OpenDevin vs Codeium (Devin Desktop)

Detailed side-by-side comparison to help you choose the right tool

OpenDevin

🔴Developer

AI Development Assistants

Autonomous AI software engineer that generates code, debugs applications, and automates complex development workflows in sandboxed environments.

Was this helpful?

Starting Price

Free

🟡Low Code

AI Development Platforms

Codeium has rebranded to Devin Desktop under Cognition — an IDE plus coding-agent command center with Free, Pro $20, Max $200, and Team plans.

Was this helpful?

Starting Price

Custom

Scroll horizontally to compare details.

✓Open-source core under the MIT license, including the main openhands and agent-server Docker images, which makes the agent stack inspectable and self-hostable for technical teams.
✓Multiple product surfaces are available from the same project: Python SDK, CLI, local GUI with REST API, hosted cloud deployment, and enterprise self-hosted deployment.
✓The CLI can be powered by Claude, GPT, or other LLMs, giving teams flexibility instead of locking them into one model provider.
✓The SDK is designed for developers who want to define agents in code and run them locally or scale them to large numbers of agents in the cloud.
✓OpenHands Cloud includes team-oriented features such as Slack, Jira, Linear integrations, multi-user support, RBAC, permissions, and conversation sharing.
✓Public repository activity, release history, stars, forks, and contributor counts can be inspected directly on GitHub and should be checked there because those metrics change frequently.

✗The original OpenDevin branding has moved to OpenHands, which can create confusion when searching for documentation, releases, or current product information.
✗Enterprise functionality is source-available but not fully MIT-licensed; running the enterprise directory beyond one month requires purchasing a license.
✗The tool depends on external or configured LLMs such as Claude, GPT, or other models, so real operating cost and output quality vary by provider and model choice.
✗Autonomous coding agents still require careful human review before code is merged, especially when they modify application logic, dependencies, tests, or infrastructure.
✗Self-hosting the enterprise cloud deployment requires Kubernetes and private infrastructure experience, which may be excessive for smaller teams.

✓Bundles a real IDE, frontier model access, and Devin Cloud agents at $20/month — competitive with Cursor
✓SWE 1.6 (Cognition's own coding model) is free on Pro+ and is improving fast as a first-party model
✓Agent Client Protocol and parallel session management are genuinely useful for multi-agent workflows

✗Rebrand from Codeium / Windsurf to Devin Desktop has created naming confusion across docs and tutorials
✗Free plan is now meaningfully more limited than the original Codeium free-forever autocomplete
✗$200/mo Max plan matches Cursor Ultra without a clear quality advantage on frontier model output

Not sure which to pick?

🦞

Read practical guides for choosing and using AI tools

🔔

Get notified when AI tools lower their prices

Comparisons, new tool launches, and expert recommendations delivered to your inbox.

Read the full reviews to make an informed decision