Semgrep vs Checkmarx One
Detailed side-by-side comparison to help you choose the right tool
Semgrep
🔴DeveloperApplication Security
Semgrep provides AI-assisted application security capabilities for secure code review.
Was this helpful?
Starting Price
CustomCheckmarx One
Application Security
Checkmarx One is an enterprise application security platform with AI-assisted capabilities for identifying, prioritizing, and remediating vulnerabilities across the software development lifecycle.
Was this helpful?
Starting Price
CustomFeature Comparison
Scroll horizontally to compare details.
Semgrep - Pros & Cons
Pros
- ✓Rules are readable enough for security engineers and developers to review
- ✓Fast local and CI feedback can find issues before production
- ✓Custom rules let teams encode recurring secure-coding requirements
- ✓SAST, dependency, and secrets findings can share one remediation workflow
Cons
- ✗Commercial pricing and exact feature boundaries were not verified
- ✗Custom rules require maintenance as frameworks and coding patterns change
- ✗Broad rulesets can create noisy findings without tuning
- ✗Static analysis cannot prove runtime exploitability or replace penetration testing
Checkmarx One - Pros & Cons
Pros
- ✓Consolidates SAST, SCA, IaC, API security, container scanning, and DAST in a single platform, reducing tool sprawl and procurement overhead for enterprise AppSec programs
- ✓AI-assisted remediation generates contextual, language-specific fix suggestions directly in the IDE and PR workflow, helping developers resolve vulnerabilities without deep security expertise
- ✓Strong correlation and prioritization engine reduces noise by linking findings across engines and flagging only exploitable, reachable issues rather than overwhelming developers with raw scanner output
- ✓Deep integration with the developer toolchain — GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Azure DevOps, Jenkins, Jira, VS Code, IntelliJ — keeps security feedback inside existing workflows
- ✓Backed by Checkmarx's mature SAST engine with broad language coverage (35+ languages and frameworks) and a long track record in regulated industries like finance, healthcare, and government
- ✓Includes capabilities to scan AI-generated code and govern usage of AI coding assistants, addressing an emerging risk category that newer point tools often miss
Cons
- ✗Enterprise-only pricing with no public tiers, free tier, or self-serve onboarding makes it inaccessible for startups, small teams, and individual developers
- ✗Initial configuration, policy tuning, and integration into existing CI/CD pipelines can be time-consuming and typically requires professional services or dedicated AppSec engineers
- ✗Scan times on large monorepos can be lengthy compared to lighter-weight SAST tools, which can create friction in fast-moving CI pipelines if not tuned carefully
- ✗Despite improved correlation, SAST engines still produce false positives that require triage, and the AI assistant's fix suggestions need human review before being merged
- ✗User interface and reporting, while comprehensive, can feel dense and overwhelming for first-time users and small teams who don't need the full enterprise feature set
Not sure which to pick?
🎯 Take our quiz →🦞
🔔
Price Drop Alerts
Get notified when AI tools lower their prices
Get weekly AI agent tool insights
Comparisons, new tool launches, and expert recommendations delivered to your inbox.
Ready to Choose?
Read the full reviews to make an informed decision