Qodo vs Augment Code

Detailed side-by-side comparison to help you choose the right tool

Qodo

🔴Developer

Developer Tools

AI quality-first developer platform (formerly Codium AI) with Qodo Gen for IDE coding, Qodo Merge for PR review, and Qodo Cover for test generation.

Was this helpful?

Starting Price

Custom

🔴Developer

Developer Tools

Augment Code is an AI coding assistant and agentic development platform built for large-codebase context, engineering workflows, and teams.

Was this helpful?

Starting Price

Custom

Scroll horizontally to compare details.

Feature	Qodo	Augment Code
Category	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Pricing Plans	99 tiers	4 tiers
Starting Price
Key Features	• AI-assisted pull request review • Potential fit for repository-based review workflows, with exact integrations requiring verification • Security analysis is listed in metadata, and public security claims include SOC 2 Type II certification, two-way encryption, secrets obfuscation, and TLS/SSL secure payment	• Context Engine for large-codebase understanding across organizational repositories • Cosmos platform coordinating agents across triage, authoring, review, and verification • MCP and native tools listed in pricing, plus SOC 2 Type II and no-AI-training language

✓Covers multiple parts of the software development lifecycle through named products for IDE coding, pull request review, and test generation.
✓Positioned around code quality rather than only code completion, which makes it relevant for teams focused on review, bug detection, and testing workflows.
✓Includes a dedicated pull request review product, Qodo Merge, for teams that want AI assistance during code review rather than only inside the IDE.
✓Includes a dedicated test generation product, Qodo Cover, which directly targets the common problem of missing or insufficient automated tests.
✓The metadata explicitly connects Qodo with CI/CD integration and pull request automation, making it a plausible fit for team-based engineering workflows.
✓Formerly Codium AI, which helps clarify product continuity for users or teams that may know the older brand name.

✗Teams must verify current billing terms before purchase because public pricing can change and enterprise pricing is contact-sales only.
✗Supported languages, frameworks, IDEs, version control systems, and CI/CD providers should be confirmed in current Qodo documentation before rollout.
✗Security analysis is listed as a tag, but teams should verify whether Qodo's coverage is sufficient before replacing dedicated security tools.
✗Test generation capabilities are described at a product level, but teams should confirm whether Qodo supports the specific test frameworks they use.
✗Teams seeking only a lightweight autocomplete tool may find the broader quality-focused platform more than they need.

✓Pricing is specific: Indie $20/month, Standard $60/developer/month, Max $200/developer/month, Enterprise custom
✓Vendor claims operational metrics such as 4x ship-cycle improvement, 70%+ pages resolved early, and 30% fewer engineering hours
✓Designed for organizations and large codebases, not only solo autocomplete use

✗Credit allowances require operational tracking, especially for teams running agents heavily
✗The strongest organizational features are likely most valuable on higher tiers or Enterprise
✗Teams with small repos may not need its large-context and cross-agent coordination layer

Not sure which to pick?

🦞

Read practical guides for choosing and using AI tools

🔔

Get notified when AI tools lower their prices

Comparisons, new tool launches, and expert recommendations delivered to your inbox.

Read the full reviews to make an informed decision