Palo Alto Networks Prisma AIRS vs Adept

Detailed side-by-side comparison to help you choose the right tool

Palo Alto Networks Prisma AIRS

Business AI Solutions

Prisma AIRS is an AI runtime security platform from Palo Alto Networks designed to protect AI applications, agents, models, and data across the AI application lifecycle.

Was this helpful?

Starting Price

Custom

Adept

πŸ”΄Developer

Business AI Solutions

Adept AI licenses its ACT-1 Action Transformer technology to enterprise partners, enabling them to build AI agents that visually control any computer software using natural language commands. Through its partnership model, Adept provides screen-reading AI models, proprietary training datasets, and technical consultation for building custom agentic automation solutionsβ€”offering an alternative to traditional RPA platforms for organizations with complex, multi-application workflows.

Was this helpful?

Starting Price

Contact Sales

Feature Comparison

Scroll horizontally to compare details.

FeaturePalo Alto Networks Prisma AIRSAdept
CategoryBusiness AI SolutionsBusiness AI Solutions
Pricing Plans10 tiers6 tiers
Starting PriceContact Sales
Key Features
    • β€’ Visual screen understanding and automation
    • β€’ Natural language workflow execution
    • β€’ Cross-application automation capabilities

    Palo Alto Networks Prisma AIRS - Pros & Cons

    Pros

    • βœ“Comprehensive coverage spanning models, applications, data, and AI agents in a single platform rather than point solutions
    • βœ“Backed by Palo Alto Networks' established threat intelligence and integrates with existing Prisma, Cortex, and NGFW deployments
    • βœ“Includes proactive controls (model scanning, posture management, red teaming) alongside runtime protection for defense in depth
    • βœ“Real-time inspection of prompts and responses helps mitigate prompt injection, data leakage, and policy violations as they occur
    • βœ“Dedicated AI agent security addresses emerging risks around tool use, identity, and autonomous decision-making in agentic systems
    • βœ“Enterprise-grade governance, reporting, and compliance support suited to regulated industries and large security operations teams

    Cons

    • βœ—Enterprise-only pricing model with no public pricing or self-serve tier makes evaluation difficult for smaller teams
    • βœ—Greatest value is realized when paired with the wider Palo Alto Networks ecosystem, which can create vendor lock-in
    • βœ—Configuration, tuning, and integration across complex AI estates typically requires significant security engineering effort
    • βœ—Overlapping capabilities with existing CSPM, DLP, and WAF tools may require careful policy design to avoid duplication
    • βœ—Rapidly evolving AI threat landscape means coverage of newer attack techniques and frameworks may lag in some areas

    Adept - Pros & Cons

    Pros

    • βœ“Works with any desktop or web application without requiring API integrations - ideal for legacy systems and custom enterprise software
    • βœ“Natural language interface makes automation accessible to non-technical business users without requiring Python, JavaScript, or RPA scripting knowledge
    • βœ“Advanced reinforcement learning adaptation handles interface changes and unexpected scenarios, reducing the 30-40% maintenance overhead typical of traditional RPA deployments
    • βœ“Backed by $415M in funding with founding team including Ashish Vaswani (transformer architecture co-inventor) and former Google/OpenAI research leads
    • βœ“ACT-1 model can execute multi-step workflows spanning 10+ applications in a single natural language command, eliminating manual context switching
    • βœ“Enterprise-grade partnership model provides deep customization and dedicated technical consultation unavailable from off-the-shelf RPA vendors

    Cons

    • βœ—Partnership-only access model with no self-service signup or public availabilityβ€”requires direct enterprise sales engagement and significant upfront investment
    • βœ—No transparent pricing published; licensing fees, professional services, and ongoing consultation costs are negotiated per partnership
    • βœ—Requires extensive screen access permissions that may conflict with zero-trust security policies and SOC 2/HIPAA compliance frameworks
    • βœ—Following 2024 strategic shift, key talent moved to Amazonβ€”raising questions about long-term product roadmap continuity for partners
    • βœ—Visual-only automation cannot handle command-line interfaces, headless servers, or API-only backend systems common in modern DevOps workflows

    Not sure which to pick?

    🎯 Take our quiz β†’

    πŸ”’ Security & Compliance Comparison

    Scroll horizontally to compare details.

    Security FeaturePalo Alto Networks Prisma AIRSAdept
    SOC2β€”β€”
    GDPRβ€”βœ… Yes
    HIPAAβ€”β€”
    SSOβ€”β€”
    Self-Hostedβ€”βŒ No
    On-Premβ€”βŒ No
    RBACβ€”βœ… Yes
    Audit Logβ€”βœ… Yes
    Open Sourceβ€”βŒ No
    API Key Authβ€”βœ… Yes
    Encryption at Restβ€”βœ… Yes
    Encryption in Transitβ€”βœ… Yes
    Data Residencyβ€”Configurable
    Data Retentionβ€”Configurable
    🦞

    New to AI tools?

    Read practical guides for choosing and using AI tools

    πŸ””

    Price Drop Alerts

    Get notified when AI tools lower their prices

    Tracking 2 tools

    We only email when prices actually change. No spam, ever.

    Get weekly AI agent tool insights

    Comparisons, new tool launches, and expert recommendations delivered to your inbox.

    No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

    Ready to Choose?

    Read the full reviews to make an informed decision