PlugThis vs Devv
Detailed side-by-side comparison to help you choose the right tool
PlugThis
🟢No CodeAI App Builders
AI Chrome extension builder: describe what you want in chat and PlugThis generates a complete, installable Manifest V3 Chrome extension in about two minutes, with real Supabase backends and OpenAI/Anthropic/Gemini models built in.
Was this helpful?
Starting Price
CustomDevv
🟡Low CodeAI App Builders
Devv is an AI coding agent purpose-built for indie hackers and small teams shipping full-stack AI-powered products, combining code generation with opinionated stacks (Next.js, Supabase, Stripe, AI SDKs) so the agent produces working applications rather than disconnected snippets.
Was this helpful?
Starting Price
CustomFeature Comparison
Scroll horizontally to compare details.
PlugThis - Pros & Cons
Pros
- ✓Purpose-built for Chrome extensions — Manifest V3, popup, background, and content scripts wired up automatically, no boilerplate.
- ✓Real Supabase backend integration (Postgres, auth, edge functions) means you can ship accounts and stored data, not just popup UI.
- ✓You own 100% of the source code — cancel the subscription and the extension is still yours to keep, modify, and re-publish.
- ✓Cheap entry: Starter at $9.99/month is real (not a marketing decoy), and cancel-anytime removes the usual SaaS commitment.
- ✓Priority support on Builder includes a video call when you get stuck on debugging or Chrome Web Store listing — actually useful for non-coders.
Cons
- ✗Chrome only — no Firefox, Edge (beyond Chromium compatibility), or Safari packaging.
- ✗AI models are 'bring your own key,' so API cost from OpenAI/Anthropic/Gemini is on top of the subscription.
- ✗No MCP support, so you can't drive PlugThis from an MCP host or expose the builder itself as a tool.
- ✗Extension caps by plan (1 on Starter, 3 on Builder) mean agencies with many small client extensions will burn through plans fast.
Devv - Pros & Cons
Pros
- ✓Opinionated AI-native primitives reduce setup work for chat, embeddings, and agent-style product flows.
- ✓Generated output is positioned as a real GitHub repo the user owns, which is important for teams that want to continue development outside the builder.
- ✓The listed stack includes 4 practical SaaS building blocks: Next.js, Supabase, Stripe, and AI SDKs.
- ✓Pre-wired Supabase and Stripe support shortens the path from prototype to a subscription-ready product.
- ✓The product targets indie hackers and small teams specifically, rather than trying to cover every enterprise development workflow.
- ✓A free starting point is useful for validating ideas before committing to a paid AI app builder.
Cons
- ✗The opinionated stack is a limitation if your preferred architecture uses tools such as Clerk, Firebase, Railway, or a custom backend instead of Supabase.
- ✗Paid pricing is published at $20/month for Pro and $200/month for Max, but exact included quotas, overages, and team features still need direct verification.
- ✗Teams should expect to review generated code carefully before production use, especially for authentication, billing, and AI workflow edge cases.
- ✗The tool appears more focused on AI-native SaaS apps than on broad application categories such as mobile apps, internal enterprise systems, or complex legacy migrations.
- ✗Compared with more established AI app builders, Devv may require more due diligence around documentation depth, support channels, and long-term product maturity.
Not sure which to pick?
🎯 Take our quiz →Price Drop Alerts
Get notified when AI tools lower their prices
Get weekly AI agent tool insights
Comparisons, new tool launches, and expert recommendations delivered to your inbox.