Sourcegraph Amp vs Continue
Detailed side-by-side comparison to help you choose the right tool
Sourcegraph Amp
🔴DeveloperAI Coding
Sourcegraph Amp is Sourcegraph's frontier-model coding agent built for monorepos, with live access to the Sourcegraph code graph and MCP support.
Was this helpful?
Starting Price
CustomContinue
🔴DeveloperAI Coding
Open-source AI code assistant for VS Code and JetBrains with a hub for custom assistants, MCP tools, prompts, and rules — the go-to when a team wants a Copilot-shaped experience they fully control.
Was this helpful?
Starting Price
CustomFeature Comparison
Scroll horizontally to compare details.
Sourcegraph Amp - Pros & Cons
Pros
- ✓Monorepo code-graph grounding beats embedding-only competitors on large repos.
- ✓Pass-through token pricing rewards heavy use instead of capping it.
- ✓Shared threads across VS Code and CLI match how senior engineers actually work.
Cons
- ✗No managed model — you bring API keys, which is friction for team buyers.
- ✗VS Code extension is newer and less polished than the established Cody extension.
- ✗CLI is powerful but documentation still lags the product roadmap.
Continue - Pros & Cons
Pros
- ✓Supports chat, autocomplete, edits, and agents in VS Code and JetBrains
- ✓Works with hosted, self-hosted, and local model providers
- ✓Versioned assistants package models, rules, docs, prompts, and tools
- ✓Apache 2.0 licensing gives teams meaningful control over deployment
Cons
- ✗Model and embedding configuration can be more work than a bundled assistant
- ✗Local models require capable hardware and careful quality testing
- ✗Team-tier prices and exact entitlements were not independently verified
- ✗A broad provider matrix can create inconsistent experiences across developers
Not sure which to pick?
🎯 Take our quiz →🦞
🔔
Price Drop Alerts
Get notified when AI tools lower their prices
Get weekly AI agent tool insights
Comparisons, new tool launches, and expert recommendations delivered to your inbox.
Ready to Choose?
Read the full reviews to make an informed decision