Portkey vs Vellum

Detailed side-by-side comparison to help you choose the right tool

Portkey

🔴Developer

LLM Gateway & Observability

Production AI control plane: AI gateway, prompt management, observability, guardrails, and MCP gateway in front of 1,600+ LLM providers.

Was this helpful?

Starting Price

Free

Vellum

🔴Developer

LLM Development Platforms

Development platform for production LLM apps: prompt engineering, evaluation, retrieval, and workflow orchestration in one workspace.

Was this helpful?

Starting Price

Custom

Feature Comparison

Scroll horizontally to compare details.

FeaturePortkeyVellum
CategoryLLM Gateway & ObservabilityLLM Development Platforms
Pricing Plans8 tiers8 tiers
Starting PriceFree
Key Features
  • OpenAI-compatible AI gateway
  • Multi-provider routing across 1,600+ models
  • Automatic fallbacks, load balancing, retries, and request timeouts
  • Visual workflow editor for multi-step LLM pipelines with branching, tool use, and RAG
  • Collaborative prompt engineering with version control and diff tracking
  • Automated evaluation pipelines with custom scoring, LLM-as-judge, and regression testing

Portkey - Pros & Cons

Pros

  • OpenAI-compatible API gives teams one integration point while still routing to 1,600+ models across providers such as OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Mistral, AWS Bedrock, Azure OpenAI, Cohere, Together, Fireworks, and Groq.
  • Fallback and load-balancing are built into the gateway layer, so reliability policies can be configured centrally instead of duplicated across each application service.
  • Combines 5 production AI functions in one platform: AI gateway, prompt management, observability, guardrails, and MCP Gateway.
  • Prompt versioning and A/B testing help teams change production prompts with more control than hard-coded prompt strings in application code.
  • Observability includes per-request tracing and cost analytics, which is especially useful when several teams or products share model providers.
  • Enterprise options mentioned in the available content include VPC deployment, SSO, audit logs, and SOC 2 / HIPAA support.

Cons

  • Adds a hosted gateway hop between the application and the LLM provider, so teams must evaluate added latency and dependency risk.
  • The main paid self-serve plan is $49/month for 100k recorded logs, with overage fees beyond that included quota.
  • May be more platform than needed for teams that only want basic LLM request logging or tracing.
  • Advanced enterprise controls such as VPC deployment, SSO, audit logs, and compliance support appear oriented toward Enterprise contracts rather than small self-serve users.
  • Teams must learn Portkey-specific routing, guardrail, prompt, and gateway configuration concepts before they get full value.

Vellum - Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Prompts + evals + workflows + observability in one product reduces tool sprawl
  • Versioning/rollback story is stronger than most LLM platforms
  • LLM-as-judge + custom Python scorers cover most eval needs
  • Built-in RAG removes the need for a separate vector DB integration
  • Engineering-friendly UX — feels like a real IDE, not a chat playground

Cons

  • $500/mo entry tier is steep for solo developers
  • Visual workflows hit limits when logic gets very complex
  • Eval suite is solid but Braintrust goes deeper on eval-specific UX
  • Vendor-managed RAG limits some advanced retrieval setups
  • Pricing was reported recently — verify with sales before purchase

Not sure which to pick?

🎯 Take our quiz →
🦞

New to AI tools?

Read practical guides for choosing and using AI tools

🔔

Price Drop Alerts

Get notified when AI tools lower their prices

Tracking 2 tools

We only email when prices actually change. No spam, ever.

Get weekly AI agent tool insights

Comparisons, new tool launches, and expert recommendations delivered to your inbox.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Ready to Choose?

Read the full reviews to make an informed decision