Piktochart vs Figma
Detailed side-by-side comparison to help you choose the right tool
Piktochart
🟢No CodeDesign & Creative
Create professional infographics, presentations, reports, posters, charts, and other visual content with templates, data visualization tools, collaboration features, and AI-assisted design workflows.
Was this helpful?
Starting Price
$0/monthFigma
🟡Low CodeDesign & Creative
Figma: Professional design and prototyping platform that enables teams to create, collaborate, and iterate on user interfaces and digital products in real-time.
Was this helpful?
Starting Price
FreeFeature Comparison
Scroll horizontally to compare details.
Piktochart - Pros & Cons
Pros
- ✓Free plan includes unlimited visual projects, 2 PNG downloads, and monthly AI credits
- ✓Pro costs $10 per member/month when billed annually and unlocks premium templates and unlimited PNG downloads
- ✓Business adds practical team controls at $17 per member/month when billed annually
- ✓Data visualization features are stronger than a general-purpose design canvas for infographic-heavy work
- ✓The platform covers both static visuals and lightweight video workflows
- ✓Piktochart publishes dedicated solution and template paths for education, marketing, nonprofit, HR, communications, and report-style use cases
Cons
- ✗The Free plan only allows 2 visual downloads and PNG export
- ✗Pro still downloads visuals only as PNG; teams that need PDF or PowerPoint export need Business or higher
- ✗Advanced brand controls such as unlimited brand color schemes and branded templates require Business or higher
- ✗AI credits are finite: Free includes 60, Pro includes 500, and Business includes 1,000 credits per month
- ✗Enterprise security features such as SSO/SAML, SLA support, and security reviews are reserved for custom plans
Figma - Pros & Cons
Pros
- ✓Real-time multiplayer collaboration with live cursors, comments, and audio chat lets distributed teams design together as if they were in the same room, eliminating file-versioning friction
- ✓Browser-first architecture with native desktop apps means no installs are required for stakeholders to view or comment, and files are always up to date across macOS, Windows, Linux, and ChromeOS
- ✓Mature design system tooling — components, variants, auto layout, variables, and shared libraries — supports enterprise-scale design systems that stay in sync across products
- ✓Dev Mode produces accurate measurements, design tokens, and CSS/iOS/Android code snippets, dramatically reducing handoff churn between designers and engineers
- ✓Massive plugin and Community ecosystem provides thousands of free templates, UI kits, icon libraries, and automation plugins that extend core functionality
- ✓Integrated AI tooling (Figma AI, Figma Make) generates designs, prototypes, and even functional code from prompts directly inside the canvas, without switching tools
Cons
- ✗Heavy files with many components, variants, or large prototypes can slow performance noticeably in the browser, and very large design systems sometimes hit memory limits
- ✗Offline support is limited — most features require an active connection, which is a real constraint for designers traveling or working in low-connectivity environments
- ✗Per-editor seat pricing at the Organization and Enterprise tiers becomes expensive quickly for larger teams, especially when factoring in separate Dev Mode and FigJam seats
- ✗Vector illustration and advanced drawing tools are less powerful than dedicated apps like Adobe Illustrator, making Figma a poor fit for complex marketing illustration or print work
- ✗AI features are still maturing and inconsistent — generated designs often need significant manual refinement, and outputs can feel generic without careful prompting
Not sure which to pick?
🎯 Take our quiz →🦞
🔔
Price Drop Alerts
Get notified when AI tools lower their prices
Get weekly AI agent tool insights
Comparisons, new tool launches, and expert recommendations delivered to your inbox.