Sourcegraph Amp vs Augment Code

Detailed side-by-side comparison to help you choose the right tool

Sourcegraph Amp

🔴Developer

AI Coding

Sourcegraph Amp is Sourcegraph's frontier-model coding agent built for monorepos, with live access to the Sourcegraph code graph and MCP support.

Was this helpful?

Starting Price

Custom

Augment Code

🔴Developer

AI Coding

Enterprise-grade AI coding assistant with a proprietary Context Engine that indexes millions-of-line codebases in real time, plus an Auggie CLI agent — pitched at large engineering orgs where Cursor/Copilot lose the plot at scale.

Was this helpful?

Starting Price

Custom

Feature Comparison

Scroll horizontally to compare details.

FeatureSourcegraph AmpAugment Code
CategoryAI CodingAI Coding
Pricing Plans98 tiers4 tiers
Starting Price
Key Features
  • Frontier-model agent grounded in Sourcegraph's code graph
  • Monorepo-scale code intelligence: references, call sites, dependencies
  • Shared threads between VS Code and CLI
  • Context Engine for large-codebase understanding across organizational repositories
  • Cosmos platform coordinating agents across triage, authoring, review, and verification
  • MCP and native tools listed in pricing, plus SOC 2 Type II and no-AI-training language

Sourcegraph Amp - Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Monorepo code-graph grounding beats embedding-only competitors on large repos.
  • Pass-through token pricing rewards heavy use instead of capping it.
  • Shared threads across VS Code and CLI match how senior engineers actually work.

Cons

  • No managed model — you bring API keys, which is friction for team buyers.
  • VS Code extension is newer and less polished than the established Cody extension.
  • CLI is powerful but documentation still lags the product roadmap.

Augment Code - Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Repository-aware Context Engine is designed for monorepos and cross-service changes
  • Works across VS Code, JetBrains, Vim/Neovim, terminal, GitHub, and Slack
  • Agent instructions and enterprise deployment controls suit platform teams
  • Auggie CLI supports repeatable terminal and CI workflows

Cons

  • Published prices and quotas require manual verification because the vendor pages were unreachable
  • A proprietary index is less transparent than open-source retrieval pipelines
  • The strongest governance and deployment controls sit in sales-led tiers
  • Smaller repositories may not benefit enough to justify another coding subscription

Not sure which to pick?

🎯 Take our quiz →
🦞

New to AI tools?

Read practical guides for choosing and using AI tools

🔔

Price Drop Alerts

Get notified when AI tools lower their prices

Tracking 2 tools

We only email when prices actually change. No spam, ever.

Get weekly AI agent tool insights

Comparisons, new tool launches, and expert recommendations delivered to your inbox.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Ready to Choose?

Read the full reviews to make an informed decision