niche extensions
    • ✗Agent autonomy can produce confidently wrong multi-file changes that are tedious to unwind without disciplined version control
    • ✗Privacy-conscious teams must explicitly enable privacy mode and review enterprise terms before sending proprietary code to model providers

    Not sure which to pick?

    🎯 Take our quiz →

    🔒 Security & Compliance Comparison

    Scroll horizontally to compare details.

    Security FeatureSourcegraph AmpCursor
    SOC2—✅ Yes
    GDPR—✅ Yes
    HIPAA——
    SSO—🏢 Enterprise
    Self-Hosted—❌ No
    On-Prem—❌ No
    RBAC—🏢 Enterprise
    Audit Log——
    Open Source—❌ No
    API Key Auth—❌ No
    Encryption at Rest—✅ Yes
    Encryption in Transit—✅ Yes
    Data Residency——
    Data Retention—configurable
    🦞

    New to AI tools?

    Read practical guides for choosing and using AI tools

    Read Guides →
    🔔

    Price Drop Alerts

    Get notified when AI tools lower their prices

    Tracking 2 tools

    We only email when prices actually change. No spam, ever.

    Get weekly AI agent tool insights

    Comparisons, new tool launches, and expert recommendations delivered to your inbox.

    No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

    Ready to Choose?

    Read the full reviews to make an informed decision

    Review Sourcegraph AmpReview Cursor