Rivet vs Agent 365
Detailed side-by-side comparison to help you choose the right tool
Rivet
🟡Low CodeAI Development Platforms
Rivet: Visual IDE for building, testing, and debugging AI agent workflows using a node-graph interface by Ironclad.
Was this helpful?
Starting Price
FreeAgent 365
AI Development Platforms
Microsoft Agent 365 is a control plane for managing, securing, and governing AI agents across an organization.
Was this helpful?
Starting Price
CustomFeature Comparison
Scroll horizontally to compare details.
Rivet - Pros & Cons
Pros
- ✓Completely free and open-source under MIT license with no seat-based pricing
- ✓YAML-based graph files enable standard Git version control and code review workflows
- ✓Production-validated by Ironclad, Attentive, and Bento — not just a prototyping tool
- ✓Real-time remote debugger shows live execution inside your deployed application
- ✓Desktop-first architecture keeps prompts and API keys on your local machine, not a vendor cloud
- ✓Public integrations with ecosystem partners like AssemblyAI for audio transcription
Cons
- ✗Desktop app requirement excludes browser-only or Chromebook development environments
- ✗Smaller community and plugin library than code-first frameworks like LangChain
- ✗Visual graphs can become unwieldy when agent workflows grow past dozens of nodes
- ✗Production integration requires engineering effort with the TypeScript SDK
- ✗No built-in hosted deployment — teams must run the executor in their own infrastructure
Agent 365 - Pros & Cons
Pros
- ✓Provides a single registry that catalogs every AI agent running across Copilot Studio, Azure AI Foundry, and third-party platforms in a Microsoft 365 tenant
- ✓Extends existing Microsoft Entra identity, Conditional Access, and Zero Trust policies to AI agents without requiring a separate identity stack
- ✓Native integration with Microsoft Purview means data loss prevention, sensitivity labels, and audit logs already cover agent activity from day one
- ✓Microsoft Defender coverage applies threat detection and response to agent behavior, addressing prompt injection and data exfiltration risks
- ✓Designed for the 400M+ Microsoft 365 commercial seats, so most enterprises can deploy without a net-new vendor procurement cycle
- ✓Backed by Microsoft's enterprise SLA, FedRAMP, and global compliance certifications already in place for the rest of the M365 stack
Cons
- ✗Enterprise-only licensing with no public pricing or self-serve tier — small teams and individual developers cannot evaluate it
- ✗Heavily optimized for Microsoft-built agents; governance depth for non-Microsoft agent frameworks (LangChain, CrewAI, custom Python agents) is more limited at launch
- ✗Requires existing investment in Microsoft Entra, Purview, and Defender to unlock the full governance value — standalone deployment offers diminished benefits
- ✗Newly announced in late 2025, so production references, third-party reviews, and long-term reliability data are still limited
- ✗Adds another administrative surface for IT teams to learn and operate alongside the existing M365 admin centers
Not sure which to pick?
🎯 Take our quiz →🔒 Security & Compliance Comparison
Scroll horizontally to compare details.
🦞
🔔
Price Drop Alerts
Get notified when AI tools lower their prices
Get weekly AI agent tool insights
Comparisons, new tool launches, and expert recommendations delivered to your inbox.